Re: OOM on sorting on dynamic fields

2010-06-18 Thread Matteo Fiandesio
Hello, we are experiencing OOM exceptions in our single core solr instance (on a (huge) amazon EC2 machine). We investigated a lot in the mailing list and through jmap/jhat dump analyzing and the problem resides in the lucene FieldCache that fills the heap and blows up the server. Our index is qui

Re: OOM on sorting on dynamic fields

2010-06-21 Thread Matteo Fiandesio
lso facet values for a field) should be > controlled by a fixed-size cache, but they are not. > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Matteo Fiandesio > wrote: >> Hello, >> we are experiencing OOM exceptions in our single core solr instance >> (on a (huge) amazon EC2

Re: OOM on sorting on dynamic fields

2010-06-22 Thread Matteo Fiandesio
larger EC2 instances. > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Matteo Fiandesio > wrote: >> Compiling solr with lucene 2.9.3 instead of 2.9.1 will solve this issue? >> Regards, >> Matteo >> >> On 19 June 2010 02:28, Lance Norskog wrote: >>> The Lucene

Re: OOM on sorting on dynamic fields

2010-06-22 Thread Matteo Fiandesio
your index frequently and re-opening readers often? > If so, how? > > I'm assuming that if you do NOT sort on all these fields, you don't have > the problem, is that true? > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Matteo Fiandesio < > matteo.fi

Re: OOM on sorting on dynamic fields

2010-06-22 Thread Matteo Fiandesio
tely by firing off enough sort queries at the server. It'll > tell you a lot if you can't make this happen, even on a relatively small > test machine. > > Best > Erick > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Matteo Fiandesio < > matteo.fiande...@gmail.com> wrote

Re: OOM on sorting on dynamic fields

2010-06-23 Thread Matteo Fiandesio
gards, Matteo On 22 June 2010 22:41, Matteo Fiandesio wrote: > Fields over i'm sorting to are dynamic so one query sorts on > erick_time_1,erick_timeA_1 and other sorts on erick_time_2 and so > on.What we see in the heap are a lot of arrays,most of them,filled > with 0s maybe due