Hi, we are planning for a Solr Cloud upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.10. I have
identified the following steps for the upgrade
1. Update solrconfig.xml to be compliant with 4.10.
2. Update the required jar files and war files from Solr 4.10 distribution.
3. Verified we are using Java 1.7.
Now comes the q
Thanks Shawn, will try and it out without re-indexing and see how that goes.
Nitin
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/23/2014 8:40 AM, Nitin Agarwal wrote:
> > Hi, we are planning for a Solr Cloud upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.10. I have
> > identified the
Hi, I have a question around SOLR query, I am trying to restrict access to
SOLR data.
We are running SOLR 4.7.1, and wish to expose the query capabilities to our
customers for the data that belongs to them. Specifically "/select", with
default configuration is the only Request Handler that custome
as we add some limitations to each type of
> client, defining some constrains as how many documents. i.e. data points
> can be requested, etc.).
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> On Oct 7, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Nitin Agarwal <2nitinagar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I have a
Hi, I am using Solr 4.3.1 with 2 Shards and replication factor of 1,
running on apache tomcat 7.0.42 with external zookeeper 3.4.5.
When I query "select?q=*:*"
I only get the number of documents found, but no actual document. When I
query with rows=0, I do get correct count of documents in the in
er
> (fl=*,score is a good place to start).
>
> Jason
>
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Nitin Agarwal <2nitinagar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am using Solr 4.3.1 with 2 Shards and replication factor of 1,
> > running on apache tomcat 7.0.42 with external
ound). The internal Solr default is rows=10, but you can set it to
> 20, 50, 100, or whatever, but DO NOT set it to 0 unless you just want the
> header without any actual documents.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Nitin Agarwal
> Sent: Monday, July 29
Hoss, you rock!
That was the issue, I changed tn_lookup_key_id, which was my unique key
field, to string and reloaded the index and it works.
Jason, Jack and Hoss, thanks for your help.
Nitin
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Here is what my schema looks like
>
>
tock lowercase is KeywordTokenizerFactory+LowerCaseFilterFactory
> and if this leads to mis-matches as Hoss outlined, it'd surprise me so I
> need
> to file it away in my list of things not to do.
>
> Thanks,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Nitin Agarwal <2ni
