releases. It is possible that the mirror you
are using may not have replicated the release yet. If that is the
case, please try another mirror. This also goes for Maven access.
Happy Holidays,
Mark Miller
http://www.about.me/markrmiller
all of the issues
are not known or documented and that updates may introduce new issues. You
face some risk like that no matter what though.
- Mark
On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 8:37:47 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 1/1/2015 6:35 PM, William Bell wrote:
> > But tons of people on this mailing li
bq. ClusterState says we are the leader, but locally we don't think so
Generally this is due to some bug. One bug that can lead to it was recently
fixed in 4.10.3 I think. What version are you on?
- Mark
On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 7:35:47 AM Thomas Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found no
I'd have to do some digging. Hossman might know offhand. You might just
want to use @SupressSSL on the tests :)
- Mark
On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 8:45:11 AM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi - in a small Maven project depending on Solr 4.10.3, running unit tests
> that extend BaseDistributedSea
bq. Is this the correct approach ?
It works, but it might not be ideal. Recent versions of ZooKeeper have an
alternate config for this max limit though, and it is preferable to use
that.
See maxSessionTimeout in
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.1/zookeeperAdmin.html
- Mark
On Mon Jan 26
Sorry, there is no great workaroud. You might try raising the max idle time
for your container - perhaps that makes it less frequent.
- Mark
On Tue Jan 20 2015 at 1:56:54 PM Nishanth S wrote:
> Thank you Mike.Sure enough,we are running into the same issue you
> mentoined.Is there a qui
Yes, after 45 seconds a replica should take over as leader. It should
likely explain in the logs of the replica that should be taking over why
this is not happening.
- Mar
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 2:52:32 PM Joshi, Shital wrote:
> When leader reaches 99% physical memory on the box and starts swapp
by the
way.
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a SolrCloud (Solr 4.4, writing to HDFS on CDH-5.3) collection
> configured to be populated by flume Morphlines sink. The flume agent reads
> data from Kafka a
Odd - looks like it's stuck waiting to be notified that a new searcher is ready.
- Mark
On Jun 27, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Neal Ensor wrote:
> Okay, I have done this (updated to 4.3.1 across master and four slaves; one
> of these is my own PC for experiments, it is not being accessed
t;>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > class="org.apache.solr.update.TopicQuestsDocumentProcessFactory">
>>hello
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > class="solr.DirectUpdateHandler2">
>>
>>
hen I
removed copies of my jar from other lib directories which I had been
experimenting with.
--
Mark Bennett / LucidWorks: Search & Big Data / mark.benn...@lucidworks.com
Office: 408-898-4201 / Telecommute: 408-733-0387 / Cell: 408-829-6513
On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Jack Park wrote:
>
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Distributed_Requests
- Mark
On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This "search across multiple collections" question has come up a few
> times recently:
>
> http://search-lucene.com/m/2Q1BE0IT4Y/
There were a variety of little bugs - it will just be a bit of a land mine
situation if you try and do it with 4.3.1.
If it ends up working for you, that's that.
- Mark
On Jun 27, 2013, at 3:22 PM, shikhar wrote:
> Can anyone (Eric?) outline what's changing between 4.3.1 and 4
You might be seeing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4923 ?
The commit true part of the request that add documents? If so, it might be
SOLR-4923 and you should try the commit in a request after adding the docs.
- Mark
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:42 PM, "Joshi, Shital" wr
Yeah, that is what I would try until 4.4 comes out - and it should not matter
replica or leader.
- Mark
On Jun 28, 2013, at 3:13 PM, "Joshi, Shital" wrote:
> Thanks Mark.
>
> We use commit=true as part of the request to add documents. Something like
> this:
>
>
On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:56 AM, Phil Hoy wrote:
> Perhaps an http header could be added or another attribute added to the solr
> result node.
I thought that was already done - I'm surprised that it's not. If that's really
the case, please make a JIRA issue.
- Mark
No, SolrCloud does not currently use ssh.
- Mark
On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:58 PM, adfel70 wrote:
> Hi
> Does solr cloud on a cluster of servers require passwordless ssh to be
> configured between the servers?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http
Please file a JIRA issue so that we can address this.
- Mark
On Jul 2, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Daniel Collins wrote:
> On looking at the code in SolrDispatchFilter, is this intentional or not?
> I think I remember Mark Miller mentioning that in an OOM case, the best
> course of action is
een using the trick forever with Lucene.
- Mark
It's a known bug, fix coming in 4.4, 4.4 likely coming within a couple weeks.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4805
- Mark
On Jul 8, 2013, at 10:30 AM, adfel70 wrote:
> Hi
>
> each time I reload a collection via collections API, zookeeper thinks that
> all
le to implement this pattern with a
single collection as the custom sharding features advance.
- Mark
On Jul 6, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Not saying it's always one way or the other, just
> that one shouldn't automatically _assume_
> putting the most recent data o
> CloudSolrServer server = new CloudSolrServer("?");
>
> right away?
>
> Or will point to one instance using HttpSolrServer suffice for now?
Yes, it will.
- Mark
>
> Thanks.
It's simply a sugar method that no one has gotten to yet. I almost have once or
twice, but I always have moved onto other things before even starting.
It's fairly simple to just start another replica on the TO node and then delete
the replica on the FROM node, so not a lot of urgenc
Something is wrong if it actually takes 20 minutes.
- Mark
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Ranjith Venkatesan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to solr. Currently i m using Solr-4.3.0. I had setup a solrcloud
> setup in 3 machines. If I kill a node running in any of the machine using
If you call /solr/zookeeper on a specific node, that servlet would tell you -
output is a bit verbose for what you want though.
- Mark
On Jul 9, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Robert Stewart wrote:
> I would like to be able to do it without consulting Zookeeper. Is there some
> variable or API
Yeah, though CREATE and UNLOAD end up being kind of funny descriptors.
You'd think LOAD and UNLOAD or CREATE and DELETE or something...
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mark. I assume you are referring to using the
On Jul 10, 2013, at 4:39 AM, Daniel Collins wrote:
> QueryNorm is what I'm still trying to get to the bottom of exactly :)
If you have not seen it, some reading from the past here…
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896
- Mark
start using the
Collections API - preconfigured collections will be second class and possibly
deprecated at some point.
- Mark
On Jul 20, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Flavio:
>
> One of the great things about having people continually using Solr
> (and SolrCloud) for
There is a reason of course, or else it wouldn't be like that.
We addressed it recently.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3633
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3677
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4943
- Mark
On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Michael Della
with those settings.
- Mark
On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Radu Ghita wrote:
> Forgot to attach server and solr configurations:
>
> SolrCloud 4.1, internal Zookeeper, 16 shards, custom java importer.
> Server: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, 32 cores, 192gb RAM, 10tb
>
Hi Artem,
I noticed this recently too. I created a JIRA issue here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5040
Cheers,
Mark
Artem Karpenko writes:
> Hi,
>
> when making a backup snapshot using "/replication?command=backup"
> call, a snapshot directory is cr
SOLR-4816 won't address this - it will just speed up *different* parts. There
are other things that will need to be done to speed up that part.
- Mark
On Jul 26, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> This is current a hard-coded limit from what I've understood. From what
l free to create a JIRA issue - I'll try and get to it otherwise.
- Mark
Yes, the internal document forwarding path is different and does not use the
CloudSolrServer. It currently works with a buffer of 10.
- Mark
On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Why wouldn't it? Or are you saying that the routing to replicas
> from the leader als
I don't seem to be seeing a signifigant slowdown over time when I use the old
defaults for merge threads and max merges.
- Mark
On Jul 25, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I'm looking into some possible slow down after long indexing issues when I
> get back from vaca
like we want to get to the bottom of why you randomly don't see the
documents in the response.
- Mark
cluster to work if possible (via proxing the request or whatever).
- Mark
On Aug 6, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Greg Walters wrote:
> -Dsolr.hdfs.confdir=/etc/hadoop/conf.cloudera.hdfs1
Have you set that up in the directoryFactory section of solrconfig.xml? Make
sure you have something like:
${solr.hdfs.home:}
${solr.hdfs.confdir:}
- Mark
What does the cluster state and leader say?
Anything interesting you can pull from the logs?
- Mark
On Aug 14, 2013, at 4:58 AM, Tor Egil wrote:
> Setup:
> 3 zk servers
> 3 solr 4.4 servers (1 shard with 2 replicas)
>
> Every now and then Solr gets trapped recovering
>
&
replicas.
If one had no tlog, it should have recovered from the one that still had a tlog.
>
> How does the zookeeper compare the 2 tlogs to know which one is more
> recent? does it not rely on the version number shown in the admin UI?
It looks at recent id's in the tlogs of both an
tened to make a JIRA issue about
throwing an exception on this and one or two other core admin commands. We
might want to support them in some way at some point, but currently, swap is
def no good in SolrCloud.
- Mark
ction alias instead.
- Mark
On Aug 17, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I think this is only a "test dependency" ?
Right - it's only for the hdfs 'test' setup. I thought that when Steve moved it
from the test module to the core, he handled it so that it would not go out in
the dist.
- mark
On Aug 27, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Sandro Zbinden wrote:
> Can we activate the transaction log to have on disk guarantees and then use
> the solr soft commit feature ?
Yes you can. If you only have a single node (no replication), you probably want
to turn on fsync via the config.
- Mark
es to Sandro inline below:
On Aug 27, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Sandro Zbinden wrote:
> Hey Mark
>
> Thank you very much for the quick answer. We have a single node environment.
>
> I try to find the fsync option but was not successful. Ended up in the
> UpdateLog class :-)
>
m and is confusing.
- Mark
On Aug 29, 2013, at 5:23 AM, sathish_ix wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Check your configuration files uploaded into zookeeper is valid and no error
> in config files uploaded.
> I think due to this error, solr core will not be created.
>
> Thanks,
> Sath
s, then it replicates the index, buffering all updates during that
replication, then it replays all those updates from the buffer. No 'target'
number of updates applies here.
- Mark
I'm going to try and fix the root cause for 4.5 - I've suspected what it is
since early this year, but it's never personally been an issue, so it's rolled
along for a long time.
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
> Hey guys,
Ill look at fixing the root issue for 4.5. I've been putting it off for way to
long.
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> I was having problems updating SolrCloud with a large batch of records. The
> records are coming in bursts with lu
There is an issue if I remember right, but I can't find it right now.
If anyone that has the problem could try this patch, that would be very
helpful: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=aaRWwSGP
- Mark
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Got an
It would be great if you could give this patch a try:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=aaRWwSGP
- Mark
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> Thanks. If there is anything I can do to help you resolve this issue, let
> me know.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4,
I don't know that there is any 'safe' thing you can do other than restart -
but if I were to try anything, I would use true for rollback.
- Mark
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> I have an application where I am calling DirectUpdateHandle
ore like a workaround than a fix.
The patch uses a separate 'limiting' semaphore for the two cases.
- Mark
On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
> Thanks guys! :)
>
> Mark: this patch is much appreciated, I will try to test this shortly,
> hopefu
up, you want to stop indexing and commit first. But if you
just want a rough snapshot for around that time, in both cases you can still
just don't hard commit and take a snapshot.
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2013, at 1:13 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> The replication handle
Phone typing. The end should not say "don't hard commit" - it should say "do a
hard commit and take a snapshot".
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I don't know that it's too bad though - its always been the
thing interesting change with the rest of the system? CPU usage
spikes or something like that?
Clamping down further on the overall number of threads night help (which would
require making something configurable). How many nodes are listed in zk under
live_nodes?
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On
Okay, thanks, useful info. Getting on a plane, but ill look more at this soon.
That 10k thread spike is good to know - that's no good and could easily be part
of the problem. We want to keep that from happening.
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Tim Vaillancourt
Right, I don't see SOLR-5232 making 4.5 unfortunately. It could perhaps make a
4.5.1 - it does resolve a critical issue - but 4.5 is in motion and SOLR-5232
is not quite ready - we need some testing.
- Mark
On Sep 12, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> My take on it is this,
is coming in 4.5, which is a probably a week or so away.
>
> Eventually (after few minutes), leader takes over, mark collections "active"
> but remains blocked on http interface, so other nodes can not synchronize.
>
> In further tests, we loaded 4 collections with numShards=
SOLR-5243 and SOLR-5240 will likely improve the situation. Both fixes are in
4.5 - the first RC for 4.5 will likely come tomorrow.
Thanks to yonik for sussing these out.
- Mark
On Sep 17, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Vladimir Veljkovic
&g
I'm new to spatial search within solr. If I have a set of records containing
closed polylines describing, say, the boundaries of nations, can I use solr to
build an index of these records against which I can search to see if a point is
contained within any of them?
Thanks,
-Mark
The attachment did not go through - try using pastebin.com or something.
Are you adding docs with curl one at a time or in bulk per request.
- Mark
On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Saurabh Saxena wrote:
> Repeated the experiments on local system. Single shard Solrcloud with a
> replica. Tr
update as well,
so I guess I figured why add it explicitly. I figured we could still do it
later - and I suppose we probably should.
I also intend to add a list alias command:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4968
- Mark
On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Michael Della Bitta
wrote
Set the collection param per request. It only uses the default if you don't set
it.
- Mark
On Oct 11, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Mark wrote:
> If using one static SolrCloudServer how can I add a bean to a certain
> collection. Do I need to update setDefaultCollection() each time? I do
Hmm, I'd have to look, but first to make, this subject says 4.1?
In 4.1 the slave will be ahead because it commits after installing the index.
In 4.2 it shouldn't.
Your on?
- Mark
On Mar 20, 2013, at 4:03 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Thanks for the info.
> I understand
faceting method that may have some better nrt characteristics than fcs. I have
not played with it yet but hope to soon.
- Mark
out to go out, if we are quick, perhaps we can address something
here if there is a problem.
- Mark
> Thanks,
> Rohit
Can you give more details about your configuration and setup?
Our best bet is to try and recreate this with a unit test.
- Mark
On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Uomesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing an issue after upgrading from solr 3.6.2 to Solr 4.2. My Slave
> stop replicating af
Can you elaborate on what you are looking for? If you mean automatically moving
shards around, it's not anything I intend to work on currently. Not sure about
others. I do plan on on working on an http command for moving shards though.
- Mark
On Mar 21, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Jamie Johnson
Hmm…I guess I'll work on beefing up these tests some more tonight and see if I
can stumble across it.
- Mark
On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Uomesh wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Attached is my solrconfig_slave.xml. My replication interval is 1
> minute(default).
>
> Please let
Could you attach the master as well?
- Mark
On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Uomesh wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Attached is my solrconfig_slave.xml. My replication interval is 1
> minute(default).
>
> Please let me know if you need any more config details
>
> Thanks,
> umes
compared.
Is there anything else you are putting into this mix?
- Mark
On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Uomesh wrote:
> Thank you!!,
>
> Attached is my master solrconfig.xml. I have few custom handlers which you
> might need to remove. In custom handler i have not much code just adding
&
You might try using docvalues with the on disk option and try and let the OS
manage all the memory needed for all the faceting/sorting. This would require
Solr 4.2.
- Mark
On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:56 AM, kobe.free.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Scenario:
>
> My data m
I'm working on testing to try and catch what you are seeing here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4629
- Mark
On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Let me know if there is anything else you can add.
>
> A test with your setup that index n docs ran
The other odd thing here is that this should not stop replication at all. When
the slave is ahead, it will still have it's index replaced.
- Mark
On Mar 22, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I'm working on testing to try and catch what you are seeing here:
> https://i
There are a few things going on here that caused this, all resolved in 4.2 as
far as I know.
- Mark
On Mar 22, 2013, at 3:56 AM, bradhill99 wrote:
> Hi,
> I use solrcloud 4.1.
> I start up two solr nodes A and B and then created a new collection using
> CoreAdmin to A using o
Are you replicating configuration files as well?
- Mark
On Mar 22, 2013, at 6:38 AM, "John, Phil (CSS)" wrote:
> To add to the discussion.
>
> We're running classic master/slave replication (not solrcloud) with 1 master
> and 2 slaves and I noticed the slave hav
And your also on 4.2?
- Mark
On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Uomesh wrote:
> Also, I am replicating only on commit and startup.
>
> Thanks,
> Umesh
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Umesh Sharma wrote:
>
>> Hi Mrk,
>>
>> I am replicating
n't happen when configs don't replicate). I'll
see what I can do to try and get a test to catch it.
- mark
On Mar 22, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> And your also on 4.2?
>
> - Mark
>
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Uomesh wrote:
>
>> Also, I am
On Mar 22, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Gary Yngve wrote:
> Thanks, Mark!
>
> The core node names in the solr.xml in solr4.2 is great! Maybe in 4.3 it
> can be supported via API?
It is with the core admin api - do you mean the collections api? Please make a
JIRA for any feature requests s
- if you have compiled a lot of evidence (sorry i have not had
time to follow up on this myself), please create a jira issue for more
prominence.
- Mark
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Did-something-change-with-Payloads-tp4049561p4050599.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I don't know the ValueSourceParser from a hole in my head, but it looks like it
has access to the solrcore with fp.req.getCore?
If so, it's easy to get the zk stuff
core.getCoreDescriptor.getCoreContainer.getZkController(.getZkClient).
From memory, so perhaps with some minor misnam
I'm guessing you didn't specify numShards. Things changed in 4.1 - if you don't
specify numShards it goes into a mode where it's up to you to distribute
updates.
- Mark
On Mar 25, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Chris R wrote:
> I have two issues and I'm unsure if they are r
Are you using SolrCloud mode?
- Mark
On Mar 26, 2013, at 4:49 AM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
> Hi I am having a multi core setup with 2 core "core0" and core1".
> How do i insert doc in core 1?
>
> I am using as below.
>
> searchServer =
That's pretty interesting. The slave should have no way of doing this without a
commit…
- Mark
On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Uomesh wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Further details: My master details has not changed since last 24 hours but
> Slave index version and Gen has increased.
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
There must be something off with the jars you are using - a mix of versions or
something.
- Mark
On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I use Solr 4.2 on Centos 6.4 at AWS and I have deployed solr wars into two
> different amazon instan
Use merge
policy settings to control the segment count.
>
> Is it correct that currently the only option for now the make more shards to
> reduce the disc space?
??
>
> Is the any progress in the resharding option the developers are working on?
Yes, see the JIRA issue on sh
They are load-balanced across the cluster unless you pass the distrib=false
param.
- Mark
On Mar 27, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> I am running Solr 4.1. I have set up SolrCloud with 1 leader and 3
> replicas, 4 nodes total. Do query requests send to a node only query the
> r
On Mar 27, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> The maxThreads parameter in the jetty config that's included with Solr is set
> to 1
Yonik raised this at some point if I remember right - it helps avoid some
distrib deadlock issue.
- Mark
Yup. You only want to warm locally. We should add that to the wiki.
- Mark
On Mar 27, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> When running in SolrCloud mode, does it make sense to disable distributed
> mode for warming queries? i.e. distrib=false in my warming query config
>
>
Ah, interesting. Forgot about doing that issue entirely.
- Mark
On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> I ran a quick test and distrib=false is being tacked on automatically. Here
> is the log record:
>
> INFO: [collection1] webapp=null path=null
> params={sort=
do like:
> java -classpath "example/solr-webapp/WEB-INF/lib/*"
> org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkCLI -cmd upconfig -zkhost 127.0.0.1:9983
> -confdir example/solr/collection1/conf -confname conf1
I think the examples on the wiki should probably be updated. -solrhome is only
needed with the
ollowing rules
apply for this:
1. If there is only one config set, when you start a new collection without an
explicit link, it will link to it.
2. If a collection does not have an explicit link, but shares the name of a
config set, it will link to it.
3. You can set an explicit link.
Also, you
e back to
>> the
>>> Wiki example. After setting up the two shard example in the first
>> tutorial
>>> and indexing the three example documents, look at the shards in the Admin
>>> UI. The documents are stored in the index where the update with
>> directe
Currently, yes. Stop each web container in the normal fashion. That will do a
clean shutdown.
- Mark
On Mar 28, 2013, at 5:48 PM, "Li, Qiang" wrote:
> How to shut down the SolrCloud? Just kill all nodes?
>
> Regards,
> Ivan
>
> This email message and any attachm
7;s like a 20 beer event…
- Mark
hy I say the collections API is the way forward - it has none of
these limitations. The limitations are all around pre-configuring everything in
solr.xml and not using the collections API.
- Mark
gt; those files do get deleted or renamed.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
Currently, it's a straight upload - if files went away locally, they will stay
in zk. It will just replace what you upload. Happy to help implement a sync
option or something if you create a JIRA for it.
- mark
But this is fixed in 4.2 - now the index writer is rebooted on core reload.
So that's just 4.0 and 4.1.
- Mark
On Mar 28, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : But solr wiki says:
> : ```
> : Starting with Solr4.0, the RELOAD command is implemented in a way that
&g
Though I think *another* JIRA made data dir not changeable over core reload for
some reason I don't recall exactly. But the other stuff is back to being
changeable :)
- Mark
On Mar 28, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> But this is fixed in 4.2 - now the index writer is rebooted
501 - 600 of 2249 matches
Mail list logo
