we look forward to using this in the near future on our site!
Go opensource!
--tracey jaquith
[We are most interested in always having "title", "description", and a
few other
fields boosted. We have both user queries of phrases/words as well as
"field-specific" q
Hi Yonik!
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 12/5/06, Tracey Jaquith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick intro. Server Engineer at Internet Archive.
I just spent a mere 3 days porting nearly our entire site to use your
*wonderful* project!
I, too, am looking for a kind of "boosting".
If I
ll, too
8-)
thanks!!
--t
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 12/5/06, Tracey Jaquith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Now I have one new mystery that's popped up
for me.
With std req handler, this simple query
q=title:commute
is *not* returning me all documents that have the word &qu
escription:"[clause]"^10 text:"[clause]"^1
fore each clause will work the best for us.
Is there any lucene or solr class / method that can break up
a string into clauses (eg: split on AND, OR, NOT, ()s, etc.)?
--tracey
Mike Klaas wrote:
On 12/5/06, Tracey Jaquith <[EMA
oh, and yes, i've always understood, thankfully, that queries
of
"q=commute&fl=title"
and
"q=title:commute&fl=title"
are *quite* different
(but that is probably mostly due to my prior experience with
lucene with our current broken SE 8-)
-t
Mike Klaas
...so i'm pretty sure you could just use...
-Hoss
--
--Tracey Jaquith - http://www.archive.org/~tracey
--
ahh, after rereading this about 20 times today 8-)
i think i finally "get it" (your final question below).
if i do index-time boosts, and search only "text" (default field)
the boosts will propogate into "text", but only insofar that the
document will weight higher when a phrase is found in the "
, 2006 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: Result: numFound inaccuracies
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
start is 0 based :-)
Man do I feel dumb!
Andrew
--
--Tracey Jaquith - http://www.archive.org/~tracey
--
Despite considerations of stemming and such for "text"
type fields, is it the case that
if we have a single value "text" type field,
will sorting work, though?
--tracey
On 9/11/06, Tom Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks also for the "multiValued" explanation, this is useful for
my curr
e to use Solr if possible.
thanks!
--tracey
--
--Tracey Jaquith - http://www.archive.org/~tracey
--
interesting!
Code-searching for relevant lucene classes led me to try adding
to my solrconfig.xml
This allowed me to try this request...
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?rows=0&qt=test&q=fields
which I think gets me (2) below.
--tracey
Tracey Jaquith wrote:
#x27;s written code is opensource,
as is *all* the third-party code we use!
So go SOLR and thank you SO much for keeping it open, keeping it real,
and for *saving our site*!
Thanks for the great mail list and all the continual work, updating,
and thinking the Solr
team continues to do. We have all been greatly impressed by this
project and it has worked out
better than we had hoped!
--
* --Tracey Jaquith - http://www.archive.org/~tracey
<http://www.archive.org/%7Etracey> --*
Message
From: Tracey Jaquith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:12:44 AM
Subject: INTERNET ARCHIVE goes SOLR!
Internet Archive on Monday afternoon switched over to SOLR!
We converted from a badly deteriorating "home grown" s
alter Underwood wrote:
On 1/27/07 1:12 PM, "Tracey Jaquith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* To be fair, Michael StAck (our greatest help for prior SE "life support")
has smartly pointed out that by making a smarter schema and strategy,
I could reduce the number o
14 matches
Mail list logo
