Hi, I need some recommendations w/ some issues I'm having w/ solr search
performance.
Here is my index/hardware config:
- CentOS on 8 quad core xeon processors @ 3.16 Ghz
- 32 GB RAM
- Tomcat and JAVA 1.6
- Solr 1.3
~15 million documents .
- Index size on disk is about 22 GB
- 8 quad core xeon p
Hi, thanks for responding so quickly,
>6-12 seconds seems really long and 15 million docs is nothing on a
>machine like this. Are you sure the issue is in Solr? How are you
>measuring the 6-12 seconds?
I'm looking at the value in the Solr response.
>Assuming it is Solr...
>How often are
>what is your actual query?
>Are you doing faceting / highlighting / or anything else?
I am doing faceting on 5 fields, no highlighting or anything else, debugging
is also off. A basic query that I'm doing using dismax is 'cleaning
services' over 15 million local business records.
--
View thi
>and query times without faceting are... ?
>solr's built in faceting is "simple" and has its limits. 15M is
>higher than i've seen good faceting performance out of, particularly
>multivalued fields.
>
> Erik
Hi, My facet fields are multi valued and w/o faceting the query time is
about
yes I'm using 1.3
here are the contents of debug.. I'm only pasting the first explain since
the whole debug section is very long.
cleaning services
cleaning services
-
+((DisjunctionMaxQuery((about_us:cleaning^0.7 | zip:cleaning^0.7 |
(insurances:cleaners insurances:cleaning insurances:clean)
w/ faceting qtime is around +200ms.
qtime for a standard query on the default search field is less than 100ms.
Usually around 60ms.
qtime for id: is around 16ms.
ryantxu wrote:
>
>> -
>>
>> 6727.0
>> -
>>
>> 6457.0
>>
>> -
>>
>> 0.0
>>
>> -
>
> So I take it, this is with faceting t
Hi, I need help with solving a particular problem I'm having.
I have a one box search website where users can type "cosmetic surgery
houston tx" or "cosmetic surgery 22151". I need to come up with a reliable
way to parse out the geo terms/or zipcodes from the user query so that I can
submit a qu
Hello, we’re currently in the midst of re-designing our search hardware
architecture and I have some questions about sharding and distributed
search.
1. What is the benefit of using sharding/distributed search over keeping
the
index intact?
2. What is the best approach to determinin
Hello,
I'm currently using LocalSolr in my project and coming across some
issues with making the LocalSolrQueryComponent work w/ distributed search.
I'm using version LocalSolr 2.0 and Solr 1.3. Can someone point me in the
right direction on how to modify this component to work with Distribu
Great this works.
BTW, there seems to be a problem w/ LocalSolrQueryComponent. It doesn't seem
to be respecting any filtering parameters in the solr request (fq).
thanks,
Rajiv
pjaol wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Most of the localsolr / locallucene doc's are a little out of date I'll
> get to updating
10 matches
Mail list logo