solr indexing taking too much time .
What should i do to reduce time . working on solr 4.0.
Please provide the basic steps to resolve the issue
Getting following error
Full Import failed:java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Could
not load driver: com.mysql.jdbc.Driver Processing Document # 1
gt; Looks like a custom driver. Is the driver name correct? Is the library
> declared in solrconfig.xml? Is the library path correct (use absolute
> path if in doubt).
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
>
> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> htt
Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 19 March 2015 at 01:00, abhishek tiwari wrote:
> > Alex thanks for replying
> > my solrconfig :
> >
> >
> <
>
ed="true" stored="true"
multiValued="true"/><
field name="speaker_configuration" type="text_path_new" indexed="true"
stored="true" multiValued="true"/> id <
copyField so
We are doing spatial search. with following logic.
a) There are shops in a city . Each provides the facility of home delivery
b) each shop has different max_delivery_distance .
Now my query is suppose some one is searching from point P1 with radius R.
User wants the result of shops those can del
r an AND or an OR?
>
> Or at least fully express those two queries, unambiguously in plain
> English. There is too much ambiguity present to give you any solid
> direction.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Abhishek tiwari
> Sent: Wednesday, January
data ( stored data) to reduce
RDBMS query..
please suggest me how to proceed for schema design.. single core or
multiple core for each entity?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 6 March 2012 18:01, Abhishek tiwari
> wrote:
> > i am new in solr want help in
; 2. Each result is a document in Solr.
> 3. Each displayed item is a stored field in Solr.
> 4. Each searched item is an indexed field in Solr.
>
> It may help to think of this as a big flat materialized view in your DBMS.
>
> wunder
> Search Guy, Chegg.com
>
> On
schema ?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> You should create multiple cores when each core is an independent search.
> If you have three separate search pages, you may want three separate cores.
>
> wunder
> Search Guy, Chegg.com
>
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:4
, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 8 March 2012 10:40, Abhishek tiwari
> wrote:
> > my page have layout in following manner
> > *All tab* :which will contain all entities (Establishment/Event/Movie)
> > Establishment: contain Establishment search results
>
with title "Striker".
So which one is better:
- 3 queries to independent cores and clubbing data
- Single query to one core which contains all the data.
Thanks
Abhishek
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 8 March 2012 11:05, Abhishek tiwari
> wrote
Hi ,
i have multi valued field want to sort the docs order the particular
text eq:'B1' is added.
how i should query? ad_text is multivalued field.
t
B1
B2
B3
B2
B1
B3
B1
B2
B3
B3
B2
B1
e document is something you'd
> have to do when you index, Solr doesn't rearrange the
> contents of a document.
>
> If all you want to do is display the results within the document
> in order, your app can do that as it builds the display page.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
s either,
> sorry.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Abhishek tiwari
> wrote:
> > a) No. i do not want to sort the content within document .
> > I want to sort the documents .
> > b) As i have explained i have result set( documents ) and
that supports the "termfreq" function.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Abhishek tiwari
> wrote:
> >
> http://xyz.com:8080/newschema/mainsearch/select/?q=*%3A*&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&sort=termfreq%28cuisine_pr
16 matches
Mail list logo