address the stalling issues.
Is there something I am overlooking? Perhaps the system is becoming
oversubscribed in terms of resources? Thanks for any help that is offered.
--
Patrick O'Lone
Director of Software Development
TownNews.com
E-mail ... pol...@townnews.com
Phone 309-743-0809
Fax .. 309-743-0830
s more than that, but that just seems
> bizarre unless you're doing something like faceting and/or sorting on every
> field.
>
> -Michael
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick O'Lone [mailto:pol...@townnews.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11
nyway.
--
Patrick O'Lone
Director of Software Development
TownNews.com
E-mail ... pol...@townnews.com
Phone 309-743-0809
Fax .. 309-743-0830
ne's FieldCache which is for fcs. You can check how much time
> in millis is spend on UnInvertedField cache regeneration in INFO logs like
> "UnInverted multi-valued field ,time=### ..."
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Patrick O'Lone <mailto:pol...
size hitting the sky.
>
> Don't get bored reading the 1st (and small) introduction page of the
> article, page 2 and 3 will make lot of sense:
> http://www.drdobbs.com/jvm/g1-javas-garbage-first-garbage-collector/219401061
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Guido.
>
> On 26/11/13
ming more and
> more reliable, standard and stable.
>
> Regards,
>
> Guido.
>
> On 09/12/13 15:07, Patrick O'Lone wrote:
>> I have a new question about this issue - I create a filter queries of
>> the form:
>>
>> fq=start_time:[* TO NOW/5MINUTE]
>>
ou add the Garbage collection JVM options I suggested you?
>
> -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=50
>
> Guido.
>
> On 09/12/13 16:33, Patrick O'Lone wrote:
>> Unfortunately, in a test environment, this happens in version 4.4.0 of
>> Solr as well.
>>
>>> I
> is not the good one.
> * will be replaced by the first date in your field
>
> Try :
> fq=start_time:[NOW TO NOW+5MINUTE]
>
> Franck Brisbart
>
>
> Le lundi 09 décembre 2013 à 09:07 -0600, Patrick O'Lone a écrit :
>> I have a new question about this issue
c warming queries to your
> solrconfig.xml to warm the fieldCache before it's registered .
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Lone <mailto:pol...@townnews.com>> wrote:
>
> Well, I want to include everything will start in the next 5 minute
>
If I was to use the LFU cache instead of FastLRU on the filter cache, if
I enable auto-warming on that cache type - does it warm the most
frequently used fq on the filter cache? Thanks for any info!
--
Patrick O'Lone
Director of Software Development
TownNews.com
E-mail ... pol...@townnew
Well, I haven't tested it - if it's not ready yet I will probably avoid
for now.
> On 12/19/2013 1:46 PM, Patrick O'Lone wrote:
>> If I was to use the LFU cache instead of FastLRU on the filter cache, if
>> I enable auto-warming on that cache type - does it warm the
11 matches
Mail list logo
