mation for the fields is below:
Thanks for any insight into why I broke it!
-Reece
point sigh.
Thanks for the help!
-Reece
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Erik
Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Reece wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone :)
>>
>> I was trying to purge out older things.. in this case of a certain
>> type of document that
good way to do
this and still have the "best match" ranking of the results according
to search terms entered by the users.
I was hoping someone had done something similar or would have some
insight on it.
Thanks in advance!
-Reece
-5 for each document, and took that and used it to then add a boost
to the fields I was actually searching on (or the final score) that
would probably work, is that possible?
-Reece
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Runo wrote:
> You could use a boost function to gently boost up it
Re-indexing so much would be a pretty big pain. I do have a unique
ID for each document though that I use for updating them every day as
they change.
-Reece
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> This may not be practical, as it would involve re-indexing
> al
oduct of the score and the rating?
-Reece
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Reece wrote:
> Re-indexing so much would be a pretty big pain. I do have a unique
> ID for each document though that I use for updating them every day as
> they change.
>
> -Reece
>
>
>
>
Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
-Reece
s similar to issue #1 but with a different
filter.
Here is my fieldtype I do the actual searches on:
Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
-Reece
w how it goes, but that looks like exactly what I needed.
For #3, I'll test it again tomorrow and make sure I didn't have a
mistype or something.
Thanks for the help!
-Reece
On Feb 18, 2008 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2008 5:05 PM, Yon
The omitNorms="true" attribute worked perfectly, thanks Yonik!
Also, the stopword issue isn't happening anymore, go figure. I
probably had a mistype or something as well, Thanks for the help!
-Reece
On Feb 18, 2008 7:17 PM, Reece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For #1,
are
+ - && || ! ( ) { } [ ] ^ " ~ * ? : \
To escape these character use the \ before the character. For example
to search for (1+1):2 use the query:
\(1\+1\)\:2
-Reece
On Feb 19, 2008 12:07 PM, zqzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, solr have reserved some special chars in building its queries, such
" in it to end the data tag.
-Reece
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Paul deGrandis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on a solr app that pulls HTML from an embedded JavaScript
> WYSIWYG editor, and I need to index on the content, but store and
>
Well I don't remember the specific name of it, I just wrote that
because it sounded close :)
There is a list of them here though:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
-Reece
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Paul deGrandis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tha
Sounds like the docs aren't committed maybe?
Go to /solr/admin/stats.jsp and look for:
docsPending : X
Where X is the number of docs that aren't committed yet.
-Reece
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:07 PM, x8nnn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried to verify the re
the headers.
Instead, specify it in the doctype of the XML you post.
4) Ensure it says the document was added and committed in the stats
5) search on just the id - just to verify you can find it at all.
Once you can get it to return something, you can build on that.
-Reece
On Sat, Feb 23, 2
also used the example start.jar and didn't specify any
memory constraints.
My job ran for 3 days, and finished without any errors or memory problems.
The only difference I see is that I didn't use any dynamic fields, and
I only stored 2 fields instead of them all.
Just my $0.02
-Reece
1) OR ((search string) AND type:B^10) OR etc etc
-Reece
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:18 AM, James Wiegand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> What I am trying to do is get search results sorted by content type, since
> there is an order in which results are preferred, for
Just use cdata to have the parser ignore the html characters.
http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_cdata.asp
-Reece
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Latj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> When I use HTML::Entities to encode my text, I get this error:
>
> S
18 matches
Mail list logo
