Doing spatial search on multiple location points

to make it work without hitting solr for each of the lat-long and then collating results. Thanks in advance. -- Varun Gupta

Re: Doing spatial search on multiple location points

? How will I get the geodist based on the closest matching lat-long point. Thanks in advance. -- Varun Gupta On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote: > Absolutely. The most straight-forward approach is to use the default > query parser comprised of OR clauses of geofilt q

Using ExternalFileField on SolrCloud

ing into some other way to sync the file to all solr instances. -- Thanks Varun Gupta

Getting min and max of a solr field for each group while doing field collapsing/result grouping

with Solr. Thanks in Advance! -- Varun Gupta

Re: Getting min and max of a solr field for each group while doing field collapsing/result grouping

Hi Ahmet, Thanks for the information! But as per Solr documentation, group.truncate is not supported in distributed searches and I am looking for a solution that can work on SolrCloud. -- Varun Gupta On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > Hi Varun, > > I think yo

Add a new replica to SolrCloud

Solr 4.8. Is there some way to add a new replica in Solr 4.7.2? -- Thanks Varun Gupta

How do I this in Solr?

nain "samsung", "GPS", "andriod" and "samsung andriod". Is there a way to do this in Solr. -- Thanks Varun Gupta

Re: How do I this in Solr?

Thanks everybody for the inputs. Looks like Steven's solution is the closest one but will lead to performance issues when the query string has many terms. I will try to implement the two filters suggested by Steven and see how the performance matches up. -- Thanks Varun Gupta On Wed, O

Re: How do I this in Solr?

first? Can I use term frequency to do such kind of thing? -- Thanks Varun Gupta On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Mike Sokolov wrote: > Yes I missed that requirement (as Steven also pointed out in a private > e-mail). I now agree that the combinatorics are required. > > Another possib

Re: How do I this in Solr?

I haven't been able to work on it because of some other commitments. The MemoryIndex approach seems promising. Only thing I will have to check is the memory requirement as I have close to 2 million documents. Will let you know if I can make it work. Thanks a lot! -- Varun Gupta On Sat,

Showing few results for each category (facet)

category. But this will be very inefficient. Is there any way I can do this ? Thanks & Regards, Varun Gupta

Re: Showing few results for each category (facet)

Thanks Matt!! I will take a look at the patch for field collapsing. Thanks Marian for pointing that out. If the field collapse does not work then I will have to rely on solr caching. Thanks, Varun Gupta On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Matt Weber wrote: > So, you want to display 5 resu

SpellCheck Index not building

0.7 jarowinkler a_spell org.apache.lucene.search.spell.JaroWinklerDistance ./spellchecker_a_spell 0.7 -- Thanks Varun Gupta

Re: SpellCheck Index not building

No, there are no exceptions in the logs. -- Thanks Varun Gupta On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Varun Gupta > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am using Solr 1.3 for spell checki

Results after using Field Collapsing are not matching the results without using Field Collapsing

efore collapse.threshold=3 -- Thanks Varun Gupta

Re: Results after using Field Collapsing are not matching the results without using Field Collapsing

field=ctype&qt=contentsearch I append "&fq=ctype:1" to the above queries when trying to get results for a particular category. -- Thanks Varun Gupta On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Martijn v Groningen < martijn.is.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Varun, > > Can you send the

Re: Results after using Field Collapsing are not matching the results without using Field Collapsing

am not using the latest solr nightly build. Can that cause any problem? -- Thanks Varun Gupta On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Martijn v Groningen < martijn.is.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > I tried to reproduce a similar situation here, but I got the expected > and correct results.

Re: Results after using Field Collapsing are not matching the results without using Field Collapsing

When I used collapse.threshold=1, out of the 5 categories 4 had the same top result, but 1 category had a different result (it was the 3rd result coming for that category when I used threshold as 3). -- Thanks, Varun Gupta On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Martijn v Groningen < martijn.i

Re: Results after using Field Collapsing are not matching the results without using Field Collapsing

ng is not done based on score. @Martijn: Is what I am right or I should use field collapsing in some other way. Else, what is the ideal fix for this problem (I am not an active developer, so can't say the fix that I do will not break anything). -- Thanks, Varun Gupta On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 a

Re: Results after using Field Collapsing are not matching the results without using Field Collapsing

Hi Martijn, Yes, it is working after making these changes. -- Thanks Varun Gupta On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Martijn v Groningen < martijn.is.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Varun, > > Yes, after going over the code I think you are right. If you change > the fol