In Solr 3.x, I was relying on a postCommit call to a listener in the update
handler to perform data update to caches, this data was used to perform
'realtime' filtering on the documents.
So something like:
...
In Solr 4.2.x, the postCommit is not called anymore on the slaves during
Just run the java agent as indicated, solr will be detected and 3 new menu
items will be available automatically on the app: solr caches, solr
updates, solr requests.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:56 AM, solr wrote:
> My question is how to check solr perfromance in newrelic.Basically we have
> ja
I'm currently looking to see what would be a decent way to implement a
scrolling window in the result set when looking for an item.
Basically, I need to find item X in the result set and return say N items
before and N items after.
< - N items -- Item X --- N items >
So I was thinking a
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Phill Tornroth wrote:
> I'm using Solr 3.5. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how to end up
> adding this extra dimension so that I can do per-user relevance? It seems
> like an oft-asked, rarely-answered question.
>
Use a function that make use of your externa
I' m using Solr 3.1 right now.
I was looking at a threadump trying to figure out why queries were not
exactly fast and noticed that it keeps parsing xml over and over from
the schema to get the lucene version.
SolrQueryParser are created for each request and in the constructor
there is a call sim
Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Stephane Bailliez wrote:
> I' m using Solr 3.1 right now.
>
> I was looking at a threadump trying to figure out why queries were not
> exactly fast and noticed that it keeps parsing xml over and over from
> the schema to get the lucene version.
>
Hi all,
I'm looking for ideas about how to best deal with a situation where I
need to deal with storing key/values pairs in the index for consumption
in the client.
Typical example would be to have a document with multiple genres where
for simplicity reasons i'd like to send both the 'id'
7;: { '': '', '': '' }
}
does that make sense ?
-- stephane
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
In the end lucene stores stuff as strings.
Even if you do store your data as map FieldType , Solr May not be able
to treat it like a map.
So it is fine to put is
Hello,
I cannot seem to find a way with the syntax to express multiple values for a
filter query.
I have documents with field 'type' : a, b, c, d and I'd like to only search
within documents a and b.
One way to do it would be to work on exclusion fq like:
fq=-type:c&fq=-type:d but then all hell
Sweet, thanks Erik !
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Stephane Bailliez wrote:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> I cannot seem to find a way with the syntax to express multiple values for
>> a
>> filter query.
>>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
