Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> Compound was a *lot* slower indexing in past versions of Lucene...
>
I've noticed the difference with Lucene 2.4.1 and Solr 1.3 of ~40% speed
improvement on a RHEL 5.1 system while processing a fresh index of ~500,000
files by turning of the compound file.
However, if
I am trying to figure out how to configure Solr. I have worked with the
example and have been reading over the wiki, and am having some difficulty
figuring out how I would setup this simple scenario:
index a large number of text files(they aren't the csv files solr can ingest
directly) that are n
This functionality is possible 'out of the box', right? Or am I going to need
to code up something that reads in the id named files and generates the xml
file?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-configuration-with-Text-files-tp22438201p22440089.html
Sent from the Solr -
This functionality is possible 'out of the box', right? Or am I going to need
to code up something that reads in the id named files and generates the xml
file?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-configuration-with-Text-files-tp22438201p22440095.html
Sent from the Solr -
of files and read their contents into a field.
> [an example of this on the wiki would be handy, or a pointer to it if
> it doesn't already exist]
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 2:01 PM, KennyN wrote:
>
>>
>> This functionality is possib
I have a two core multicore setup which currently has identical indices (just
for testing, they will have different data when i deploy the system). I
based this off the example, so core0 and core1. I have customized the
scheme.xml and solrconfig.xml files(core0 and core1 are identical except
that
wrote:
>
> Do you have unique ids across shards?
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
> KennyN wrote:
>> I have a two core multicore setup which currently has identical indices
>> (just
>> for testing, they will have different da
I am still trying to figure this out... I am thinking maybe I have the shards
setup wrong? If I have core0 and core1 with indices, and then I run the
query on core0, specifying shards of core0 and core1. Is this how I should
be doing it? Or should I have another core just to specify the other shar
Thanks for the reply ahammad, that helps. Are you specifying them both in a
URL, or in the localhost:8983/solr/core0,localhost:8983/solr/core1 like
I have?
I should add that I now have two indices that have different data in them.
That is to say the ids are unique across both shards and I am sti
