Integration Tests with SOLR 5

Hi, I noticed that not only SOLR does not deliver a WAR file anymore but also advices not to try to provide a custom WAR file that can be deployed anymore as future version may depend on custom jetty features. Until 4.10. we were able to provide a WAR file with all the plug-ins we need for e

filter groups

Hi, I have metadata and file indexed in solr. All have a different id of cause but share the same value for "returnId" if they belong to the same metadata that describes a bunch of files (1:n). When I start a search. I usually use grouping instead of join queries to keep the information wher

trigger delete on nested documents

Hi, I plan to use nested documents to group some of my fields art0001 My first article art0001-foo Smith, John author art0001-bar Power, Max reviewer This way can ask for any documents that are reviewed by Max Power. However to simplify update and deletes

Re: trigger delete on nested documents

and has some caveats: http://blog.griddynamics.com/2013/09/solr-block-join-support.html regards, Thomas On May 18, 2014, at 11:36 PM, Thomas Scheffler wrote: Hi, I plan to use nested documents to group some of my fields art0001 My first article art0001-foo Smith, John author art0001

Re: trigger delete on nested documents

nice, too. Does anyone have information how nested document support evolve in future releases of SOLR? kind regards, Thomas 19.05.2014 10:37 пользователь "Thomas Scheffler" < thomas.scheff...@uni-jena.de> написал: Hi, I plan to use nested documents to group some

Re: trigger delete on nested documents

Am 20.05.2014 14:11, schrieb Jack Krupansky: To be clear, you cannot update a single document of a nested document in place - you must reindex the whole block, parent and all children. This is because this feature relies on the underlying Lucene block join feature that requires that the documents

grouping of multivalued fields

Hi, I have a special case of grouping multivalued fields and I wonder if this is possible with SOLR. I have a field "foo" that is generally multivalued. But for a restricted set of documents this field has one value or is not present. So normally grouping should work. Sadly SOLR is failing

Re: grouping of multivalued fields

Am 21.05.2014 15:07, schrieb Joel Bernstein: You may want to investigate the group.func option. This would allow you to plug in your own logic to return the group by key. I don't think there is an existing function that does exactly what you need so you may have to write a custom function. I th

weak documents

Hi, I am relatively new to SOLR and I am looking for a neat way to implement weak documents with SOLR. Whenever a document is updated or deleted all it's dependent documents should be removed from the index. In other words they exist as long as the document exist they refer to when they were

Re: weak documents

Am 27.11.2013 09:58, schrieb Paul Libbrecht: Thomas, our experience with Curriki.org is that evaluating what I call the "related documents" is a procedure that needs access to the complete content and thus is run at the DB level and no thte sold-level. For example, if a user changes a part of i

SOLRJ and SOLR compatibility

Hi, I am one developer of a repository framework. We rely on the fact, that "SolrJ generally maintains backwards compatibility, so you can use a newer SolrJ with an older Solr, or an older SolrJ with a newer Solr." [1] This statement is not even true for bugfix releases like 4.6.0 -> 4.6.1.

Re: SOLRJ and SOLR compatibility

Am 27.02.2014 08:04, schrieb Shawn Heisey: On 2/26/2014 11:22 PM, Thomas Scheffler wrote: I am one developer of a repository framework. We rely on the fact, that "SolrJ generally maintains backwards compatibility, so you can use a newer SolrJ with an older Solr, or an older SolrJ with a

range types in SOLR

Hi, I am in the need of range types in SOLR - similar to PostgreSQL: https://wiki.postgresql.org/images/7/73/Range-types-pgopen-2012.pdf My schema should allow approximate dates and queries on that. When having a single such date per document one can split this information into two separate fi

Re: range types in SOLR

Am 01.03.14 18:24, schrieb Erick Erickson: I'm not clear what you're really after here. Solr certainly supports ranges, things like time:[* TO date_spec] or date_field:[date_spec TO date_spec] etc. There's also a really creative use of spatial (of all things) to, say answer questions involving

Re: range types in SOLR

Am 03.03.2014 19:12, schrieb Smiley, David W.: The main reference for this approach is here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialForTimeDurations Hoss’s illustrations he developed for the meetup presentation are great. However, there are bugs in the instruction — specifically it’s important to s

Re: SOLRJ and SOLR compatibility

Am 27.02.2014 09:15, schrieb Shawn Heisey: On 2/27/2014 12:49 AM, Thomas Scheffler wrote: What problems have you seen with mixing 4.6.0 and 4.6.1? It's possible that I'm completely ignorant here, but I have not heard of any. Actually bug reports arrive me that sound like "

Re: SOLRJ and SOLR compatibility

Am 04.03.2014 07:21, schrieb Thomas Scheffler: Am 27.02.2014 09:15, schrieb Shawn Heisey: On 2/27/2014 12:49 AM, Thomas Scheffler wrote: What problems have you seen with mixing 4.6.0 and 4.6.1? It's possible that I'm completely ignorant here, but I have not heard of any. Ac

Re: 7.3 appears to leak

Hi, we noticed the same problems here in a rather small setup. 40.000 metadata documents with nearly as much files that have „literal.*“ fields with it. While 7.2.1 has brought some tika issues the real problems started to appear with version 7.3.0 which are currently unresolved in 7.4.0. Memor

Memory Leak in 7.3 to 7.4

Hi, we noticed a memory leak in a rather small setup. 40.000 metadata documents with nearly as much files that have „literal.*“ fields with it. While 7.2.1 has brought some tika issues (due to a beta version) the real problems started to appear with version 7.3.0 which are currently unresolved

Re: Memory Leak in 7.3 to 7.4

ieb Vincenzo D'Amore : > > Not clear if you had experienced an OOM error. > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:06 PM Thomas Scheffler < > thomas.scheff...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we noticed a memory leak in a rather small setup. 40.000 metadata >>

Re: Memory Leak in 7.3 to 7.4

Am 02.08.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Thomas Scheffler > : > > Hi, > > we noticed a memory leak in a rather small setup. 40.000 metadata documents > with nearly as much files that have „literal.*“ fields with it. While 7.2.1 > has brought some tika issues (due to a beta version) the rea

Javadocs are not linkable

Hi, I recently noticed that the SOLR javadocs hosted by lucene are not linkable as the „package-list“ file is not downloadable. Is this on purpose? $ curl https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_4_0/solr-solrj/package-list 301 Moved Permanently Moved Permanently The document has moved https://lucene