Re: Regarding LTR feature

se of the fact that it scales over all the documents and returns only the subset with the FQ filter applied. Alternatively is their any way I can scale these value during normalization time with a customized class which iterates over all the re-ranked documents only. Thanks a lot in advance.

Re: Regarding LTR feature

se of the fact that it scales over all the documents and returns only the subset with the FQ filter applied. Alternatively is their any way I can scale these value during normalization time with a customized class which iterates over all the re-ranked documents only. Thanks a lot in advance.

Configure it on server

Hi, Can you help me out how I can configure it on a server? It was configured on one of our servers but I am unable to replicate it. Can you please help. Thanks, Prateek This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy

Solr Spatial search with self-intersecting polygons

;t throw an exception. Also, a possible solution would be to include only the boundary (in case the polygon intersects at some point). Is it possible to do it on the Solr side? Thanks. -- Prateek Sachan Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

Query regarding LTR plugin in solr

educe this time. So basically I just want to scale the value which looks at the whole result set instead of just the current document. Can I have/implement something during normalization?? Thanks in advance Regards, Prateek

Query regarding LTR plugin in solr

duce this time. So basically I just want to scale the value which looks at the whole result set instead of just the current document. Can I have/implement something during normalization?? Thanks in advance Regards, Prateek

Regarding LTR feature

del%20efi.query=$q% 20reRankDocs=300%20efi.store=1}&fq=parent_store_3630_i:%201 Here the score calculation for features should only use the documents returned from these fq parameter but it's not really the case. Is it a bug or something. Thanks in advance. Regards, Prateek

Re: Regarding LTR feature

hich i think is because of the fact that it scales over all the documents and returns only the subset with the FQ filter applied. Alternatively is their any way I can scale these value during normalization time with a customized class which iterates over all the re-ranked documents only. Thanks a lot in advance. Looking forward to hearing back from you soon. Regards, Prateek

Re: Regarding LTR feature

se of the fact that it scales over all the documents and returns only the subset with the FQ filter applied. Alternatively is their any way I can scale these value during normalization time with a customized class which iterates over all the re-ranked documents only. Thanks a lot in advance. Looking forward to hearing back from you soon. Regards, Prateek

Re: Regarding LTR feature

Regards, Prateek

Re: Regarding LTR feature

tried looking at the source code to see if there is a way I can override a class so that it iterates over all the re-ranked documents and calculate Max and min there itself and pass it to MinMax normalizer class but it seems it's not possible. Your help will really appreciated. Thanks Regard

Re: Regarding LTR feature

hich match the query. Thaks a lot in advance. Looking forward to hearing back from you soon. Regards, Prateek On 2018/05/04 10:26:55, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Hi Preteek, > I would assume you have that feature at training time as well, can't you use > the training set to estab

Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

7;m really confused where all this happens. Thanks in advance. Regards, Prateek

Re: Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

the relevancy of results. Thanks for the response. Regards, Prateek

Re: Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

Hi Mikhail, I think you forgot to link the reference. Thanks Regards, Prateek On 2018/05/17 13:18:22, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Here is the reference I've found so far. > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:26 PM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com < > prateek.agar...@

Re: Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

> > > > I think you forgot to link the reference. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Regards, > > Prateek > > > > On 2018/05/17 13:18:22, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > > Here is the reference I've found so far. > > > &

schemaless vs schema based core

at is getting missed? Any inputs/experiences/pointers are welcome. Regards, Prateek

RE: schemaless vs schema based core

l have some overhead vs the other; any thoughts around this? Regards, Prateek Jain Team: Totoro Mobile: +353 894 391716 -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 January 2016 02:20 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: schemaless vs schema based core I would

Recall: schemaless vs schema based core

Prateek Jain J would like to recall the message, "schemaless vs schema based core".

RE: Close and open vendor sorting

According to me this is what you are looking for https://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent Regards, Prateek Jain Team: Totoro Mobile: +353 894 391716 -Original Message- From: irshad siddiqui [mailto:irshad.s...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 January 2016 07:32 AM To: solr-user

Using Custom Enum

dType 'operationType' specified on field changeType. I am using solr 4.8.1. Not sure which step I am missing due to which it is unable to map proper fieldType. Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: Using Custom Enum

Finally found the error. It was a typo fieldType was marked as filedType Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Prateek Jain J [mailto:prateek.j.j...@ericsson.com] Sent: 25 January 2016 12:11 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Using Custom Enum Hi, I am trying to

enum vs string performance

Hi, We have some fixed string constants in our application like eventType, sourceEvent etc. We don't have requirement of partial/wildcard search on these fields. Will there be any performance gain while inserting or querying if, we take their fieldType as EnumField in solr? Regards, Pr

dynamic fields | Naming conventions

maintainable. We know that is technically feasible but our question is, è Are there any best practices regarding naming convention of dynamic fields? If yes, are there any valid reasons? è Can there be any pit-falls in future, if we go via suffix way? Regards, Prateek Jain

Solr | index | Lock Type

runs 3 different cores in it. All cores use ${solr.lock.type:simple}. 3. We are seeing above issue while solr starts coming up for the first time. Any pointers what could be corrected here. Regards, Prateek Jain

solr | backup and restoration

ata should also be back there for example, if we want to re-create core from a snapshot. I do see there is such functionality available in later versions as, described here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Making+and+Restoring+Backups+of+SolrCores Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: solr | backup and restoration

Manually copying files under index directory fixed the issue. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Prateek Jain J [mailto:prateek.j.j...@ericsson.com] Sent: 27 April 2016 02:08 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: solr | backup and restoration Hi, We are using

index and data directories

Hi All, We are using solr 4.8.1 and would like to know if it is possible to store data and indexes in separate directories? I know following tag exist in solrconfig.xml file C:/del-it/solr/cm_events_nbi/data Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: index and data directories

Hi Alex, I am unable to get it correctly. Is it possible to store indexes and data separately? Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 November 2016 03:53 PM To: solr-user Subject: Re: index and data directories

RE: index and data directories

rated by different techniques/algorithms but data/documents remain unchanged. Please correct me if my understanding is not correct. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 November 2016 07:05 PM To: solr-user Subject: Re: i

RE: index and data directories

Thanks a lot Erick Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 November 2016 09:14 PM To: solr-user Subject: Re: index and data directories Theoretically, perhaps. And it's quite true that stored data for fields m

unable to write docs

permissions. We are using solr 4.8.1 and not using solr-cloud. Although, the error is gone after restarting solr but just curious to know what can lead to such situation. Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: unable to write docs

1. Commits are issued every 30 seconds, not on every write operation. 2. logs only has error entries saying it failed to write documents. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 November 2016 12:34 PM To: solr-user

solr | performance warning

have multiple cores running in solr, so one or the other would be commiting at some time. Any clues/pointers/suggestions? I am using solr 4.8.1. Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: solr | performance warning

Thanks EricK Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 November 2016 04:32 PM To: solr-user Subject: Re: solr | performance warning _when_ are you seeing this? I see this on startup upon occasion, and I _think_ there

RE: unable to write docs

Hi GW, It would be great if you can elaborate or provide pointers to scenarios which can cause this issue w.r.t commit problem. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: GW [mailto:thegeofo...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 November 2016 01:56 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject

RE: Solr 6 Performance Suggestions

I am not sure but I heard this in one of discussions, that you cant migrate directly from solr 4 to solr 6. It has to be incremental like solr 4 to solr 5 and then to solr 6. I might be wrong but is worth trying. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Max Bridgewater

SOLR vs mongdb

w. But I still can't understand why would anyone go for mongodb and when for SOLR (except for features like faceting, may be CAP theorem). Are there any specific use-cases for choosing NoSQL databases like mongoDB over SOLR? Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: SOLR vs mongdb

SOLR also supports, schemaless behaviour. and my question is same that, why and where should we prefer mongodb. Web search didn’t helped me on this. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Rohit Kanchan [mailto:rohitkan2...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 November 2016 07:07 PM To: solr

RE: SOLR vs mongdb

I have used Marklogic for around 6 months but its majorly used for custom ontologies and had serious issues once you start asking for more search results (other than default) in one go. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org

RE: SOLR vs mongdb

Hi Walter, With the solr support to sharding, is the storage capability still in question? Or we are only talking about features like transaction logs, which can be used to re-build database. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun

RE: OOMs in Solr

Please provide some information like, disk space available deployment model of solr like solr-cloud or single instance jvm version no. of queries and type of queries etc. GC algorithm used etc. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes [mailto:amu

RE: OOMs in Solr

You can also try following: 1. reduced stack size of thread using -Xss flag. 2. Try to use sharding instead of single large instance (if possible). 3. reduce cache size in solrconfig.xml Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes [mailto:amu

Solr | OOM

, Prateek Jain

DataImportHandler | Query | performance

(sometimes, due to other issues) We would like to know if using DataImportHandler give us any advantage? I just gave a quick glance on Solr Wiki but not clear if it offers any advantages in terms of performance (in this scenario). Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: DataImportHandler | Query | performance

Thanks a lot Shawn. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: 23 December 2016 01:36 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: DataImportHandler | Query | performance On 12/23/2016 5:15 AM, Prateek Jain J wrote: > We n

logging query received

able debug logs for org.apache.solr package (java) and enable all logging levels from solr admin UI (image attached). I am hoping there should be a simple way for achieving this and something silly is what I am missing here. [cid:image001.png@01D28917.CA388300] Regards, Prateek Jain Team: To

RE: logging query received

Thanks Alexandre, I was on a load server so, couldn't change any code but I just enabled debug logging from Admin UI and I was able to see query in solr log file; which I turned off after 5 minutes. Thanks again for full list of options available for various scenarios. Regards, Pr

Solr | cluster | behaviour

disk. My question is, why do we see activity is standby solr even if it is not serving any requests. Is there any replication of in-memory indexes between these instances? Any pointers to this are welcome. Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: Solr | cluster | behaviour

Just to update, we are using solr 4.8.1 Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Prateek Jain J Sent: 29 March 2017 10:22 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr | cluster | behaviour Hi All, We are having solr deployment in active passive mode. So, ideally only

RE: Solr | cluster | behaviour

Thanks Shawn. Regards, Prateek Jain -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: 29 March 2017 01:27 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr | cluster | behaviour On 3/29/2017 3:21 AM, Prateek Jain J wrote: > We are having solr deployment

solr read timeout

Hi All, I am using solr 4.8.1 in one of our application and sometimes it gives read timeout error. SolrJ is used from client side. How can I increase this default read timeout? Regards, Prateek Jain

cmd to enable debug logs

config.xml. Regards, Prateek Jain

RE: cmd to enable debug logs

Thanks Rahul. Regards, Prateek Jain Team: Totoro Mobile: +353 894 391716 -Original Message- From: Rahul Chhiber Sent: 09 July 2018 12:10 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: cmd to enable debug logs Use -v option in the bin/solr start command. Regards, Rahul Chhiber