;end'=>'2012-01-11T09:44:22Z'}}
,'facet_ranges'=>{}}}
As you can see for the same ranges I'm getting different counts. The CORRECT
one is the facet_dates ones.
BTW I'm using Solr Implementation Version: 3.5.0 1204988 - simon - 2011-11-22
14:54:38
Is this a KNOW BUG? Please Help! :D
--
Mauro Asprea
E-Mail: mauroasp...@gmail.com
Mobile: +34 654297582
Skype: mauro.asprea
I think I solve it... It seems to be because of the - that's just before the
query facet name
--
Mauro Asprea
E-Mail: mauroasp...@gmail.com
Mobile: +34 654297582
Skype: mauro.asprea
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Mauro Asprea wrote:
> Hi, I;m having issues using
TO
2012\-01\-16T08\:59\:59Z]&facet.query={!ex=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-11T06\:47\:38Z
TO
2012\-01\-18T12\:47\:38Z]&facet.query={!ex=cg01w4p3bcj3}date_start_dt:[2012\-01\-11T06\:47\:38Z
TO 2012\-02\-10T12\:47\:38Z]
Using the last Solr release 3.5
Thanks!
--
Mauro Asprea
E-Mail: mauroasp...@gmail.com
Mobile: +34 654297582
Skype: mauro.asprea
t_i desc. The issue here is that when does
the grouping it is seems to be failingl to sort the groups by the second key.
to clarify: I do understand the use case for the other "group.sort" key and it
is working just fine. The issue is with the 2nd regular sort key.
Thanks ;)
I would want to know about this too
—
Mauro Asprea
E-Mail: mauroasp...@gmail.com
Mobile: +34 654 297 582
> El 14 jul 2020, a las 18:33, André Widhani escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know if work is in progress to make Lucene's concurrent query
> execution access
> > >>> Hope you are healthy and safe.
> > >>>
> > >>> Need some help with HDFS configuration.
> > >>>
> > >>> Could anybody of you share an example of the configuration with which
> > you
> > >>> are running Sol
