n the parameter.
I tried to put hostnames instead of ip with no luck.
I tried to search in this forum and on the net but didn't find why, any idea
?
Thanks,
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr4-0-problem-zkHost-with-multiple-hosts-throws-ou
Well, if i understand the embed solr ZK is not really useable with multiple
instances spreaded across physical servers, so i've downloaded zookeeper and
installed 3 instances on my servers and it works fine, you're right mixing
zkHosts with multiple hosts and zkRun seems broken.
Than
Hi,I'd like to know how the DIH handle to update Solr. Does it update after a
specific amount of time or is there some trigger that activates the DIH every
time something is commited to the RDBMS.
It would be the best, if there is something like "realtime" synchronization
between solr and our sq
d with the documents of index1
by matching the "tag" field.
According to my tests, It looks like the "restaurant" query will always be
parsed using the Lucene QParser. I did not find a way to use another
QParser, like Dismax. Am I right or is there a way?
Thanks!
--
Pascal D
Hi,
Thanks for this! But your "partner-tmo" request handler is probably
configured with your ing-content index, no? In my case, I'd like to execute
a dismax query on the fromIndex.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Pascal:
>
> I have an issue si
instead of
"lucene". But again, is there a reason why I should not do that?
If it is ok, I could submit a patch.
Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Pascal Dimassimo <
pascal.dimass...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying Solr Join across 2 cores on the
al param will be checked (just like it can in the BoostQParser)...
>
> qf=text name
> q={!join from=manu_id_s to=id defType=dismax}ipod
>
> Note: even with that hardcoded "lucene" bug, you can still override the
> default by using var dereferencing to point at another
ave the same
fields than the one where the initial query is made.
I just notice SOLR-2824. So it is really a bug. I'll take the time to look
at the patch attached to this ticket.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Pascal Dimassimo <
pascal.dimass...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Thanks Ho
instead of null so we can
> make the defType local param syntax work? I havne't seen it in my
> email but it's really an unrelated problem so it should be tracked
> seperately)
>
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Pascal Dimassimo
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
I dit put a pdf version here:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B02DHBZQYYT_MmRkZTY0YjQtODJmZS00Mzg0LWJiNTEtOWJjNzViNmNjZjdh&hl=en&authkey=CL2Fq_QG
Zoom it to get a better view.
Pascal
2011/4/8 Andy
> Could anyone please post a version
t, such as id.
I'm seriously puzzled at this point. Am I hitting an obscure bug in 1.4 ? A
misleading error message ? Or maybe a bug in my brain ? :)
cheers
--
-o) Pascal Bleser http://www.fosdem.org
/\\ FOSDEM 2010 :: 6+7 February 2010 in Brussels
_\_v Free and Opensource Software Developers European Meeting
Hi guys,
I'm having trouble understanding the behavior of firefox and the etag.
After cleaning the cache, I send this request from firefox:
GET /solr/select/?q=television HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8088
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009011913 F
Sorry, the xml of the solrconfig.xml was lost. It is
Hi guys,
I'm having trouble understanding the behavior of firefox and the etag.
After cleaning the cache, I send this request from firefox:
GET /solr/select/?q=television HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8088
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
nding on the headers is described
here: https://developer.mozilla.org/En/HTTP_Caching_FAQ
I realize that this was a Firefox issue. Sorry to have disrupt this list.
Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>
> Sorry, the xml of the solrconfig.xml was lost. It is
>
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
&
Hi,
I've designed a "front" handler that will send request to other handlers and
return a aggregated response.
Inside this handler, I call other handlers like this (inside the method
handleRequestBody):
SolrCore core = req.getCore();
SolrRequestHandler mlt = core.getRequestHandler("/mlt");
Modi
ut is it a recommended approach?
Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've designed a "front" handler that will send request to other handlers
> and return a aggregated response.
>
> Inside this handler, I call other handlers like this (inside the m
e:
>
> If you are doing this in a RequestHandler, implement SolrCoreAware and
> you will get a callback with the Core
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#head-8b3ac1fc3584fe1e822924b98af23d72b02ab134
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
&g
Hi,
I'm writing a custom handler that forwards a request to a handler of another
core. The custom handler is defined in "core0" and the core I try to send
the request to is "core2" which has a mlt handler. Here is the code of my
custom handler (extends RequestHandlerBase and implements SolrCoreAw
request.
To circumvent the problem, I implement a custom response writer. This is not
a problem for my project since I have to return a custom format.
Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a custom handler that forwards a request to a handler of
> another core. T
Hi,
I have that problem to. But I notice that it only happens if I send my data
via solrj. If I send it via the solr-ruby gem, everything is fine
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/solr-ruby).
Here is my jruby script:
---
require 'rubygems'
require 'solr'
require 'rexml/do
yes, now it works fine with the trunk sources
thanks!
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> SOLR-973 seems to have caused the problem
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>> do you know if your java file is encoded with utf-8?
>>
>> sometimes it will be encoded as somet
Hi,
I want to try KStem. I'm following the instructions on this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem
... but the download link doesn't work.
Is anyone know the new location to download KStem?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/KStem-downl
Hi,
I have encounter a situation that I can't explain. We are indexing documents
that are often duplicates so we activated deduplication like this:
true
true
signature
title,text
org.apache.solr.update.processor.Lookup3Signature
What I can't explain is that when
Are you sure that you don't have any java processes that are still running?
Did you change the port or are you still using 8983?
Lee Smith-6 wrote:
>
> Hey All
>
> Trying to dip my feet into multicore and hoping someone can advise why the
> example is not working.
>
> Basically I have been w
specific?
Thanks!
ANKITBHATNAGAR wrote:
>
> Try inspecting your index with luke
>
>
> Ankit
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal Dimassimo [mailto:thesuper...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:22 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hoss,
Thanks for your answers. You are absolutely right, I should have provided
you more details.
We index using 4 processes that read from a queue of documents. Each process
send one document at a time to the /update handler.
Yes, I double checked that no delete occur. Since that indexation,
Did you try the setting 'onlyMorePopular' ?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.onlyMorePopular
André Maldonado wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm configuring spell checking in my index. Everything is working, but I
> want to get the best suggestion based in number of ocurrence
By 'AutoSuggestion', are you referring to the spellcheck handler?
If so, you have to rebuild your spellcheck index using the 'build' parameter
after you add new data. You can also configure the spellcheck module to
rebuild the index automatically after a commit or an optimize.
http://wiki.apach
Hi,
hossman wrote:
>
> : We index using 4 processes that read from a queue of documents. Each
> process
> : send one document at a time to the /update handler.
>
> Hmmm.. then you should have a message from the LogUpdateProcessorFactory
> for every individual "add" command that was recieved ..
ng related to Solr.
>
> I haven't tried that. I'd have to get proficient in JSP :-)
As I wrote above, snoop.jsp does not work with Jetty either. I'll file a
bug on the jetty Debian package.
Cheers,
Jan-Pascal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
epository: http://www.vanbest.org/debian/
Thanks for any help,
Jan-Pascal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on't think it would be a fast-moving
target, so I could package it for Debian before the official release.
Is easymock.jar also a development version?
Thanks for your time!
Cheers
Jan-Pascal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
f some SecurityError. Now Tomcat uses the
symlinks to the .jar files in /usr/share/java.
Cheers
Jan-Pascal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
33 matches
Mail list logo