Solr 5.3.1
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Dec 31, 2015, at 4:50 PM, William Bell wrote:
>
> We are getting weird results with if(exists(a),b,c). We are getting b+c!!
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?q=*:*&wt=json&state=state:%22CO%22&state1=state:%22NY%22&fq=if(exists(que
Run it on 2 separate boxes
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Aswath Srinivasan (TMS)
> wrote:
>
> Hi fellow developers,
>
> I have a situation where the search front-end application is using java 1.6.
> Upgrading Java version is out of the question.
>
> Planning to u
Put the match into 2 separate fields and index it. Then sort in Solr by the 2
fields is one way
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:15 AM, John Bickerstaff
> wrote:
>
> Just to be clear - I don't mean who requests the list (application or user)
> I mean what "rule" determines
Why do you think it would ?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Bhaumik Joshi wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We are doing query performance test with different soft commit intervals. In
> the test with 1sec of soft commit interval and 1min of soft commit interval
> we didn't n
You do need to optimize to get rid of the deleted docs probably...
That is a lot of deleted docs
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG
> wrote:
>
> Dear Solr experts :),
>
> I read this very interesting post 'Understanding and tuning your Solr ca
Use fq
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Sep 23, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Andreas Hubold
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we're using Solr 4.10.4 and the dismax query parser to search across multiple
> fields. One of the fields is configured with a StandardTokenizer (type
> "text_general"). I set mm=100% to o
Can we add it back with a parameter at least ?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Uwe Reh wrote:
>> our bibliographic index (~20M entries) runs fine with Solr 4.10.3
>> With Solr 5.3 faceted searching is constant
Scary stuff
If you did that you better reload the core
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu
> wrote:
>
> Thank you so much.
>
> Safe to ignore the following(not a query):-
>
> *Never did this. *But how about this crazy idea:
>
> Take an Amazo
fl=$b tells me it works. Or I can do a sort=$b asc
The idea is to calculate a score but only include geo if it is not a national
search. Do we want to send in a parameter into the QT which allows us to omit
geo from national searches
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:15 A
Interested for sure
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 4:05 PM, John Bickerstaff
> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth - I found enough frustration upgrading that I decided
> to "upgrade by replacement"
>
> Now, I suppose if you've got a huge dataset to re-index that could be a
> pr
You can pahinaye and sort as long as it is the same each time. Sort can be a
function value too. I.e. Sort=geodist() asc...
bq can also boost based on a field name
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Lucas Cotta wrote:
>
> Hi Walter, unfortunately I use pagination so
What tool is that ? The stats I would like to run on my Solr instance
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 12/2/2016 12:01 PM, S G wrote:
>> This post shows some stats on Solr which indicate that there might be a
>> memory leak in there.
>>
>>
Yes with Nginx in front of it
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Max Bridgewater
> wrote:
>
> I have one Solr core on my solr 6 instance and I can query it with:
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/mycore/search?q=*:*
>
> Is there a way to configure solr 6 so that I can s
Can you set Solr config segments to a higher number, don't optimize and you
will get smaller files after a new index is created.
Can you reindex ?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 7:15 AM, Narsimha Reddy CHALLA
> wrote:
>
> No, it does not work by splitting. First of all luce
Try disabling and perf may get better
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 6:41 AM, Yago Riveiro wrote:
>
> The documentation says that the only caches configurable are:
>
> - filterCache
> - queryResultCache
> - documentCache
> - user defined caches
>
> There is no entry for fie
I am available for consulting projects if your project needs help.
Been doing Solr work for 6 years...
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
Yeah we normally take the number of GB on a machine for the index size on disk
and then double it for memory...
For example we have 28gb on disk and we see great perf at 64gb ram.
If you can do that you will probably get good results. Remember to not give
Java much memory. We set it at 12gb. We
Set mincount to 1
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 7:19 AM, Sebastian Riemer wrote:
>
> Pardon me,
> the second search should have been this:
> http://localhost:8983/solr/wemi/select?fq=m_mediaType_s:%221%22&indent=on&q=*:*&rows=0&start=0&wt=json
>
> (or in other words, giv
Great question
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Jan 18, 2017, at 1:32 AM, nabil Kouici wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I'm using join across collection feature to do an inner join between 2
> collections. It works fine.
> Is it possible to use this feature to compare between fields from different
> co
Are you using docvalues ? Try that it might help.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Bhawna Asnani wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am experiencing a similar issue. We have tried method uif but that didn't
> help much. There is still some performance degradation.
> Perhaps some under
I would love for the SOLR spatial 4 to support pt so that I can run # of
results around a central point easily like in 3.6. How can I pass parameters
to a Circle() ? I would love to send PT to this query since the pt is the
same across multiple areas
For example:
http://localhost:8983/solr/core/s
Since Spatial Lucene 4 does not seem to support geodist(), even sending
d,pt,fq={!geofilt}does not help me = I need to sort. So I end up having to
set up the sortsq. Any other ideas on how to support the old syntax on the
new spatial? Can I create a transform or something ?
Convert
http://localho
Ssd does not always improve performance of Solr. We tried several SSD and we
saw an improvement of only a few percentages in query qtime, etc...
It is definitely not always a slam dunk
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/recommended-SSD-tp4002975p4004898.htm
Ssd does not always improve performance of Solr. We tried several SSD and we
saw an improvement of only a few percentages in query qtime, etc...
It is definitely not always a slam dunk
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/recommended-SSD-tp4002975p4004899.htm
24 matches
Mail list logo
