(...),
on...)
If the third stream is joined on a different key you can nest inside a
hashJoin which doesn't require streams to be sorted on the join key. For
example:
hashJoin(innerJoin(...),
hashed=search(...),
on..)
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspo
),
workers="20",
zkHost="zk1:2345",
sort="userId asc"
),
hashed=search(restaurants, q="city:nyc",
fl=&
One thing to note about the hashJoin is that it requires the search results
from the hashed query to fit entirely in memory.
The innerJoin does not have this requirement as it performs a streaming
merge join.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Joel
doesn't work properly it makes sense to file a bug report.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Akiel Ahmed wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried a straight forward join against something that is connected to
> many things but didn't get the results
The http parameter "stream" was recently changed to "expr" in SOLR-8443.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> I'll preface this email by saying that I wasn't sure which mailing list it
> b
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, please create the ticket. I believe all that
needs to be done is to check for null and then throw a better exception.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up Joel. Glad t
I haven't had a chance to review. If you have a reproducible failure on a
one-to-many join go ahead and create a jira ticket.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Akiel Ahmed wrote:
> Hi
>
> Did you get a chance to check whether one-to-m
involve scoring.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Dennis Gove wrote:
> There have been a lot of new features added to the Streaming API and the
> documentation hasn't kept pace, but it is something I'd like to have filled
> in by t
Yes that would work. Each search(...) has it's own specific params and can
point to any handler that conforms to the output format in the /select
handler.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Dennis Gove wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong
),
which are available in Solr 5.
Trunk has a much large set of expressions, but they have not yet been
documented. They will be documented before the 6.0 release.
If you can describe your use case in detail I can let you know if there is
an expression in Solr 5 or trunk (Solr 6) that would fit.
Joel
There are a number of map/reduce join implementations available in Trunk.
These are map/reduce joins where the entire result sets are shuffled to
worker nodes. All of this code is in the org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.stream
package if you'd like to review.
Joel Bernstein
The /export handler is using DocValues for export, which stores the
multi-value fields as a sorted set. So the sorting is the expected
behavior. If you have duplicates in the multi-value field this could
account for the list being of different sizes.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
Perhaps you can achieve what you're trying to do with a prefix on the data
so the sort is maintained and duplicates are not eliminated.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> The /export handler is using DocValues for expor
Which version of Solr are you using?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:39 AM, sara hajili wrote:
> hi all
> i have a MLT query and i wanna to use collapse filter query.
> and i wanna to use collapse expand nullPolicy.
> in this way wh
I believe this is a bug. I think the reason this is occurring is that you
have an index segment with no values at all in the collapse field. If you
could create a jira ticket for this I will look at resolving the issue.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:03 PM
I'll create it later today and update this thread with the Jira number.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:15 PM, sara hajili wrote:
> Tnx.How I can create a jira ticket?
> On Jan 11, 2016 10:42 PM, "Joel Bernstein" wrote:
>
> &
I went to go work on the issue and found it was already fixed 7 weeks ago.
The bug fix is available in Solr 5.4.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> You can go to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR/ and create J
> collapse filter.
> If I wont to immigrate to solr 5.4.
> Is any other approach to get distinct value that I can use in solr 5.3.1?
> On Jan 12, 2016 1:39 AM, "Joel Bernstein" wrote:
>
> > I went to go work on the issue and found it was already fixed 7 weeks
Try converting the long to a float using:
Float.intBitsToFloat((int)val).
It should come back with the correct float.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:35 PM, plbarrios wrote:
> I have a defined field in my schema.xml that is a simple float that is
DocValues caches. So you may need to re-index your data to use
this feature.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Salman Ansari
wrote:
> Thanks Emir, Susheel and Jack for your responses. Just to update, I am
> using Solr Cloud plus I want to get the
t, streaming expressions, and how to select the best
> one for a given use case.)
>
> (And Joel is going to promise to update the doc for this stored field
> restriction, right?!)
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Joel Bernstein
> wrote:
&
I'm wondering how difficult it would be to get the highlighter working on
expanded results. I think it's worth creating a jira request for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Anil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Solr expanded results are
es to export
would support queries like:
select id, title, score from tableX where a = '(a query)'
Where currently you can only do this:
select id, title, score from tableX where a = '(a query)' limit 1000
Can you create a jira for this and link it to SOLR-8125
Yeah, a DocTransformer would seem to be a good route to go. Not sure how
difficult it would be to do highlighting through the doc transformer.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Erik Hatcher
wrote:
> Maybe as a DocTransformer?
>
> > On
large overhead involved with top level String docValues. Then I
would change your scorer to work directly with BytesRef rather then
converting to the utf8 String.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:13 AM, adfel70 wrote:
> I am using RankQuery to implement
This issue has not been fixed yet. It does not appear that it's being
worked on at the moment.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Anil wrote:
> HI,
>
> was there any fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6690 ? or
> any
Take a look at SolrStream and CloudSolrStream. These are available since
Solr 5.1 but the 6.0 release will greatly improved on the streaming
capabilities.
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-streaming-api-solrjio-basics.html
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016
.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Brian Narsi wrote:
> I am using
>
> Solr 5.1.0
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Binoy Dalal
> wrote:
>
> > What version of Solr are you using?
> > Have you taken a look at the Coll
The CollapsingQParserPlugin shouldn't have duplicates in the result set.
Can you provide the details?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Brian Narsi wrote:
> I have tried to use the Collapsing feature but it appears that it leaves
>
Yeah that would be the reason. If you want distributed unique capabilities,
then you might want to start testing out 6.0. Aside from SELECT DISTINCT
queries, you also have a much more mature Streaming Expression library
which supports the unique operation.
Joel Bernstein
http
A few questions for you: What types of fields and how many fields will you
be retrieving? What version of Solr are you using?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Mark Robinson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement where I need to retrieve
Also are you ranking documents by score
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> A few questions for you: What types of fields and how many fields will you
> be retrieving? What version of Solr are you using?
>
> Jo
With collapse and expand the facet counts will be calculated for the
collapsed data set. You can also use the tag/exclude feature to exclude the
collapse filter query and generate facets on the uncollapsed set.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Anil
the /stream handler it will execute the
expression for you.
The UpdateStream uses CloudSolrClient to send the documents to Solr.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> I'd suggest using CloudSolrClient. It uses ConcurrentU
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492 shows an example of the
AnalyticsQuery where the merge is being handled by the Streaming API. I
actually think this is nicer then then using MergeStrategy. The Streaming
API gives you full control over the merge from the shards.
Joel Bernstein
http
This ticket might support Solr's JDBC driver in Solr 6.
https://github.com/grafana/grafana/issues/1542
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Jon Drews wrote:
> It would be really neat if Grafana supported Solr. They recently added
> El
I don't know of any contrib or module that does this. Can you describe why
you'd want to route documents to shards based on similarity? What
advantages would you get by using this approach?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:36 PM, davidphil
x if you're not
getting good results.
I would check the search performance you're getting on each shard. It may
very be that you just need to speed up the searches on the shards
themselves, rather then trying to limit the search to a subset of shards.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blo
cific use case.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Dennis Gove wrote:
> The Streaming API with Streaming Expressions (or Parallel SQL if you want
> to use SQL) can give you the functionality you're looking for. See
> https://cwiki.apache.org
You may also want to keep an eye on SOLR-8925 which supports distributed,
cross collection graph traversals. This may be useful in traversing the
relationships.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Solr now has full distribu
.
But the specific use cases need to be tested.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> It will be interesting to see which use cases work best with the new
> streaming JOIN vs. which will remain best with full denormalizati
I think people are going to be surprised though by the speed of the joins.
The joins also get faster as the number of shards, replicas and worker
nodes grow in the cluster. So we may see people building out large clusters
and and using the joins in OLTP scenarios.
Joel Bernstein
http
:20:28 EDT 2016
org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/package-info.class
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Reth RM wrote:
> Note: I followed the steps mentioned in the pdf attached on this Jira
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8521
&g
What version of DbVisualizer are you using?
When I tested I was using the latest version.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Reth RM wrote:
> output of command :
>
> org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/
>META-INF/services/java.sql.Dr
Ok, I think I know the problem you're running into. You'll need to load the
solr-solrj jar after loading the jars in the solrj-lib. Otherwise DbVis
seems to get confused and lose the driver class. We'll work on putting out
a single jar for the JDBC driver.
Joel
trade off memory for performance.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Reth RM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, is the concern related to same field value being stored twice: with
> stored=true and docValues=true? If that is the case, there is a jira
>
Solr 6.0, feel free to post the
Expression you're using and I or other people can help debug the issue.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:29 PM, sudsport s wrote:
> I see that some work was done to remove stream handler form config. so
> enabli
We really still need to know more about your use case. In particular what
types of questions will you be asking of the data? It's useful to do this
in plain english without mapping to any specific implementation.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:
6.1
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Mark Robinson
wrote:
> Thanks much everyone!
> Appreciate your responses.
>
> Best,
> Mark
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Jay Potharaju
> wrote:
>
> > On the same lines
Can you post your stack trace? I suspect this has to do with how the
Streaming API is interacting with SolrCloud. We can probably also create a
jira ticket for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Ryan Yacyshyn
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I&#x
This is the type of thing that Streaming Expressions does well, but there
isn't one yet for the suggester. Feel free to add a SuggestStream jira
ticket, it should be very easy to add.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Pranaya Behera
wrote:
It appears that you are not formatting the streaming expression properly.
Can you post your entire http request?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Chaushu, Shani
wrote:
> Yes I'm running in solr cloud mode.
> I managed to make the query wo
Sure take a look at the RandomStream. You can copy the basic structure of
it but have it work with the suggester. The link below shows the test cases
as well:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/7b5f12e622f10206f3ab3bf9f79b9727c73c6def
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On
Try putting quotes around the fl parameter.
search(collections_test,
q="*:*",
fl="id,name,inStock",
sort="id asc")
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Chaushu, Shani
wrote:
> U tri
back to the client. In branch_6x this is fixed. You can still see
the root cause in the logs in both Solr 6.0 and 6.1.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Chaushu, Shani
wrote:
> It worked!
> thanks
>
> -Original Message-----
> F
()) {
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Ryan Yacyshyn
wrote:
> Yes stack trace can be found here:
>
> http://pastie.org/10821638
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 at 01:05 Joel Bernstein wrote:
>
> > Can you post your stack t
I'll look into this today.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Risden
wrote:
> What I think is happening is that since the CloudSolrClient is from the
> SolrCache and the collection was reloaded. zkStateReader is actually null
> sinc
the
StreamHandler.
So I think the correct fix is to create the SolrClientCache in inform(),
that way it will get recreated with each reload. As long as the closeHook
has closed the existing SolrClientCache this shouldn't cause any connection
leaks with reloads.
Joel Bernstein
I opened SOLR-9059.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> What I believe is happening is that the core is closing on the reload,
> which is triggering the closeHook and shutting down all the connections in
> SolrCl
Ryan, there is a patch (for the master branch) up on SOLR-9059 that
resolves the issue. This will be in 6.1 and 6.0.1 if there is one. Thanks
for the bug report!
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> I opened SOLR-9059.
>
ering if you're tripping a ClassNotFoundException once the parsing of
the json result comes back. I've seen instances where
ClassNotFoundExceptions get swallowed.
Can you post your classpath?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:57 AM, deniz wrote:
>
adata Tuple. The error you are seeing will occur if the metadata Tuple
is not present or if the first Tuple is null. My guess is the first Tuple
is null do to a ClassNotFoundException which is getting swallowed up during
the parse.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:
Yes, this needs to be supported. If you open up a ticket, I'll be happy to
review.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:24 PM, sudsport s wrote:
> I tried to run solr streaming expression using collection alias , I get
> null pointer expression. af
f the ReRanker. I think
it's a good idea but it's not implemented yet.
I'm not sure if anyone has any ideas about conditionally adding the
ReRanker using configurations?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Hi guys,
client appears to be from the 6.0 release but
the server could be an older version.
The reason I ask this, is that older versions of the /sql handler don't
have the metadata Tuple logic. So the query would be processed correctly
but the metadata Tuple wouldn't be there.
Joel Bern
ack on the secondary score sort or remove the reRanker.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> many thanks for the response and sorry for this late reply.
>
> About the first question, I can open a JIRA
You may want to check this out:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62693238
It does aggregations that might work for you.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Nick Vasilyev
wrote:
> I guess it would also work if I co
r and uses the default
rows and start.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Roshan Kamble <
roshan.kam...@smartstreamrdu.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a plan to use streaming API for join queries.
>
> But it has been observed that C
Yes, /sql has been in trunk / master for a long time (more then 6 months).
But it was not released in the 5x branch because it requires Java 8.
I'm wondering what the issue is with the server setup that you have that is
throwing the NPE.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon
Hi,
The example in the cwiki would require setting up the people and pets
collections. Unless I'm mistaken this won't work with the out of the box
schemas. So you'll need to setup some test schemas to get started. Although
having out of the box streaming schemas is a great idea.
The example is using two collections: people and pets. So these collections
would need to be present for the join expression to work.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Ryan Cutter wrote:
> Thanks Joel, I added the personId and ownerId fields bef
Can you post the entire stack trace? I'd like to see what line the NPE is
coming from. The line you pasted in is coming from the wrapper exception I
believe.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Ryan Cutter wrote:
> Yes, the people collection
The block of code the NPE is coming from is where the collection nodes are
being gathered for the query. So this points to some issue with the cloud
setup or the query.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Can you post the ent
same shard.
We should make this clear in the documentation.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Peter Lee wrote:
> From my reading of the solr docs (e.g.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collapse+and+Expand+Results
>
fields with an accurate group count.
If you don't need ngroups, then Grouping is usually just as fast if not
faster.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Your findings are the expected behavior for the Collapsing qpar
em so we can get all the error messages covered.
Thanks,
Joel
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Selvam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, it is working now.
>
> curl --data-urlencode
> 'stream=search(gettingstarted,q="*:*",fl=&
Can you describe your use case?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Selvam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, good to know, in fact my requirement needs to merge multiple
> expressions, while current streaming expressions supports only two
> exp
This sounds doable using nested merge functions like this:
merge(search(...),
merge(search(...), search(),...), ...)
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Selvam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I needed to run a multiple subqueries each with its own
You'll want to check to see if there are any static warming queries being
run as well.
How often are you committing and opening a new searcher? Are you using
autoCommits or explicitly committing?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Adrian Liew
Can you explain your use case a little more?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Kiran Sai Veerubhotla
wrote:
> how can i use collapse & expand on the docValues with json facet api?
>
The merge strategy probably won't work for the type of distributed collapse
you're describing.
You may want to begin exploring the Streaming API which supports real-time
map/reduce operations,
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2015/03/parallel-computing-with-solrcloud.html
Joel Bern
things like fully
distributed grouping.
How many records are processed in a typical query and what type of response
time do you need?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:25 PM, tedsolr wrote:
> Thanks Joel, that link looks promising. The CloudSolrStream bypasse
own RankQuery should be the last resort if you can't make a
Function Query do what you need to do.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Ajinkya Kale
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am new to Solr. I have a QParser plugin which uses an imple
The syntax would be something like this:
q=hello+world&rq={!rerank reRankQuery=$rqq
reRankDocs=100}&rqq={!func}myFunc()
I'm not sure if there is a test case demonstrating this but it should work.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ajinky
Have you looked at your Solr instance with a cpu profiler like YourKit? It
would be useful to see the hotspots which should be really obvious with 20
second response times.
Also are you running in distributed mode or on a single Solr instance?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon
Can you also try testing with one facet at a time and see if we hit a
particular facet that is slow?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Uwe Reh wrote:
> The exact version as shown by the UI is:
> - solr-impl 5.3.0 1696229 - noble - 2015-08-17
Hi Marshall,
This sounds pretty reasonable. I should have some to review the patch later
in the week.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Sanders, Marshall (AT - Atlanta) <
marshall.sand...@autotrader.com> wrote:
> Well I didn't receive
It's an interesting question. The JDBC driver is still very basic. It would
depend on how much of the JDBC spec needs to be implemented to connect to
Calcite/Drill.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Kai Gülzau wrote:
>
> We are currently
After reading https://calcite.apache.org/docs/tutorial.html, I think it
should be possible to use the Solr's JDBC Driver with Calcites JDBC adapter.
If you give it a try and run into any problems, please create a jira.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 7:
restaurantId"
)
The parallel function will return the tuples from the innerJoin which is
performed on 20 workers in this example. The worker nodes will be selected
from "workerCollection" which can be any SolrCloud collection with enough
nodes. The "partitionKeys" parameter ha
Ryan,
This looks like a good jira ticket to me.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Ryan Josal wrote:
> Hey guys, I put a rq in defaults but I can't figure out how to override it
> with no rankquery. Looks like one option might be checkin
The expand component only displays the groups heads when it finds expanded
documents in the group. And it only expands for the current page.
Are you finding situations where there are group heads on the page, that
have child documents that are not being expanded?
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer
The expanded section will only include groups that have expanded documents.
So, if the document that in the main result set has no documents to expand,
then this is working as expected.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
> Hi
&g
You should be able to use collapse/expand with one result.
Does the document in the main result set have group members that aren't
being expanded?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
> If I want to group the results (by a
there is an expanded group.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> You should be able to use collapse/expand with one result.
>
> Does the document in the main result set have group members that aren't
> being expan
Exactly correct.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
> Hi Joel
>
> Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
> Using supplier id as the field to collapse on.
>
> - If thecollapse group heads inthe main result set has
release.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
> Hi Joel
>
> Is the number of documents info available when using collapse and expand
> parameters?
>
> I can't seem to find it in the return xml.
> I know the numFound
This should be resolved in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6323.
Solr 4.10.3
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ryan Josal wrote:
> Using edismax, supplying a rq= param, like {!rerank ...} is causing an
> UnsupportedOperationExc
Just confirmed that wildcard queries work with Re-Ranking following
SOLR-6323.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> This should be resolved in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6323
> .
>
> Solr 4.10.3
>
&
For your own implementation you'll need to implement the following methods:
public Query rewrite(IndexReader reader) throws IOException
public void extractTerms(Set terms)
You can review the 4.10.3 version of the ReRankQParserPlugin to see how it
implements these methods.
Joel Bernstein
1 - 100 of 762 matches
Mail list logo
