> Everything should work as before. So faceting, function
> queries, query
> boosting should still work.
>
> For eg:
> q=name:efghij^2.2 name:abcd^3.2
>
> returns all docs with name efghij and abcd but ranking
> documents named
> abcd above efghij
>
Thanks Nagendra.
But I wasn't talking abo
the index get bigger? You're still indexing the same title, just to
different dynamic fields, right? So the total amount of data indexed should
still be the same. Adding dynamic fields shouldn't increase the index size.
What am I missing?
Andy
Is there any example schema for Chinese that I could use as a guide right now?
Thanks
--- On Sat, 5/21/11, Michael McCandless wrote:
> From: Michael McCandless
> Subject: Re: chinese SOLR query parser
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 6:14 PM
> Unfortunately, S
nificantly reduced?
2) The paper stated that the performance of NRT updates could be drastically
improved if IndexWriter.getReader() performance is improved. Is there any
tuning on Solr that can be done to improve IndexWriter.getReader() performance?
Andy
--- On Thu, 5/19/11, Nagendra Nagaraja
Hi,
When specifying an analyzer for a fieldType, I can say type="index" or
type="query"
What if I don't spcify the type for an analyzer? Does it default to "index" or
"query" or both?
Thanks.
Solr. Always got the error message of opening too many Searchers. Has
anyone got this to work?
Any other options?
Thanks
Andy
hmark comparing the performance of facet search with and
without NRT?
Thanks
Andy
--- On Wed, 6/1/11, Nagendra Nagarajayya wrote:
> From: Nagendra Nagarajayya
> Subject: Re: NRT facet search options comparison
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 1
Hi,
According to the doc:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageAnalysis#Chinese.2C_Japanese.2C_Korean
solr.SmartChineseWordTokenFilterFactory is for Simplified Chinese.
Does it work for Traditional Chinese too? If not, is there anything equivalent
for Traditional Chinese?
Thanks.
Nagendra,
In another email you mentioned there's a problem where if an existing document
is updated both the old and new version will show up in search results.
Has that been solved in Solr-RA 3.3?
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Nagendra Nagarajayya wrote:
> From: Nagendra Nagarajayya
> Subject: [Anno
So If I want to use multi-value facet with NRT I'd need to convert the cache to
per-segment? How do I do that?
Thanks.
From: Jason Rutherglen
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Nrt and caching
The field caches
hanks
From: Jason Rutherglen
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Nrt and caching
Andy,
You'd need to hack on the Solr code, specifically the SimpleFacets class.
Solr uses UnInvertedField to build an in memory do
Hi,
I understand that the cache for multi-value facet is multi-segment. So every
time a document is updated the entire cache needs to be rebuilt.
Is there any rule of thumb on the highest update rate NRT can handle before
this cache-rebuild-on-each-commit becomes too expensive? I know it depend
Whenever I reply to an email to this list I got a failure notice (please see
below)
What can I do?
Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
:
Remote host said: 552 spam score (6.0) exceeded threshold
(FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,FSL_FREEMAIL_1,FSL_FREEMAIL_2,HTM
Nagendra,
Does RankingAlgorithm work with faceting which requires the use of cache? As
new documents are added or updated, the cache will be constantly invalidated.
So how would RankingAlgorithm work in this case?
From: Nagendra Nagarajayya
To: solr-user@luce
://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
On 7/24/2012 2:57 PM, Andy wrote:
> Nagendra,
>
> Does RankingAlgorithm work with faceting which requires the use of cache? As
> new documents are added or updated, the cache will be constantly invalidated.
> So how would RankingAlgorithm wo
;start=0&rows=10&indent=on
the search result will be in many categories ,for example may be in
206,782,307,289
you know the the default sort which depends on the relevance, *I want the
result which in category 206 is in front of others*
does anybody know about it
Thanks
Andy
--
View
Hi iorixxx,
Thanks for your reply, if I insert the clause category:206^100 , the search
result will only include the results in category 206
?
iorixxx wrote
>
>> category field has certain values ,for
>> examples:307,503,206..
>>
>> my query like
>> this:q=cell+phone&version=2.2&start=0&rows=
Thanks
Yes, my default operator is AND,if I use OR operator like this:
q=cell phone OR category:206^100 , the results will more than the query
q=cell phone may be something in the category 206 which don't contains the
cell phone keywords will be included, This is really a tickler for me
iori
I got it , thanks for ur kindly reply!!!
iorixxx wrote
>
>> Thanks for your reply, if I insert the clause
>> category:206^100 , the search
>> result will only include the results in category 206
>> ?
>
> It will be an optional clause, unless you have set default operator to AND
> somewhere.
>
I know fail over is available in solr4.0 right now, if one server
crashes,other servers also support query,I set up a solr cloud like this
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4007117/Selection_028.png
I use http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*%3A*&wt=xml for query
at first, if t
I use the Solr 4.0-BETA version, my request url is
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*%3A*&rows=0&wt=xml&facet.pivot=cat,popularity,inStock&facet.pivot=popularity,cat&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.pivot.mincount=0
but I do not get any facet pivot info in the result
true
*:*
cat
Cool,Thanks Mark!
Mark Miller-3 wrote
>
> Either setup a load balancer, or use the SolrCloud solrj client
> CloudSolrServer - it takes a comma separated list of zk servers rather
> than a solr url.
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:17 PM, andy <yhlweb@> wrote:
>> I
nobody use this function yet?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-BETA-facet-pivot-returns-no-result-tp4007133p4007476.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the version info as follows
4.0.0.2012.08.06.22.50.47
4.0.0-BETA 1370099 - rmuir - 2012-08-06
22:50:47
4.0.0-BETA
4.0.0-BETA 1370099 - rmuir - 2012-08-06
22:44:25
Chris Hostetter-3 wrote
>
> are you absolutely certain you are using the 4.0-BETA?
>
> I just tried that exact URL using hte samp
I got the answer,apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA.tgz is OK, I used the
apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA.zip before
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-BETA-facet-pivot-returns-no-result-tp4007133p4007680.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have documents that represent Companies. Each company has a field "Internet"
which is a boolean field, True means the company is an Internet company.
There's also another field "location" which is the city the company is located
in, eg. "Austin" or "Houston".
A company can be both an Internet
Is there any way to modify result ranking using an integer field?
I have documents that have an integer field "popularity".
I want to rank results by a combination of normal fulltext search
relevance and popularity. It's kinda like search in digg - result
ranking is based on the search releva
Thanks Ahmet.
Do I need to do anything to enable BoostQParserPlugin in Solr, or is it already
enabled?
--- On Sun, 1/3/10, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
From: Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: Any way to modify result ranking using an integer field?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010
What I meant was that is there any way to make {!boost b=log(popularity)} the
default query type so that every query will be using it.
From: Andy
Subject: Re: Any way to modify result ranking using an integer field?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 1:08 AM
Thanks
Thank you Ahmet.
Is there any way I can configure Solr to always use {!boost b=log(popularity)}
as the default for all queries?
I'm using Solr through django-haystack, so all the Solr queries are actually
generated by haystack. It'd be much cleaner if I could configure Solr to always
use Boost
I'd like to boost every query using {!boost b=log(popularity)}. But I'd rather
not have to prepend that to every query. It'd be much cleaner for me to
configure Solr to use that as default.
My plan is to make DisMaxRequestHandler the default handler and add the
following to solrconfig.xml:
On Wed, 1/6/10, Yonik Seeley wrote:
From: Yonik Seeley
Subject: Re: DisMaxRequestHandler bf configuration
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 7:09 PM
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Andy wrote:
> I'd like to boost every query using {!boost b=log(populari
uery by default.
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Yonik Seeley wrote:
From: Yonik Seeley
Subject: Re: DisMaxRequestHandler bf configuration
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 7:48 PM
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Andy wrote:
> So if I want to configure Solr to turn every
10, Yonik Seeley wrote:
From: Yonik Seeley
Subject: Re: DisMaxRequestHandler bf configuration
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 8:42 PM
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Andy wrote:
> I meant can I do it with dismax without modifying every single query? I'm
he default params/values for a request handler in the
solrconfig.xml .
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
- Original Message ----
> From: Andy
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 4:56:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Any way to
here, but i'd use q personally.
On Jan 6, 2010, at 9:45 PM, Andy wrote:
> Let me make sure I understand you.
>
> I'd get my regular query from haystack as qq=foo rather than q=foo.
>
> Then I put in solrconfig within the dismax section:
>
>
> {!boo
e.org
Date: Thursday, January 7, 2010, 9:57 PM
On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Andy wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Can I use the standard request handler for this purpose? So something like:
Yes, but...
>
>
>
> {!boost b=$popularityboost
>v=$qq}&popularityboost=log(popula
Is it possible to set up Solr such that when there's no query (client would
send in "*:*" for "q"), Solr would sort results (basically all the documents)
by date or some other criterion.
And when there is a query other than "*:*", I'd want the results to be ranked
by score.
Is that something t
xt.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Andy
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Fri, January 15, 2010 3:47:26 PM
> > Subject: only use sorting when there's no "q" is
> "*:*"?
&
Solr comes with Jetty. But I noticed that Lucid Solr switched to Tomcat. What
is the reason for that?
Is there a recommended servlet container for Solr?
I'd like to provide a hierarchical faceting functionality.
An example would be location drill down such as USA -> New York -> New York
City -> SoHo
The number of levels can be arbitrary. One way to handle this could be to use a
special character as separator, store values such as "USA|New York|
My documents have a field "expiration" that is the expiration date of that doc.
I want to give a boost to all documents that haven't expired. I still want to
have expired documents returned, but unexpired documents should be given
priority.
Ideally the boost amount for all unexpired documents
gt; date range. Check out the 'boost query' feature of dismax.
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/CDRG_ch07_7.4.2.9
>
> It's also possible with the standard query parser but a
> pain in the neck:
>
> (value)^2 OR (NOT value)
>
&g
How do I set up and use this external file?
Can I still use such a field in fq or boost?
Can you point me to the right documentation? Thanks
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Lance Norskog wrote:
From: Lance Norskog
Subject: Re: Solr usage with Auctions/Classifieds?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: We
This read more like a PR release or product brochure for jetty than anything
else.
Then I poked around the website and realized why: it was written by the creator
of Jetty, and is hosted on the website of a company with the slogan "The Java
Experts behind Jetty"
--- On Wed, 2/17/10, g...@littl
The Solr documentation feels more like a reference guide detailing all the
API's. It's great for more advanced users, but as a beginner I often feel lost
reading the doc.
It would be really helpful to have a more step-by-step, tutorial approach in
the doc showing how to do things with tips & tr
1) Built-in hierarchical faceting
Right now there're 2 patches, SOLR-64 and SOLR-792. SOLR-64 seems to be slated
for 1.5 release but according to the wiki seems to have poor performance.
SOLR-792 has better performance according to the wiki but it's unclear if it'll
ever be part of the Solr dist
I read that a simple way to implement hierarchical facet is to concatenate
strings with a separator. Something like "level1>level2>level3" with ">" as the
separator.
A problem with this approach is that the number of facet values will greatly
increase.
For example I have a facet "Location" wit
Oops. Sorry about that.
I'll start a fresh one.
--- On Mon, 3/1/10, Chris Hostetter wrote:
From: Chris Hostetter
Subject: Re: Implementing hierarchical facet
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, March 1, 2010, 11:36 PM
: Subject: Implementing hierarchical facet
: In-Reply-To: <4b8c7
(repost with a fresh email)
I read that a simple way to implement hierarchical facet is to
concatenate strings with a separator. Something like
"level1>level2>level3" with ">" as the separator.
A problem with this approach is that the number of facet values will greatly
increase.
For
example I
fq=countryid:
>
> grab the resulting facat and drop it under "Location"
>
> pros:
> - reusing fq's (good performance, I've never used hierarchical facets, but
> would be surprised if it has a (major) speed increase to this method)
> - flexible (you g
d and encode the hierarchy level in the
fieldname:
using:
&facet=on&facet.field={!key=Location}_loc_hier_city&fq=_loc_hier_country:
...
adding cityarea later for instance would be as simple as:
&facet=on&facet.field={!key=Location}_loc_hier_cityarea&fq=_loc_hier_city:
Chee
I have a facet field whose values are created by users. So potentially there
could be a very large number of values. is that going to be a problem
performance-wise?
A few more questions to help me understand how facet works:
- after the filter cache warmed up, will the (if any) performance probl
There's a field "A" I want to facet on.
Some documents have no value for field "A". So they wouldn't show up in the
list of facet value options.
I want to find a way to let users to find those documents. One way is to make
Null an option the users can choose, something like:
value1 (4558)
valu
@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 7:13 PM
This query will find them: *:* AND -A:[* TO *]
The '*:* AND' is to get around a weird quirk of Lucene. "Minus field
range star TO star" is the trick.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Andy wrote:
> There's a field &quo
Yes. Thank you.
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
From: Koji Sekiguchi
Subject: Re: facet on null value
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 7:21 PM
Andy wrote:
> There's a field "A" I want to facet on.
>
> Some documents have no valu
What would the response look like with this query?
Can you give an example?
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Chris Hostetter wrote:
From: Chris Hostetter
Subject: Re: facet on null value
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 8:40 PM
: > I want to find a way to let users to find t
t.field=features&facet.missing=on
>
> Now, change facet.missing=on to =off. There is no change. You get all
> of the 0-valued facets anyway.
>
> What exactly is facet.missing supposed to do with this query?
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Andy wrote:
>> What would the
My understanding is that too many facet values will decrease performance
How many is too many? Are there any rules of thumb for this?
2 related questions:
- I expect a facet field to have many values (values are user generated), any
thing I can do to minimize the performance impact?
- Any way
values are too many?
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Date: Friday, March 19, 2010, 9:07 AM
On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Andy wrote:
> My understanding is that too many facet values will decrease performance
>
> How many is too many? Are there any rules of thumb for t
Reading through this thread and SOLR-1316, there seems to be a lot of different
ways to implement auto-complete in Solr. I've seen the mentions of:
EdgeNGrams
TermsComponent
Faceting
TST
Patricia Tries
RadixTree
DAWG
Which algorthm does SOLR-1316 implement? TST is one. There are others mentioned
Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Andy
> wrote:
> >
> >> Reading through this thread and SOLR-1316, there
> seems to be a lot of
> >> different ways to implement auto-complete in Solr.
> I've seen the mentions
> >> of:
> >>
> >>
Just wanted to know if anyone has used LucidWorks Solr.
- How do you compare it to the standard Apache Solr?
- the non-blocking IO of LucidWorks Solr -- is that for networking IO or disk
IO? what are its effects?
- LucidWorks website also talked about "significantly improved faceting
performa
--- On Sun, 4/18/10, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> Sure, but I'm biased. ;-) Hopefully, you will find it
> useful, but choose the one that best fits your needs (and
> let me know if you need help assessing that.)
>
Thanks for the explanation Grant.
WHat is the advantage of KStem over the sta
ded way to deal with documents in multiple languages?
--- On Mon, 4/19/10, MitchK wrote:
> From: MitchK
> Subject: Re: LucidWorks Solr
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 4:36 AM
>
> Andy, I think it is important to know what a stemmer reall
gt;
> Works great. 100% of the time.
>
> Just a tip from me.
>
>
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 00:36 -0800, MitchK wrote:
>
> > Andy, I think it is important to know what a stemmer
> really is.
> >
> > It reduces words to their infinitves. Those
> infinitives
I'm setting up my Solr index to be updated every x minutes.
Does Solr cache the result of a search, and then when next time the same search
is requested, it'd recognize that the Index has not changed and therefore just
return the previous result from cache without processing the search again?
I
> Andy,
>
> This will help with smooth injection of your multilingual
> documents into Solr (multilingual either in the sense of 1
> doc containing fields in multiple languages or 1 index
> containing documents in different languages):
>
> http://sematext.com/produ
Lucandra stores Solr index in Cassandra. What is the advantage of that compared
to regular Solr?
Anyone with experience with Lucandra Solr they can share?
I want to facet over a field "group".
Since "group" is created by users, potentially there can be a huge number of
values for "group".
- Would Solr be able to handle a use case like this? Or is Solr not really
appropriate for facet fields with a large number of values?
- I understand that I ca
Thanks.
Do I need to configure Solr to use the uninverted algorithm or is it the
default algorithm?
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Marc Sturlese wrote:
> From: Marc Sturlese
> Subject: Re: How well does Solr scale over large number of facet values?
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, Ma
FacetParameters#facet.method)
facet.method=fc is faster when a field has many unique terms. So how come enum,
not fc, is faster in this case?
Also why use filterCache less?
Thanks
Andy
--- On Fri, 6/4/10, Furkan Kuru wrote:
> From: Furkan Kuru
> Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as i
> the unique term
> count was nearly 1 M. I don't know exactly but average term
> count per
> document text can be 10 in my case.
>
> I think I still do not get why facet.method=enum is
> faster.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Yonik Seeley
> wrot
Yonik,
Is there any documentation where I can read more about the big core + small
core setup?
One issue for me is that I don't just add new documents. Many of the changes is
to update existing documents, such as updating the popularity score of the
documents. Would the big core + small core s
I want to try out the bobo plugin for Solr, which is a custom request handler
(http://code.google.com/p/bobo-browse/wiki/SolrIntegration).
At the same time I want to use BoostQParserPlugin to boost my queries,
something like {!boost b=log(popularity)}foo
Can I use the {!boost} feature in conj
ample for using dismax:
>
> {!boost b=log(popularity) defType=dismax}foo
>
> I do this with a custom handler that I have implemented fro
> my app.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Andy
> wrote:
>
> > I want to try out the bobo p
we use solrcloud with version 5.2.1,openjdk 1.8,we have multiple solr
machines, one of them keep increasing thread count ,I saw from
http://xx:xxx/solr/#/~threads page, I found that a lot of
[java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$FairSync@x] threads,
the detail info like this:
update about 3000 docs per minute ,but other solr instance is running
normally
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I also met the same problem, could you tell me why? Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Storing-positions-and-offsets-vs-FieldType-IndexOptions-DOCS-AND-FREQS-AND-POSITIONS-AND-OFFSETS-tp4061354p4208875.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive a
Hello,
I have am somewhat of a novice when it comes to using SOLR in a distributed
SolrCloud environment. My team and I are doing development work with a SOLR
core. We will shortly be transitioning over to a SolrCloud environment.
My question specifically has to do with Facets in a SOLR cloud/c
Hello,
I am using the eDisMax parser and have the following question.
With the eDisMax parser we can pass a query, q="brown and mazda", and
configure a bunch of fields in a solrconfig.xml SearchHandler to query on as
"qf". Let's say I have a SOLR schema.xml with the following fields:
and the
evant
here. Are there other reasons not to use the embedded Zookeeper?
More generally, are there downsides to using SolrCloud with a single
Zookeeper node and single Solr node?
Would appreciate any feedback.
Thanks,
Andy
Hello,
I am guessing that what I am looking for is probably going to require extending
StandardTokenizerFactory or ClassicTokenizerFactory. But I thought I would ask
the group here before attempting this. We are indexing documents from an
eclectic set of sources. There is, however, a heavy inter
just converted to a range query internally), and it fails to show up in the
Negative or Positive intervals either.
Any ideas what is going on, and if there is anything I can do to get this
to work correctly? I am using Solr 5.3.1. I've pasted the output from the
Solr Admin UI query b
e the same issue will occur
in 6.2.1.
How should I proceed from here?
Thanks,
- Andy -
private int compareStart(FacetInterval o1, FacetInterval o2) {
if (o1.start == null) {
if (o2.start == null) {
return 0;
}
return -1;
}
i
last 24 hours
("[NOW-1DAYS,NOW]"), but be aware that when you subsequently restrict your
query using one of these intervals using NOW without rounding has a
negative impact on the filter query cache (see
https://dzone.com/articles/solr-date-math-now-and-filter for a better
explanation than I
e q.op setting?
More details:
- Using the standard query parser
- The fieldType of the ctindex field is "string"
- I upgraded to 6.5 by copying my 5.3 config files over, updating the
schema version to 1.6 in the schema.xml, updating the luceneMatchVersion to
6.5.0 in the solrconfig.xml, and building a brand new index.
Thanks,
- Andy -
lue is
present. And then changing the filter query to:
fq=ctindex_populated:false OR ctindex:myId
Would this be more efficient than your proposed filter query?
Thanks again,
- Andy -
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/26/2017 1:04 PM, Andy C wrote:
> > I'm looking at upgra
Hi folks,
My application requires tracking a daily performance metric for all
documents. I start tracking for an 18 month window from the time a doc is
indexed, so each doc will have ~548 of these fields. I have in my schema a
dynamic field to capture this requirement:
Example:
metric_2014_06_
suggestion based on
negative performance implications of having to read and rewrite all
previous fields for a document when doing atomic updates? Or are there
additional inherent negatives to using lots of dynamic fields?
Andy
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Jared Whiklo
wrote:
> This is pro
different (and
expected) results, while the query doesn't affect the results at all in
4.5. Is there any known join query behavior differences/fixes between 4.2
and 4.5 that might explain this, or should I be looking at other factors?
Thanks,
Andy Pickler
results,
which tells me obviously it is having no effect.
Is there a change to the join query behavior between these releases, or
could I have configured something differently in my 4.5.1 install?
Thanks,
Andy Pickler
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Andy Pickler wrote:
> We're attempting
ld "#Month:July", even though it's
included in the highlighting section. I've tried changing various
highlighting parameters to no avail. Could someone help me know where to
look for why the pre/post aren't being applied?
Thanks,
Andy Pickler
Hi folks,
Using Solr 4.6.0 in a cloud configuration, I'm developing a SearchComponent
that generates a custom score for each document. Its operational flow
looks like this:
1. The score is derived from an analysis of search results coming out of
the QueryComponent. Therefore, the component is i
I am trying to pass a string of Japanese characters to an Apache Solr
query. The string in question is '製品'.
When a search is passed without any arguments, it brings up all of the
indexed information, including all of the documents that have this
particular string in them, however when this parame
Hi folks,
I have a DelegatingCollector installed via a PostFilter (kind of like an
AnalyticsQuery) that needs the document score to a) add to a collection of
score-based stats, and b) decide whether to keep the document based on the
score.
If I keep the document, I call super.collect() (where sup
sub-entity column
in different nest levels of the XML to no avail. I'm curious if we're
trying something that is just not supported or whether we are just trying
the wrong things.
Thanks,
Andy Pickler
n the Solr index.
I don't think any of this helps you identify my problem, but I tried to
address your questions.
Thanks,
Andy
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 20:29, Andy Pickler wrote:
> > Solr 4.1.0
> >
> > We've been using the
That's exactly what turned out to be the problem. We thought we had
already tried that permutation but apparently hadn't. I know it's obvious
in retrospect. Thanks for the suggestion.
Thanks,
Andy Pickler
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> On T
On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> This is primarily to Andy Lester, who wrote the WebService::Solr module
> on CPAN, but I'll take a response from anyone who knows what I can do.
>
> If I use the following Perl code, I get an error.
What error do you get? Ne
101 - 200 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
