Hello,..
I have a document indexed with Solr. Originally it had only few fields. I want
to add some more fields to the index later, based on ID but I don't want to
submit original fields again. I use Solr 1.2, but I think there is no such
functionality yet. But I saw a feature here
https://iss
ubject: Re: Document update based on ID
Evgeniy Strokin wrote:
> Hello,..
> I have a document indexed with Solr. Originally it had only few fields. I
> want to add some more fields to the index later, based on ID but I don't want
> to submit original fields again. I use Solr 1.2,
Hello,.. If index size is 100Gb and I want to run optimize command, how much
more space I need for this?
Also,.. If I run snapshooter does it take more space during shooting than
actual snapshoot?
\Thank you
Gene
Hello,...
we have 110M records index under Solr. Some queries takes a while, but we need
sub-second results. I guess the only solution is cache (something else?)...
We use standard LRUCache. In docs it says (as far as I understood) that it
loads view of index in to memory and next time works with
mber 4, 2007 2:33:24 PM
Subject: Re: Cache use
On 4-Dec-07, at 8:43 AM, Evgeniy Strokin wrote:
> Hello,...
> we have 110M records index under Solr. Some queries takes a while,
> but we need sub-second results. I guess the only solution is cache
> (something else?)...
> We u
es are sub-second.
Dennis Kubes
Evgeniy Strokin wrote:
> Hello,...
> we have 110M records index under Solr. Some queries takes a while, but we
> need sub-second results. I guess the only solution is cache (something
> else?)...
> We use standard LRUCache. In docs it says (as far
I have huge index base (about 110 millions documents, 100 fields each). But
size of the index base is reasonable, it's about 70 Gb. All I need is increase
performance, since some queries, which match big number of documents, are
running slow.
So I was thinking is any benefits to use hadoop for t
Hello, I don't know how to formulate this right, I'll give an example:
I have 20 millions documents with unique ID indexed.
I have list of IDs stored somewhere. I need to run query which will take
documents with ID from my list and gives me some statistic.
For example: my documents are addresses
Hello. If I need documents which has number of fields but also I have number of
other documents which related to the first one one-to-many. For example a
person, could have several addresses. I want to have all of them in search
result if I look for people. Also I want to search people by addres
Hello, is this possible to do in one query:
I have a query which returns 1000 documents with names and addresses. I can run
facet on state field and see how many addresses I have in each state. But also
I need to see how many families lives in each state. So as a result I need a
matrix of states
If I make one of my field as a unique ID, id doesn't increase/decrease
performance of searching by this field. Right?
For example if I have two fields, I know for sure both of them are unique, both
the same type, and make one of them as a Solr Unique ID. The general
performance should be the sam
Hello,..
I have relatively large RAM (10Gb) on my server which is running Solr. I
increased Cache settings and start to see OutOfMemory exceptions, specially on
facet search.
Is anybody has some suggestions how Cache settings related to Memory
consumptions? What are optimal settings? How they c
server initialization:
-Xmx1536m -Xms1536m
Which app server / servlet container are you using?
Regards,
Daniel Alheiros
On 16/1/08 15:23, "Evgeniy Strokin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,..
> I have relatively large RAM (10Gb) on my server which is running Solr. I
> increas
ne in RDBMS with some count(*) and
GROUP BY selects.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message ----
From: Evgeniy Strokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Solr User
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 4:39:44 PM
Subject: Big number of conditions of the
to manually increase the max
number of clauses allowed (in one of the configs) and make sure the JVM has
plenty of memory. But again, this is best done in RDBMS with some count(*) and
GROUP BY selects.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Messa
and make sure the JVM has
plenty of memory. But again, this is best done in RDBMS with some count(*) and
GROUP BY selects.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Evgeniy Strokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Solr User
Sent: Thursda
Hello,.. Lets say I have one query like this:
NAME:Smith
I need to restrict the result and I'm doing this:
NAME:Smith AND AGE:30
Also, I can do this using fq parameter:
q=NAME:Smith&fq=AGE:30
The result of second and third queries should be the same, right?
But why should I use fq then? In which ca
Chris, I'm very interested to implement generic multidimensional faceting. But
I'm not an expert in Solr, but I'm very good with Java. So I need little bit
more directions if you don't mind. I promise to share my code and if you'll be
Ok with it you are welcome to use it.
So, Lets say I have a p
Hello,
I'm overwriting getFacetInfo(...) method from standard request handler (BTW:
thanks for making a separate method for faceting :-))
What I need is to ran original query several times with filter query which I
generate based on result from original query. Bellow is part of my code.
I was thi
Yes I do computing the same DocSet. Should it be the problem? Is any way to
solve it?
In general in each thread I ran the same query and add different Filter Query.
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Solr User
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:19:02 AM
S
I know there was such discussions about the subject, but I want to ask again if
somebody could share more information.
We are planning to have several separate servers for our search engine. One of
them will be index/search server, and all others are search only.
We want to use SAN (BTW: should w
I'm running my tests on server with 4 double-kernel CPU. I was expecting good
improvements from multithreaded solution but I have speed 10th times worse.
Here is how I run those threads, I think I'm doing something wrong, please
advise:
--
.
I want to get sample from my search result. Not first 10 but 10 random (really
random, not pseudo random) documents.
For example if I run simple query like STATE:NJ no order by any field, just the
query and get 10 first documents from my result set, will it be random 10 or
pseudo random, like fi
fields affect index size?
Make sure you omit norms for those fields if possible. If you do
that, the index should only be marginally bigger.
-Yonik
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Evgeniy Strokin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, lets say I have 10 fields and usually some 5 of them
should only be marginally bigger.
-Yonik
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Evgeniy Strokin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, lets say I have 10 fields and usually some 5 of them are present in
> each document. And the size of my index is 100Mb.
> I want to change my schema and
We store all needed fields in Solr, but we have only 20 stored fields out of
100+ indexed. Our requirements is to show 20 fields after searching, and when
clients are happy with the result (usually after several searches), we append
all others from DB. Of course it takes a while, because our DB
I have two questions related to the subject:
1. If I have 100 fields in my document, all indexed. Will my queries run slower
if I store all 100 fields or just 10?
2. If I have 100 fields in my documents, all stored. Will my queries run slower
if I index all 100 fields or just 10?
Thanks in
Hello,.. I have odd problem.
I use Solr for regular search, and it works fine for my task, but my client has
a list of IDs in a flat separate file (he could have huge amount of the IDs, up
to 1M) and he wants to exclude those IDs from result of the search.
What is the right way to do this?
Any t
bject: Re: how to suppress result
Hi Evgeniy
+) delete the documents if you really don't need need them
+) create a field "ignored" and build an appropriate query to exclude
the documents where 'ignored' is true
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Evgeniy Strokin wrote:
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
