putting the solr data in SAN.
>
> Hi,
> I'm jus wondering if anybody has experinces about putting the solr
> data in SAN instead of local disk. Is there a big performance penalty?
> Please share with me your experiences.
> Thank you very much.
> Yongjun Rong
>
--
I think you should justs break up your index across boxes and do a
"federated search" across them...
since you mentioned you have a single machine..
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our
e
query...
QueryResponse queryResponse = SolrServer.query(customScoreQuery);
//will work, BUT I NEED to use the filter as well...
Thanks
--
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our
enemies, justice wi
query.addFilterQuery( "type:xxx" );
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Jeryl Cook wrote:
>
>> i can execute what i want simply with using lucene directly
>>
>> Hits hits = searcher.search(customScoreQuery, myQuery.getFilter());
>>
>>
>> howerver, i can
, at 2:24 PM, Jeryl Cook wrote:
>
>> I don't have issues adding a filter query to a "SolrQuery"...
>>
>> i guess ill look at the source code, i just need to pass the a custom
>> Filter object at runtime before i execute a search using the
>> SolrSe
is there a limit on the number of facets that i can create in
Solr?(dynamically generated facets.)
--
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our
enemies, justice will be done."
--George W. Bush, Ad
answer, but it totally depends on your
> data and your needs.
>
>
>
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Jeryl Cook wrote:
>
>> is there a limit on the number of facets that i can create in
>> Solr?(dynamically generated facets.)
>>
>> --
>> Jeryl Cook
>&g
he "it depends" answer, but it totally depends on
>> your data and your needs.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Jeryl Cook wrote:
>>
>>> is there a limit on the number of facets that i can create in
>>> Solr?(dynamically generat
i am using embeddedSolrServer and simply has a queue that documents
are sent to ..and a listerner on that queue that writes it to the
index..
or just keep it simple, and do a synchronization block around the
method in the writeserver that writes the document to the index.
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh
are you trying to unit test something? I would simply make use of the
Embedded SOLR component in your unit tests..
On 11/27/08, Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of an easy to use Mock solr server?
>
> Thanks
> Rob
>
--
Jery
hread
>
> Exception in thread "JmxRmiRegistryConnectionPoller"
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
>
>
>
> We are running JDK 1.6_10 on the solaris box. . The weird thing is we
> are running the same application on linux box with JDK 1.6 and we
>
looks cool :), how about a talking mascot as
Jeryl Cook
twoenc...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Mathijs Homminga
wrote:
> Good choice!
>
> Mathijs Homminga
>
> Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>> (replies to solr-user please)
>>
>> On behalf of the
http://www.aduna-software.com/technologies/aperture/overview.view
this component Aperture worked for me..
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our
enemies, justice will be done."
--George W. Bush,
"hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit this in JIRA
for terrocotta support!
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"..Act your age, and not your shoe size.."
-Prince(1986)
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300
> From: [E
searching.Also it uses "virtual memory" , so the amount of "documents"
stored in the RAMDirectory is only limited to space.
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:46:19 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-use
not yet implemented ,hopefully soon :
http://jira.terracotta.org/jira/browse/CDV-399
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"..Act your age, and not your shoe size.."
-Prince(1986)
> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:33:58 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTE
faceted browse.
Jeryl Cook
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Any tips
> for indexing large amounts of data?> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:30:50 -0400> >
> Hi,> > I am creating an index of approx 500K documents. I wrote an index
Jeryl Cook /^\ Pharaoh /^\ http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ "..Act your
age, and not your shoe size.." -Prince(1986)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: start.jar -Djetty.port= not working>
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:13:22 -0500> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
efine it in the schema.xml
is this just a something that is not implemented? or am i missing something...
Thanks.
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"..Act your age, and not your shoe size.."
-Prince(1986)
> Date: Fri, 30 No
fixed, i had a typo...may want to delete my post( i want to :P .)
Jeryl Cook
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: DynamicField and FacetFields..
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 14:21:12 -0500
>
> Question:
> I need to dynamically data to SOL
there currently is no way to use RAMDirectory instead of FSDirectory
yet in SOLR, however there is a feature request to implement this.
I personally think this will be great because we could use Terracotta
to handle the clustering.
Jeryl Cook
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Norberto Meijome
e.
>
> If this is not possible to do, is it really necessary to restart the
> entire application server for a change in schema.xml to have effect?
> Or only the solr webapp?
>
> Regards
> /Jimi
>
--
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." -Prince(1986)
me :)..
FYI:
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/tcforge/Proposal+-+Terracotta+for+Lucene
Jeryl Cook
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > just
Is it possible to simply change configuration to use RAMDirectory , instead of
the FSDirectory..if not it would be great to have this as possible option int
he configuration fileThe Master/Worker pattern used for handling
scalability works(outlined in SOLR manual/wiki).its a proven
patt
Thanks for the responses (smile..)...actually looking over the message board,
looks like i can achieve this with the "embedded" version of SOLR uses the
lucene RAMDirectory to store the index..Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"..Act your ag
how performance will be".,etci was
trying to get it working..andload test the hell out it, and see how it acts
with large amounts of data, and how it ompares with SOLR using typical
FSDirectory approach.i plan to post findings..Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blog
We'd be>
more than happy to help you get this stuff working.> > Cheers,> Orion> > >
Jeryl Cook wrote:> > > > Thats the thing,Terracotta persists everything it has
in memory to the> > disk when it overflows(u can set how much u want to use in
memory), or>
27 matches
Mail list logo
