Hi,
I'm new to solr so apologies if the solution is already documented.
I have installed and populated a solr index using the examples as a template
with a version of the data below.
I have XML in the form of
123898-2092099098982
Blu-Ray
2011-05-05T11:25:35+0500
The data is being imported directly from mysql. The document is however
indeed a good starting place.
Thanks
2011/5/18 Yury Kats
> On 5/18/2011 4:19 PM, Judioo wrote:
>
> > Any help is greatly appreciated. Pointers to documentation that address
> my
> > issues is even more
as is?
2011/5/18 Yury Kats
> On 5/18/2011 4:19 PM, Judioo wrote:
>
> > Any help is greatly appreciated. Pointers to documentation that address
> my
> > issues is even more helpful.
>
> I think this would be a good start:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Usage_with_XML.2BAC8-HTTP_Datasource
>
What is the "best practice" method to index the following in Solr:
I'm attempting to use solr for a book store site.
Each book will have a price but on occasions this will be discounted. The
discounted price exists for a defined time period but there may be many
discount periods. Each discount wi
ply
> re-index the book information with a multiValued "discounts" field
> and get something similar to your example (&wt=json)
>
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Judioo wrote:
> > What is the "best practice" method to index
discounts currently active
* get all books using ISDN retrieved from above search
Not that bad. However what happens when I want
"all books that are currently on discount in the "horror" genre containing
the word 'elm' in the title."
The only way I can see in caterin
gets, and unfortunately the only way to figure that out is to test.
>
> But that's the first approach I'd try.
>
> Good luck!
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Judioo wrote:
> > On 5 June 2011 14:42, Erick Erickson wrote:
> >
> >> See:
example of the best method to approach my problem,
although Erick has help me understand the limitations of Solr.
Just thought I'd say.
On 6 June 2011 20:26, Judioo wrote:
> Thanks
>
>
> On 6 June 2011 19:32, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
>> #Everybody# (includ
d
> field-collapsing. Each, IMO, is trying to deal with different aspects of
> dealing with hieararchical or multi-class data, or data that is entities
> with relationships. ).
>
>
> On 6/6/2011 3:43 PM, Judioo wrote:
>
>> I do think that Solr would be better served if there was
Hi All,
Question on best methods again :)
I have the following type of document.
Tron
.
where theater identifies the place where the film is showing. Each theater
is stored in another document. I want to store the timings in the same
document as the film details.
Hi
I'm confused about exactly how boosts relevancy scores work.
Apologies if I am violating this groups etiquette but I could not find
solr's paste bin anywhere.
I have 2 document types but want to return any documents where the requested
ID appears. The ID appears in multiple attributes but I w
Apologies
I have tried that method as well.
/solr/select/?q=b007vty6&defType=dismax&qf=id^10%20parent_id^9%20brand_container_id^8%20series_container_id^8%20subseries_container_id^8%20clip_container_id^1%20clip_episode_id^1&debugQuery=on&fl=id,parent_id,brand_container_id,series_container_id,subser
so all attributes except 'id' are of type text.
I didn't know that about the string type. So is my problem as described (
that partial matches are contributing to the calculation ) and does defining
the filed type as string solve this problem.
Or is my understanding completely incorrect?
Th
String also does not seem to accept spaces. currently the _id fields can
contain multiple ids ( using as a multiType alternative ). This is why I
used the text type.
On 15 June 2011 12:16, Judioo wrote:
> stored="true"/>
>
> so all attributes except 'id' are
t
> their relative scores.
>
> Finally, your next e-mail hints at what's happening. If you're
> putting multiple tokens in some of these fields, the length
> normalization may be causing the matches to score lower. You can
> try disabling those calculations (omitNorms=&
WONDERFUL!
Just reporting back.
This document is ACE
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
For explaining what the filters are and how to affect the analyzer.
Erik your statement "First, boosting isn't absolute" played on me so
I continued to investigate boosting.
I found
Hi,
As a proof of concept I have imported around ~11 million document in a solr
index. my schema file has multiple fields defined
Above being the most important for my question.
The average document has around 40 attributes. Each document has:
* a minimum of 2 tdate fileds ( max of 10)
*
I have replicated a solr instance without configs as the slave has
it's own config.
The replication has failed. My plan was to use replication to remove
the indexes I no longer wish to use which is why the slave has a
different schema.xml file.
Does anyone know why the replication has failed?
Th
Hi
Say I have a field type in multiple documents which can be either
type:bike
type:boat
type:car
type:van
and I want to order a search to give me documents in the following order
type:car
type:van
type:boat
type:bike
Is there a way I can do this just using the &sort method?
Thanks
Thanks,
Yes this is the work around I am currently doing.
Still wondering is the sort method can be used alone.
On 29 June 2011 18:34, Michael Ryan wrote:
> You could try adding a new int field (like "typeSort") that has the desired
> sort values. So when adding a document with type:car, als
20 matches
Mail list logo
