Having a large number of fields is not the same as having a large number of
facets. To facets are something you would display to users as aid for query
refinement or navigation. There is no way for a user to use 3700 facets at
the same time. So it more of question on how to determine what facets t
Are your product_name* fields numeric fields (integer or float)?
Dals wrote:
>
> Hi...
>
> Is there any way to group values like shopping.yahoo.com or
> shopper.cnet.com do?
>
> For instance, I have documents like:
>
> doc1 - product_name1 - value1
> doc2 - product_name1 - value2
> doc3 - p
Yes. I think would be very helpful tool for tunning search relevancy - you
can do a controlled experiment with your target audiences to understand
their responses to the parameter changes. We plan to use this feature to
benchmark Lucene/SOLR against our in-house commercial search engine - it
will
For Data Import Handler, there is a way to dump data to a SOLR feed format
XML file?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/DIH---Export-to-XML-tp26138213p26138213.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have a field named "last-modified" that I like to use in bf (Boot
Functions) parameter:
recip(rord(last-modified),1,1000,1000) in DisMaxRequestHander.
However the Solr query parser complain about the syntax of the formula. I
think it is related with hyphen in the field name. I have tried to add
Maybe you want to try with docNumber field type as "string" and see it would
make a difference.
CB-PO wrote:
>
> I'm not quite sure what logs you are talking about, but in the
> tomcat/logs/catalina.out logs, i found the following [note, i can't
> copy/paste, so i am typing up a summary]:
>
>
It took me a while to understand that to use the Template Transfomer
(http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/handler/dataimport/TemplateTransformer.html),
all building variable names (e.g. ${e.firstName} ${e.lastName} etc). can not
contain null values. I hope the parser can do a better
Can someone help providing a tutorial like introduction on how to get
spell-checking work in Solr. It appears many steps are requires before the
spell-checkering functions can be used. It also appears that a dictionary (a
list of correctly spelled words) is required to setup the spell checker. Can
dictionary or
word list?
Please help.
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> Have you gone through: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Yao Ge wrote:
>
>>
>> Can someone help providing a tutorial like introduction on how to get
>
pos that I need to run spell check on. But how can these original
data be used as a base for spell checking? How does Solr know what are
correctly spelled words?
...
...
Yao Ge wrote:
>
> Can someone help providing a tutorial like introduction on how to get
>
t; into so called n-grams. You can see that if you open up the SC index with
> something like Luke. Please see
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/SpellChecker .
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original
I am index a database with over 1 millions rows. Two of fields contain
unstructured text but size of each fields is limited (256 characters).
I come up with an idea to use visualize the text fields using text cloud by
turning the two text fields in facets. The weight of font and size is of
each
Yes. I am using 1.3. When is 1.4 due for release?
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> Are you using Solr 1.3?
> You might want to try the latest 1.4 test build - faceting has changed a
> lot.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:01 PM
If I want use OR operator with mutile query filters, I can do:
fq=popularity:[10 TO *] OR section:0
Is there a more effecient alternative to this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Query-Filter-fq-with-OR-operator-tp23895837p23895837.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing li
over top N docs might be more attractive. Another features I can
really appreciate is to provide search time n-gram term clustering. Maybe
this might be better suited for "spell checker" as it just a different way
to display the alternative search terms.
-Yao
Michael Ludwig-4 wrote:
&
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Yao Ge
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2009 3:46:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: Faceting on text fields
>>
FYI. I did a direct integration with Carrot2 with Solrj with a separate Ajax
call from UI for top 100 hits to clusters terms in the two text fields. It
gots comparable performance to other facets in terms of response time.
In terms of algorithms, their listed two "Lingo" and "STC" which I don't
/download.html).
Yao Ge wrote:
>
> FYI. I did a direct integration with Carrot2 with Solrj with a separate
> Ajax call from UI for top 100 hits to clusters terms in the two text
> fields. It gots comparable performance to other facets in terms of
> response time.
>
> In terms of alg
I will like to submit a JIRA issue for this. Can anyone help me on where to
go?
-Yao
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
>
> Brian,
>
> Opening a JIRA issue if it doesn't already exist is the best way. If you
> can provide a patch, even better!
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Luc
Does Solr support faceting on MoreLikeThis search results?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Faceting-with-MoreLikeThis-tp24356166p24356166.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I could not find any support from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis on
how to restrict MLT results to certain subsets. I passed along a fq
parameter and it is ignored. Since we can not incorporate the filters in the
query itself which is used to retrieve the target for similarity comparison
; In additional to restricting the results, I am also looking to
>> >> influence
>> >> > the
>> >> > scores similar to the way boost query (bq) works in the
>> >> > DisMaxRequestHandler.
>> >> >
>> >> &
The answer to my owner question:
...
...
would work.
-Yao
Yao Ge wrote:
>
> I am not sure about the parameters for MLT the requestHandler plugin. Can
> one of you share the solrconfig.xml entry for MLT? Thanks in advance.
> -Yao
>
>
> Bill Au wrote:
>
faceting remains the same as standard
request handler.
-Yao
Yao Ge wrote:
>
> Does Solr support faceting on MoreLikeThis search results?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Faceting-with-MoreLikeThis-tp24356166p24380459.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a
use Solr's Filter Query parameter "fq":
fq=x:[10 TO 100]&fq=y:[20 TO 300]&fl=title
-Yao
huenzhao wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> Suppose that my index have 3 fields: title, x and y.
>
> I know one range(10 < x < 100) can query liks this:
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=x:[10 TO 100]&fl=title
Try with fl=* or fl=*,score added to your request string.
-Yao
Yang Lin-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have some problems.
> For my solr progame, I want to type only the Query String and get all
> field
> result that includ the Query String. But now I can't get any result
> without
> specified field. For
A couple of things, your mlt.fl value, must be part of fl. In this case,
content_mlt is not included in fl.
I think the fl parameter value need to be comma separated. try
fl=title,author,content_mlt,score
-Yao
SergeyG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently, while implementing the MoreLikeThis search, I'v
I am struggling with the concept of delta import in DIH. According the to
documentation, the delta import will automatically record the last index
time stamp and make it available to use for the delta query. However in many
case when the last_modified date time stamp in the database lag behind the
It appears the hl.maxAlternateFieldLength parameter default setting in
solrconfig.xml does not take effect. I can only get it to work by explicitly
sending the parameter via the client request. It is not big deal but it
appears to be a bug.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/
29 matches
Mail list logo