Hey all!
In our system users can create recurring events and search for events
starting on or after a given date. Searching and filtering of events works
perfectly, but users expect the result set to be ordered by the next start
time.
For each event, we index a multi-valued date field containing
Hey Guys,
Thanks a lot for your input!
But my interpretation of "the next" start time is that it wsa dependent on
> the value of "NOW" when the query was executed (ie: some of the indexed
> values may be in the past) in which case that approach wouldn't work.
If the query was always a NOW query
Hey all,
I'm in the process of migrating a single Solr 4.0 instace to a SolrCloud
setup for availability reasons.
After studying the wiki page for SolrCloud I'm not sure what the absolute
minimum setup is that would allow for one machine to go down.
Would it be enough to have one shard with one
Thanks a lot guys!
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Yonik Seeley
> > Sent: Thu 06-Dec-2012 16:01
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Minimum HA Setup with SolrCloud
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Markus Jelsma
Hello,
I just tried up(down?)grading our current Solr 4.0 trunk setup to Solr 3.3.0
as result grouping was the only reason for us to stay with the trunk.
Everything worked like a charm except for one of our queries, where we group
results by the owning user and sort by distance.
A simplified exam
Bill Bell wrote:
> Did you add: fq={!geofilt} ??
>
> On 7/3/11 11:14 AM, "Thomas Heigl" wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I just tried up(down?)grading our current Solr 4.0 trunk setup to Solr
> >3.3.0
> >as result grouping was the only reason for us to sta
ield=user.uniqueId_s&sfield=user.location_p&pt=48.20927,16.3728&sort=geodist()
> asc
This works without a problem in my trunk build of Solr 4.0 from March 2011.
I use the standard schema.xml packaged with the Solr distribution.
Thomas
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Thomas H
How should I proceed with this problem? Should I create a JIRA issue or
should I cross-post on the dev mailing list? Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Thomas
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> My query in the unit test looks like this:
>
> q=*:*&fq=_query_:&quo
Hi Yonik,
I just created a JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2642
Thomas
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > How should I proceed with this problem? Should I create a JIRA issue or
>
Hey all,
Our production system is heavily optimized for caching and nearly all parts
of queries are satisfied by filter caches. The only filter that varies a
lot from user to user is the location and distance. Currently we use the
default location field type and index lat/long coordinates as we ge
10 matches
Mail list logo