Why not pass the parameters using "?parameter1=value1¶meter2=value2" ?
mvg,
Jasper
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Or write your own query component mapping /solr/* in the web.xml, exposing
> the request by a thread-local through a filter, and reading this setting the
Hi all,
we've been running Solr 1.4 for about a year with no real problems. As
of monday it became impossible to do a full import on our master
because of an OOM. Now what I think is strange is that even after we
more than doubled the available memory there would still always be an
OOM. We seem t
Perhaps I am missing the obvious but our slaves tend to run out of
disk space. The index sizes grow to multiple times the size of the
master. So I just toss all the data and trigger a replication.
However, can't solr handle this for me?
I'm sorry if I've missed a simple setting which does this for
mvg,
Jasper
> You may also want to look at your Index report in SPM
> (http://sematext.com/spm) before/during/after replication and share what you
> see.
>
> Otis
>
> Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase -
> http://sematext.com/spm
>
>
r one, right? If so,
> why is commit needed when you *read* data from DB?
>
> Otis
>
> Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase -
> http://sematext.com/spm
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Jasper Floor
>> To: solr
g over a longer period of time
>> than just a single replication, is that true?
>>
>> Best
>> Erick
>>
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Jasper Floor wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
>>
Btw, confirmed that this doesn't happen on our development stage with 3.6.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Jasper Floor wrote:
> The slave index does indeed grow over a period of time regardless of
> restarts. We do run on 1.4 however. We will be updating to 3.6 very
> soon how
Hi all,
It seems that DIH always holds two connections open to the database.
One of them is almost always 'idle in transaction'. It may sometimes
seem to do a little work but then it goes idle again.
datasource definition:
We have a datasource defined in the jndi:
> caused some log warnings, and it wouldn't work at all without readOnly=false.
> Not sure abour PostgreSql.
>
> James Dyer
> E-Commerce Systems
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jasper Floor [mailto:jasper.fl..
at 4:49 PM, Jasper Floor wrote:
> Actually, the readOnly=true makes things worse.
> What it does (among other things) is:
> c.setTransactionIsolation(Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED);
>
> which leads to:
> Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Cann
10 matches
Mail list logo