I just came across a wonderful online reference wiki for SOLR and thought of
sharing it with the community..
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Apache+Solr+Reference+Guide
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-online-reference-document-WIKI-tp40
Check the list here..
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Name-of-the-couple-of-popular-app-web-sites-using-solar-as-search-engine-tp4073157p4073160.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Check this link..
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-HTTP-caching-td490063.html
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Varnish-tp4072057p4073205.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I currently have a SOLRJ program which I am using for indexing the data in
SOLR. I am trying to figure out a way to build index without depending on
running instance of SOLR. I should be able to supply the solrconfig and
schema.xml to the indexing program which in turn create index files that I
can
I was using ConcurrentUpdateSOLR for indexing documents to Solr. Later I had
a need to do portable indexing hence started using Embedded solr server.
I created a multithreaded program to create /submit the documents in batch
of 100 to Embedded SOLR server (running inside Solrj indexing process) bu
Shawn,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I have pasted my entire code below, it would be great if you can let me know
if I am doing anything wrong in terms of running the code in multithreaded
environment.
http://pastebin.com/WRLn3yWn
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabbl
Might not be useful but a work around would be to divide all scores by max
score to get scores between 0 and 1.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Normalizing-Returning-solr-scores-between-0-to-1-tp4073797p4073829.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list arch
Thanks a lot for your response. I created a multithreaded program to create
/submit the documents in batch of 100 to Embedded SOLR server but for some
reason it takes more time to index the data when compared with
ConcurrentUpdateeSOLR server. I was under assumption that embedded server
would take
Hi,
I currently have a query as below. I am using the fq only if latlong value
(using switch plugin) is not empty else I am not using fq at all.
Whenever latlong value is empty, I just use value of $where (in "q")
parameter to return the results based on location.
Now whenever latlong value is a
I am trying to combine geospatial query (latlong) with the below query inside
a search component but I am getting the below error..
*Error:*
missing sfield for spatial request
400
(
_query_:"{!wp_optional df='addr_location_clean_i' qs=1
v=$fps_where}"^6.2 OR
_query_:"{!w
I am using the switch parser plugin as below. Whenever there is a value for
$latlong it will invoke $fq_bbox or else it will invoke $fq_simple.. Now I
need to add one more case whenever $where is not present in the query I need
to do call fq_all and ignore both fq_bbox / fq_simple. Can someone let
I wrote a custom data import handler to import data from files. I am trying
to figure out a way to make asynchronous call instead of waiting for the
data import response. Is there an easy way to invoke asynchronously (other
than using futures and callables) ?
public class CustomFileImportHandler
I am trying to suppress the error messages received when a value is not
passed to a query,
Ex:
/select?first_name=peter&fq=$first_name&q=*:*
I don't want the above query to throw error or die whenever the variable
first_name is not passed to the query hence I came up with a plugin to
return nul
I am trying to make a variable in fq optional,
Ex:
/select?first_name=peter&fq=$first_name&q=*:*
I don't want the above query to throw error or die whenever the variable
first_name is not passed to the query instead return the value corresponding
to rest of the query. I can use switch but its
I am trying to make a variable in fq optional,
Ex:
/select?first_name=peter&fq=$first_name&q=*:*
I don't want the above query to throw error or die whenever the variable
first_name is not passed to the query instead return the value corresponding
to rest of the query. I can use switch but its
I am trying to make a variable in fq optional,
Ex:
/select?first_name=peter&fq=$first_name&q=*:*
I don't want the above query to throw error or die whenever the variable
first_name is not passed to the query instead return the value corresponding
to rest of the query. I can use switch but its
I was able to form a TermQuery as below,
Query query=new TermQuery(new Term("id","value"));
I am trying to form a filter query something that returns just the filter
that can be used with any query type (q or fq).
if (qstr == null || qstr.trim().length() < 1) {
I am using ConcurrentUpdateSolrserver to create 4 threads (threadCount=4)
with queueSize of 3.
Indexing works fine as expected.
My issue is that, I see that the documents are getting adding to server even
before it reaches the queue size. Am I doing anything wrong? Or is
queuesize not implem
You can use keyword tokenizer..
Creates org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.KeywordTokenizer.
Treats the entire field as a single token, regardless of its content.
Example: "http://example.com/I-am+example?Text=-Hello"; ==>
"http://example.com/I-am+example?Text=-Hello";
--
View this message in co
We have SOLR master, primarily for indexing and SOLR slave primarily for
searching. I see that the merge factor plays a key factor in Indexing as
well as searching. I would like to have a high merge factor for my master
instance and low merge factor for slave.
As of now since I just replicate the
Hi,
I am currently using the below configuration in one of my handler and I was
thinking of removing the values from q parameter and including as a part of
fq parameter.
Can someone let me know if there is any performance improvement when using
fq parameter compared to q?
(
Hi,
Sorry if its a very basic question but I am pretty new to SolrCloud and I am
trying to understand the underlying mechanism for calculating relevancy.
Currently we are using SOLR 3.6.X and we use shards to perform distributed
searching. Our shards are not of equal size hence sometimes the resu
Thanks for your response.
So in case of SolrCloud, SOLR/zookeeper takes care of managing the indexing
/ searching. So in that case I assume most of the shards will be of equal
size (I am just going to push the data to a leader). I assume IDF wont be a
big issue then since the shards size are almo
I have a very simple question. Does restarting SOLR removes all caches
(including disk caches if any?).
I have disabled all caches in solrconfig.xml but even then I see that there
is some caching happening all the time.
I am currently doing some performance testing and I dont want cache to play
a
Hi,
I am adding around 100 million records to SOLR using SOLRJ. I am not
performing commit operation until I add all the documents to SOLR. I see
that my program adds the docs very fast (1 million per minute) for around 18
million documents which is expected result but after 18 million records
ind
25 matches
Mail list logo