Hi,
I have a field f which is defined as follows.
Solr-5.2.1 is used. The index is spread across 12 shards (no replica) and
the index size on each node is around 100 GB.
When I search for 50 thousand values (ORed) in the field f it takes almost
around 45 to 55 seconds.
Per my understanding it i
f the index and probably additional CPU usage
> as well.
>
> How many rows are you returning on each query? Are you using all these
> terms just to filter a smaller query or to return a large bulk of
> documents?
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Mod
Last week our Solr Search was un-responsive and we need to re-boot the
server, but we were able to find out after customer complained about it.
What's best way to monitor that search is working?
May not be the best way but you can write a class which keeps on checking
the status of all the nodes o
Hi,
Kindly help me understand how will relevance ranking differ int following
searches.
query : fl:network
query : fl:networ*
What I am observing that the results returned are different in both of them
in a way that the top documents returned for q=fl:network is not present in
the top results of
Hi,
*q=fl1:net*&facet.field=fl&facet.limit=50&stats=true&stats.field={!cardinality=1.0}fl*
is returning cardinality around 15 million. It is taking around 4 minutes.
Similar response time is seen with different queries which yields high
cardinality. Kindly note that the cardinality=1.0 is the desi
met
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 4, 2016 12:22 PM, Modassar Ather <
> modather1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly help me understand how will relevance ranking differ int following
> searches.
>
> query : fl:network
> query : fl:networ*
>
> What I
.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Thanks for your response Ahmet.
>
> Best,
> Modassar
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Ahmet Arslan
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think wildcard queries fl:networ* are re-written i
ne.apache.org/core/5_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/MultiTermQuery.html#CONSTANT_SCORE_REWRITE
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/WildcardQuery.html
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> >
Hi,
An input will be helpful.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> *q=fl1:net*&facet.field=fl&facet.limit=50&stats=true&stats.field={!cardinality=1.0}fl*
> is returning cardinality around 15 million. It is tak
Hi Toke,
Is this a single shard or multiple?
It is 12 shard cluster without replicas and has around 90+ GB on each shard.
Thanks for sharing the link. I will look into that.
Regards,
Modassar
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:39 +0530, Modas
Hi,
I have following definition for WordDelimiterFilter.
The analysis of 3d shows following four tokens and their positions.
token position
3d 1
3 1
3d 1
d 2
Please help me understand why d is at 2? Should not it also be at position
think it should be at position 1? In that case searching for
> > "3 d" would not find anything. Is it what you expect?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Emir
> >
> > On 14.01.2016 10:15, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have f
at the same
> position. There was also some discussion about whether this was either a
> bug or a bug fix, but I don't recall any resolution.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
>
es where it is
> useful?
>
> Thanks,
> Emir
>
>
> On 15.01.2016 05:13, Modassar Ather wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your responses.
>>
>> It seems to me that you don't want to split on numbers.
>> It is not with number only. Even if you try to analyze WiFi
, Emir Arnautovic <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Can you please send us tokens you get (and positions) when you analyze
> *WiFi device*
>
> On 15.01.2016 13:15, Modassar Ather wrote:
>
>> Are you saying that WiFi Wi-Fi and Wi Fi should not match each other?
>&g
ining WiFi device will be
seen as a phrase with no word in between hence it should match phrase "WiFi
device" but it will not whereas "WiFi device"~1 will matched.
Best,
Modassar
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 1/18/2016 6:21 AM, Modassar Ather
Hi,
Got following error during optimize of index on 2 nodes of 12 node cluster.
Please let me know if the index can be recovered and how and what could be
the reason?
Total number of nodes: 12
No replica.
Solr version - 5.4.0
Java version - 1.7.0_91 (Open JDK 64 bit)
Ubuntu version : Ubuntu 14.04.
Hi,
Kindly provide your inputs on the issue.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Got following error during optimize of index on 2 nodes of 12 node
> cluster. Please let me know if the index can be recovered and how and what
> coul
And what does proximity search exactly mean?
A proximity search means searching terms with a distance in between them.
E.g. Search for a document which has java near 3 words of network.
field:"java network"~3
So the above query will match any document having a distance of 3 by its
position between
You can search them by escaping with backslash.
Best,
Modassar
; Thanks for quick response.
>
> Should these be treated differently during index ?
>
> I have tried *\"Audit* which is returning results of *Audit *also which is
> incorrect. what do you say ?
>
> On 12 February 2016 at 15:07, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > You
First it will search for "Eating Disorders" together and then the individual
words "Eating" and "Disorders"
I don't think the phrase will be searched as individual ANDed terms until
the query has it like below.
"Eating Disorders" OR (Eating AND Disorders).
Best,
Modassar
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at
Actually you can get it with the edismax.
Just set mm to 100% and then configure a pf field ( or more) .
You are going to search all the search terms mandatory and boost phrases
match .
@Alessandro Thanks for your insight.
I thought that the document will be boosted if all of the terms appear in
c
I debugged that recently.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 16 February 2016 at 11:42, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Actually you can get it with the edismax.
> > Just set mm to 100% and then configure a pf field ( or more) .
> > You are going to search all the search terms mandatory
Hi,
Kindly help me understand the parsing of following query. I am using
edismax parser and Solr-5.5.0.
q.op is set to AND and there is no explicit mm value set.
fl:(java OR book) => "boost(+((fl:java fl:book)~2),int(val))"
When the query has explicit OR then why the ~2 is present in the parsed
Hi,
A suggestion will be very helpful.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly help me understand the parsing of following query. I am using
> edismax parser and Solr-5.5.0.
> q.op is set to AND and there is no explicit mm va
Thanks Shawn for pointing to the jira issue. I was not sure that if it is
an expected behavior or a bug or there could have been a way to get the
desired result.
Best,
Modassar
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/9/2016 10:55 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> > The ~2 syntax, w
.)
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Shawn for pointing to the jira issue. I was not sure that if it is
> > an expected behavior or a bug or there could have been a way to get the
> > desired res
Hi,
Kindly help me understand the parsed queries of following three queries.
How these parsed queries can be interpreted for boolean logic.
Please ignore the boost part.
*Query : *fl:term1 OR fl:term2 AND fl:term3
*"parsedquery_toString" : *"boost(+(fl:term1 +fl:term2
+fl:term3),int(doc_wt))",
*m
is that it's present only in docs with term2 and term3 in them
> perhaps?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kindly help me understand the parsed queries of followin
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jack for your response.
> > The following jira bug for this issue is already present so I have not
> > created a new one.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812
> >
> > Kindly
to perform some function in a query with only two terms and and OR
> operator? I mean, why not just drop the q.op=AND?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Jack as suggested I have created following jira issue.
> >
&g
ieve following? "+((fl:java fl:book))"", which has an extra AND
> outside of the inner sub-query, which is a little different than just
> "(fl:java
> fl:book)". Sure, the results should be the same, but why insist on the
> extra level of nested boolean query?
>
> -
Hi,
Please help me understand following.
I have analysis chain which uses KStemFilterFactory for a field. Solr
version is 5.4.0
When I search for f:validator I get 80K+ documents whereas if I search for
f:validator* I get only around 150 results.
When I checked on analysis page I see that valid
er which stems "validator" to "validate" (if this stemming
> was applied at index time as well as query time) its looking for records
> that have "validate" or "validator", so for obvious reasons, numFound might
> have been different.
>
>
>
&g
; the same way at all, so searching for "validato*" wouldn't produce the
> expected response.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> > On 4/18/2016 1:18 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> >> When I search for f:va
Hi,
I have a field f which is defined as follows on solr 5.x. It is 12 shard
cluster with no replica.
When I facet on this field with different facet.limit I get different facet
count.
E.g.
Query : text_field:term&facet.field=f&facet.limit=100
Result :
1225
1082
1076
Query : text_field:term&f
Hi,
Kindly share your inputs on this issue.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a field f which is defined as follows on solr 5.x. It is 12 shard
> cluster with no replica.
>
> stored="false" indexed="fal
I tried to reproduce the same issue with a field of following type but
could not.
Please share your inputs.
Best,
Modassar
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly share your inputs on this issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Modassar
>
> On Mon
I'd be interested what you get if you restrict your
> queries to individual shards using &distrib=false. This
> will go to the individual shard you address and no others.
>
> Does the facet count change in those circumstances?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016
1 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 15:53 +0530, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > E.g.
> > Query : text_field:term&facet.field=f&facet.limit=100
> > Result :
> > 1225
> > 1082
> > 1076
> >
> > Query : text_field:term&facet.fie
Hi,
Kindly help me understand following with respect to Solr version 5.2.1.
1. What happens to the solr cluster if the standalone external zookeeper is
stopped/restarted with some changes done in zoo_data during the restart?
E.g After restarting the zookeeper the solr configs are reloaded wit
eadPool.java:555)\n\tat
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)\n","code":500}}
Regards,
Modassar
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/27/2015 6:17 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > Kindly help me understand following with respect to Solr version 5.2.1
ocess that's well established
> and tested for maintaining the Solr specific data?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your response Erick and Shawn.
> >
> > We had automated the solr/zookeeper futu
, after
restart the Solr nodes should come insync with the ZK state. Please correct
me if I am wrong.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/27/2015 10:21 PM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > Erick I am using the ZK upload process only. It is just that it is added
> >
Modassar
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/27/2015 10:59 PM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > If we upgrade zookeeper we need to restart. This upgrade process is
> > automated for future releases/changes of zookeeper.
> > This is a single external zookeep
I am using WordDelimiterFilter while indexing and searching both with the
following attributes. Parser used is edismax. Solr version is 5.2.1.
**
During search some of the results returned are not wanted. Following is the
example.
Search query: "3d image"
Search results with 3-d image/3 d image/
Hi,
Any suggestion will be really helpful. Kindly provide your inputs.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> I am using WordDelimiterFilter while indexing and searching both with the
> following attributes. Parser used is edismax. Solr version is
May be you can look at solr-jetty-context.xml present under server/context
folder of solr.
Regards,
Modassar
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:42 PM, saurabh tewari
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way through which one can change the name of solr webapp? I
> used to name my instances differently accordin
Hi,
Count of distinct values can be retrieved by following ways. Please note
that the Solr version is 5.2.1.
1. Using cardinality=true.
2. Using hll() facet function.
Kindly help me understand:
1. How accurate are them comparatively and better performance wise with
millions of documents?
2. Per
Please read docVlaues as docValues in my mail above.
Regards,
Modassar
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Count of distinct values can be retrieved by following ways. Please note
> that the Solr version is 5.2.1.
> 1. Using cardinality=true.
> 2.
ent ways the user can search for a term, so there's no need to
> actually modify the query to get a match).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Modassar Ather [mailto:modather1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 12:21 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject:
Hi,
I have a Solr cluster which hosts around 200 GB of index on each node and
are 6 nodes. Solr version is 5.2.1.
When a huge query is fired, it times out *(The request took too long to
iterate over terms.)*, which I can see in the log but at same time the one
of the Solr node goes down and the lo
e logs (e.g.
> OutOfMemoryError)?
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Solr cluster which hosts around 200 GB of index on each node and
> > are 6 nodes. Solr version is 5.2.1.
> > When a huge query is fired
that, I'd expect that to improve performance,
> not to cause JVM crashes.
>
> It might also help to know what version of Java you are running.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > The servers have 32g memory each. Solr JVM memory
n (ZK timeout), the
> JVM stops, the whole machine crashes?
>
> On 17 August 2015 at 14:17, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> > On 8/17/2015 5:45 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > > The servers have 32g memory each. Solr JVM memory is set to -Xms20g
> > > -Xmx24g. There are
collection.Please provide your inputs.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Shawn! The container I am using is jetty only and the JVM setting I am
> using is the default one which comes with Solr startup scripts. Yes I have
> changed the JVM memory setting as
Any suggestions please.
Regards,
Modassar
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting following exception for the query :
> *q=field:query&stats=true&stats.field={!cardinality=1.0}field*. The
> exception is not seen once the cardinalit
, migrating to Java
> 8 is on our "list of things to do", so our settings are probably not that
> relevant.
>
>
> On 18 August 2015 at 09:04, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 10:38 +0530, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > > Kindly help me understan
Ahmet/Chris! Thanks for your replies.
Ahmet I think "net.agkn.hll.serialization" is used by hll() function
implementation of Solr.
Chris I will try to create sample data and create a jira ticket with
details.
Regards,
Modassar
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : > I
You might want to look into the following documentation. These documents
have explanation on how to setup Zookeeper ensemble and Zookeeper
administration.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Setting+Up+an+External+ZooKeeper+Ensemble
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.6/zookeeperAdmi
I think you need to add the port number in solr.xml too under hostPort
attribute.
STOP.PORT is SOLR.PORT-1000 and set under /bin/solr file.
As far as I understand this can not be changed but I am not sure.
Regards,
Modassar
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Samy Ateia wrote:
> I changed the so
id not get the question but as much I understood and verified in the
Solr log the stat is computed on the field given with
stats.field={!cardinality=1.0}field.
Regards,
Modassar
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Ahmet/Chris! Thanks for your replies.
>
Hi Chris,
I have added a method in SOLR-7954 jira ticket to index sample data which
can be used to reproduce the issue.
Regards,
Modassar
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7954 for th
see if you can reproduce using
> the *exact* same data in two different fields, and if the choice of query
> makes a differnce in the behavior you see.
>
>
> :
> : Regards,
> : Modassar
> :
> : On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Modassar Ather >
> : wro
Hi,
Kindly help me understand the query time allowed attribute. The following
is set in solrconfig.xml.
30
Does this setting stop the query from running after the timeAllowed is
reached? If not is there a way to stop it as it will occupy resources in
background for no benefit.
Thanks,
Modass
Thanks for your response Jonathon.
Please correct me if I am wrong in following points.
-query actually ceases to run once time allowed is reached and releases
all the resources.
-query expansion is stopped and the query is terminated from execution
releasing all the resources.
Thanks,
Moda
Hi,
As per my understanding, to group on a field all documents with the same
value in the field have to be in the same shard.
Can we group by a field where the documents with the same value in that
field will be distributed across shards?
Please let me know what are the limitations, feature not a
t; group.ngroups and group.facet with just grouping?
>
> See the ref guide:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping#ResultGrouping-DistributedResultGroupingCaveats
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrot
Thanks Erick.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> That should be the case.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
> > Thanks Erick,
> >
> > I saw the link. So is it that the grouping func
Hi,
Search results are changed every time the following query is hit. Please
note that it is 7 shard cluster of Solr-5.2.1.
Query: q=network&start=50&rows=50&sort=f_sort asc&group=true&group.field=id
Following are the fields and their types in my schema.xml.
As per my understanding it see
an be identical
> in documents, it's always best to specify a secondary sort
> criteria. It's not referenced unless there's a tie so it's
> not that expensive. People often use whatever field
> is defined for since that's _guaranteed_ to
> never be the same
at 12:52 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Add fl=id,score,[shard] to your query, and show us the results of two
> differing executions.
>
> Perhaps we will be able to see the cause of the difference.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 05:35 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> &
from all shard
and then based on their score it should be sorted.
But here I see that every time I hit the sort query I am getting results
from different shard which has different scores.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Upayavira! I add the fl=id,sc
th the same score, the order would not be predictable -
> probably down to which shard responds first.
>
> Fix it with something like sort=score,timestamp or some other time
> related field.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > To
varies
> due to a zillion possible causes, network latency, a minor GC pause on one
> of the shards, whether all the caches are loaded, whatever. So subsequent
> calls will happen to get some _other_ shards docs in the list first.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> On Thu, Sep 10,
The information given is not sufficient to conclude a cause. You can check
the solr logs for details for any exception.
Regards,
Modassar
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Franky Parulian Silalahi <
fra...@telunjuk.com> wrote:
> I have problem with my solr and i run in centos 7.
> sometime my s
Hi,
I have a setup of 12 shard cluster started with 28gb memory each on a
single server. There are no replica. The size of index is around 90gb on
each shard. The Solr version is 5.2.1.
When I query "network se*", the memory utilization goes upto 24-26 gb and
the query takes around 3+ minutes to e
The rest is still a good for other system
activities.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 12:00 +0530, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > I have a setup of 12 shard cluster started with 28gb memory each on a
> > single server. Ther
Just to add one more point that one external Zookeeper instance is also
running on this particular machine.
Regards,
Modassar
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi Toke,
> Thanks for your response. My comments in-line.
>
> That is 12 machines, running a shar
his seems impossible if you are sure that only one query is played at a
> > time and no indexing is performed. Best thing to do is to dump stack
> trace
> > of the solr nodes during the query and to check what the threads are
> doing.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:25 +0530, Modassar Ather wrote:
> > The remaining size after you removed the heap usage should be reserved
> for
> > the index (not only the other system activities).
> > I am not able to get the above point. So when I start Solr with 28g RAM,
> &
gb RAM and 140 gb of
index on each node.
Regards,
Modassar
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Okay. I guess your observation of 400% for a single core is with top and
> looking at that core's entry? If so, the 400% can be explained by
> excessive garbage c
Normally tlog is replayed in case if solr server crashes for some reason
and when restarted it tries to recover from the crash gracefully.
You can look into following documentation which explains about transaction
logs and related stuff of Solr.
http://lucidworks.com/blog/2013/08/23/understanding-
your disk, if you have SSDs
> > it's better but reads are still significantly slower with SSDs than with
> > direct RAM access. Another thing to keep in mind is that mmap will always
> > tries to put things in RAM, this is why I suspect that you swap activity
> is
> >
od
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
>
> > On Nov 2, 2015, at 5:17 AM, Toke Eskildsen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 17:27 +0530, Modassar Ather wrote:
> >
> >> The query q=network se* is quick enough
for replying ,
>
> could u please elaborate ..what wuld have happened when we were getting
> this kind of warning ds
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek Tiwari
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Normally tlog is replayed in case if solr server crashes
What is your index size? How much memory is used? What type of queries are
slow?
Are there GC pauses as they can be a cause of slowness?
Are document updates/additions happening in parallel?
The queries are very slow to run so I was thinking to distribute
the indexes into multiple indexes and cons
g/solr/DistributedSearch. What I was looking
> for how this is handled in Solr Cloud?
>
>
> Regards,
> Salman
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > What is your index size? How much memory is used? What type of queries
>
t;
> How many segments are there in the index? The more the segment the slower
> is
> the search.
> How do I check how many segments are there in the index?
>
> Is this after you moved to solrcloud?
> I have been using SolrCloud from the beginning.
>
> Regards,
> Salman
Hi,
I have following docValues enabled field.
*Field : *
*Type: *
When I am grouping on this field I am getting following exception. Kindly
let me know if I am missing something or it is an issue.
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException; java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.
Hi,
Any input will be really helpful.
Regards,
Modassar
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have following docValues enabled field.
>
> *Field : *
> *Type: * sortMissingLast="true" stored="false" indexed="false" d
mention the version of Solr.
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 8 November 2015 at 22:59, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any input will be
uch as performance?
>
> Which version of solr are you using?
> Currently, I am using Solr 5.3. btw, I could not find segment info link. Is
> it under Core Admin?
>
> Regards,
> Salman
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks fo
Hi,
I have a query title:(solr lucene api). The mm is set to 100% using q.op as
AND.
When the query is executed it returns documnets having all the terms. It
parses to following:
+(title:solr title:faceting title:api)~3
Similarlly I have another query like this topic:facet AND title:(solr
lucene
:14 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Thanks for your response.
>
> Upayavira : The missing bracket is a copy paste error. Correct parsed
> query : +(+topic:facet +(title:solr title:lucene title:api)). Use of fq is
> not an option as these are user queries.
> Alexandre : That is jus
Hi,
Kindly help me understand the behavior of following field.
For a field like above where indexed="true" and docValues="true", is it
that:
1) For sorting/faceting on *manu_exact* the docValues will be used.
2) For querying on *manu_exact* the inverted index will be used.
Thanks,
Modassar
Thanks for your response Mikhail.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> Both statements seem true to me.
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Modassar Ather
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kindly help me und
loading of the field from
> disk, essentially
> putting the uninverted field value in a conveniently-loadable form.
>
> So AFAIK, the field is stored only once and used for all three,
> sorting, faceting and
> searching.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4
r not.
> So if you want a "rule of thumb", make it a docValues field
> if you're updating your index rapidly. Otherwise whether a field is
> docValues or not is largely irrelevant.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Modassar Ather
> wrot
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
