:val-2 OR group-name-3:field-3:[min-3 TO max-3])
return data:
group-name-1:field-1,field-2;groupd-name-2:field-3,field-4,...
Thanks,
Robert Yu
I want Solr return results by relevancy, but it seems it does not make
sense. For example, partial match does not return before exact match.
Even I enabled term length in schema definition.
Is there someone can provide suggestions?
For example, I want it return as the following order for ke
m: Gora Mohanty [mailto:g...@mimirtech.com]
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 12:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort issue in Solr
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Robert Yu
wrote:
> I want Solr return results by relevancy, but it seems it does not make
> sense. For example
What's status of Solr 4.0? is there anyone start to use it? I heard it
support real time update index, I'm interested in this feature.
Thanks,
________
Robert Yu
Platform Service - Backend
Morningstar Shenzhen Ltd.
Morningstar. Illuminating investing world
and c.major = "CS".
How Solr/Lucene support the above query? It seems they do not.
Thanks,
Robert Yu
Application Service - Backend
Morningstar Shenzhen Ltd.
Morningstar. Illuminating investing worldwide.
+86 755 3311-0223 voice
+86 137-2377-0925 mobile
+
er than by docid. Of course, it is
not efficient as by docid. Since Lucene had build index, I think it should
still be fast enough.
I'd like to hear your opinions on this topic.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: Robert Yu [mailto:robert...@morningstar.com]
Sent: Frid
e
if you need to.
On 27 June 2012 12:27, Robert Yu wrote:
> The ability of join operation supported as what
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join says is so limited.
> I'm thinking how to support standard join operation in Solr/Lucene because
> not all can be de-normalized e
