Hi everyone,
I've been working on an installation recently which uses SolrCloud to index
45M documents into 8 shards on 2 VMs running 64-bit Ubuntu (with another 2
identical VMs set up for replicas). The reason we're using so many shards
for a relatively small index is that there are complex filte
Boogie, Shawn,
Thanks for the replies. I'm going to try out some of your suggestions
today. Although, without more RAM I'm not that optimistic..
Tom
On 21 October 2013 18:40, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 9:48 AM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
Just tried it with no other changes than upping the RAM to 128GB total, and
it's flying. I think that proves that RAM is good. =) Will implement
suggested changes later, though.
cheers,
Tom
On 22 October 2013 09:04, Tom Mortimer wrote:
> Boogie, Shawn,
>
> Thanks for the repl
Hi,
I'm using eDisMax query parser, and need to support Boolean operators AND
and OR. It seems from testing that these are *not* case sensitive, e.g.
setting mm to 0, "oscar AND wilde" returns the same results as "oscar and
wilde" (15 hits) while "oscar foo wilde" returns the same results as "osca
Oh, good grief - I was just reading that page, how did I miss that? *derp*
Thanks Shawn!!!
Tom
On 6 November 2013 18:59, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/6/2013 11:46 AM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
>
>> I'm using eDisMax query parser, and need to support Boolean operators AND
>>
Hi all,
Thanks for the help and advice I've got here so far!
Another question - I want to support stopwords at search time, so that e.g.
the query "oscar and wilde" is equivalent to "oscar wilde" (this is with
lowercaseOperators=false). Fair enough, I have stopword "and" in the query
analyser cha
Ah, thanks Markus. I think I'll just add the Boolean operators to the
stopwords list in that case.
Tom
On 7 November 2013 12:01, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> This is an ancient problem. The issue here is your mm-parameter, it gets
> confused because for separate fields different amount of tokens ar
Hi Eric,
Solr configuration can certainly be confusing at first. And for some time
after. :P
If you're running start.jar from the example folder (which is fine for
testing, and I've known some people to use it for production systems) then
the default solr home is example/solr. This contains solr
Hi everyone,
I've got a problem where I have docs with a source_id field, and there can be
many docs from each source. Searches will typically return docs from many
sources. I want to restrict the number of docs from each source in results, so
there will be no more than (say) 3 docs from source
t;
>
>
> On 12/05/2012 12:04 PM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've got a problem where I have docs with a source_id field, and there can
>> be many docs from each source. Searches will typically return docs from many
>> sources. I want to
p.main=true
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
>
>> Sounds like it's worth a try! Thanks Andre.
>> Tom
>>
>> On 5 Dec 2012, at 17:49, Andre Bois-Crettez wrote:
>>
>>> If you do grouping on source_id, it should be enoug
Hi,
Here's my problem: I'm indexing a corpus with text in a variety of
languages. I'm planning to detect these at index time and send the
text to one of a suitably-configured field (e.g. "mytext_de" for
German, "mytext_cjk" for Chinese/Japanese/Korean etc.)
At search time I want to search all of
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
one of several fields configured appropriately (e.g. "cv_text_en") and
then copying it to a common field for storage and display ("cv_text").
The relevant fragme
I guess what I'm asking is - can Solr highlight non-indexed fields?
Tom
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
> field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
> on
Problem solved. *bangs head on desk*
T
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
> field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
> one of several fields configured approp
Hi,
Apologies if this is really basic. I'm trying to learn how to create a
custom request handler, so I wrote the minimal class (attached), compiled
and jar'd it, and placed it in example/lib. I added this to solrconfig.xml:
When I started Solr with java -jar start.jar, I got this:
...
n "Flax"; }
public String getVersion() { return "Flax"; }
}
On 10 August 2011 16:43, simon wrote:
> Th attachment isn't showing up (in gmail, at least). Can you inline
> the relevant bits of code ?
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
>
You can use solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory in an analyser chain for both
indexing and queries. The schema.xml supplied with example has several field
types using this (including "text_general").
Tom
On 10 August 2011 16:42, nagarjuna wrote:
> Hi please help me ..
>how to ignore case w
ib, added the config
> line to solrconfig.
>
> when I send a /flaxtest request i get
>
>
>
> 0
> 16
>
> Hello!
>
>
> I was doing this within a core defined in solr.xml
>
> -Simon
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
&g
'ant dist'
>
> I'd try again with a clean trunk .
>
> -Simon
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
> > Interesting.. is this in trunk (4.0)? Maybe I've broken mine somehow!
> >
> > What classpath did you use for compiling?
Hi George,
I don't think this will work. The synonyms will be added after the query is
parsed, so you'll have terms like "bed:3" rather than matching "3" against the
bed field. If I was implementing this I'd try doing some pattern matching
before passing the query to Solr, e.g.:
"3 bed
Hi,
Would this do the job? http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent
Tom
On 18 Sep 2012, at 01:36, deniz wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have a requirement or a pre=requirement for our search application.
> Basically the engine will be on a website with plenty of users and more than
> 2
I'm still not sure I understand what it is you're trying to do. Index-time or
query-time boosts would probably be neater and more predictable than multiple
field instances, though.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22field.22
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrR
Hi James,
If you don't want this field to be included in user searches, just omit it from
the search configuration (e.g. if using eDisMax parser, don't put it in the qf
list). To keep it out of search results, exclude it from the fl list. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParam
Hi all,
After reading
http://carsabi.com/car-news/2012/03/23/optimizing-solr-7x-your-search-speed/ ,
I thought I'd do my own experiments. I used 2M docs from wikipedia, indexed in
Solr 4.0 Beta on a standard EC2 large instance. I compared an unsharded and
2-shard configuration (the latter set
Before anyone asks, these results were obtained warm.
On 20 Sep 2012, at 14:39, Tom Mortimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After reading
> http://carsabi.com/car-news/2012/03/23/optimizing-solr-7x-your-search-speed/
> , I thought I'd do my own experiments. I used 2M docs from wiki
Hi Darshan,
Can you give us some more details, e.g. what do you mean by "database"? A
RDBMS? Which software? How are you indexing it (or intending to index it) to
Solr? etc...
cheers,
Tom
On 25 Sep 2012, at 09:55, darshan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>Is there any way where I can aut
Hi,
Why do you think that the indexes should be independent? What would be the
problem with using a single index and filter queries?
Tom
On 25 Sep 2012, at 03:21, 韦震宇 wrote:
> Dear all,
>The company I'm working in have a website to server more than 10
> customers, and every customer
t; -----Original Message-
> From: Tom Mortimer [mailto:tom.m.f...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:31 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AutoIndexing
>
> Hi Darshan,
>
> Can you give us some more details, e.g. what do you mean by "
29 matches
Mail list logo
