MultiValue dynamicField and copyField

Hi everyone, i was wondering if the following was possible somehow: As in: using copyField to copy a multiValued field into another multiValued field. Cheers, Jan

AW: MultiValue dynamicField and copyField

I figured out where the problem was. The destination wildcard was actually matching the wrong field. I changed the fieldnames around a bit and now everything works fine. Thanks! > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: kenf_nc [mailto:ken.fos...@realestate.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2

MultiCore config less stable than SingleCore?

Hi, i have recently moved Solr at one of our customers to a MultiCore environment running 2 indexes. Since then, we seem to be having problems with locks not being removed properly, .lock files keep sticking around in the index directory. Hence, any updates to the index keep returning 500 erro

Dynamically changing the stored-state of a dynamicField

ly, I only need a single field for each dataset tob e stored. Is there a way to parameterize the stored parameter on a per-field basis or do I have to add a second dynamicField like below to allow that? Thanks in advance! ---- Jan-Simon Winkelmann

Searching for empty fields possible?

Hi there, i have a field defined in my schema as follows: Valid values for the fields are (in theory) any unsigned integer value. Also the field can be empty. My problem is, that if I have (puid:[0 TO *] OR -puid:[* TO *]) as filter query i get 0 results, without the "-puid:[* TO *])" part i g

AW: Searching for empty fields possible?

7;s relevant just yet. What bugs me is that if I add the -puid:[* TO *], all results for puid:[0 TO *] disappear, even though I am using "OR". Best, Jan > On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Jan-Simon Winkelmann wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > i have a field defined

AW: AW: Searching for empty fields possible?

>> I'm not sure, theoretically fields with a null value >> (php-side) should end >> up not having the field. But then again i don't think it's >> relevant just >> yet. What bugs me is that if I add the -puid:[* TO *], all >> results for >> puid:[0 TO *] disappear, even though I am using "OR". > >-

Solr not starting JMX

in advance Jan-Simon Winkelmann

AW: Solr not starting JMX

: My parameters look like this (running the Solr example): : : java -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=6060 : -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false : -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -jar start.jar What implementation/version of java are you run

Solr-JMX/Jetty agentId

, but the MBeans simply don't show up in JConsole, so I would like to use . But where do I get the agentId? And what exactly does this Id represent? Does it change every time I restart Jetty? Thanks in advance! Jan-Simon Winkelmann

AW: Solr-JMX/Jetty agentId

2010/2/10 Jan Simon Winkelmann : > I am (still) trying to get JMX to work. I have finally managed to get a Jetty > installation running with the right parameters to enable JMX. Now the next > problem appeared. I need to get Solr to register ist MBeans with the Jetty > MBeanS

xml error when indexing

Hi, I'm having a strange problem when indexing data through our application. Whenever I post something to the update resource, I get Unexpected character 'a' (code 97) in prolog; expected '<' at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1,1], Error 400 Unexpected character 'a' (code 97) in prolog; expec

Strange search behavior

Hi, I'm having some problems understanding why certain search queries don't return any results. I have a field of type "text", which is defined like this:

copyField for dynamicFields

Best, Jan-Simon Winkelmann

AW: copyField for dynamicFields

gt; > regards, > Naga > > -----Original Message- > From: Jan Simon Winkelmann [mailto:winkelm...@newsfactory.de] > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:41 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: copyField for dynamicFields > > Hi, > > i have the follow

Slow Date-Range Queries

Hi, I am currently having serious performance problems with date range queries. What I am doing, is validating a datasets published status by a valid_from and a valid_till date field. I did get a performance boost of ~ 100% by switching from a normal solr.DateField to a solr.TrieDateField with

AW: Slow Date-Range Queries

> > ((valid_from:[* TO 2010-04-29T10:34:12Z]) AND > > (valid_till:[2010-04-29T10:34:12Z TO *])) OR ((*:* > > -valid_from:[* TO *]) AND (*:* -valid_till:[* TO *]))) > > > > I use the empty checks for datasets which do not have a > > valid from/till range. > > > > > > Is there any way to get this any

AW: Slow Date-Range Queries

For now I need them, I will however most likely (as suggested by Ahmet Arslan), create another boolean field to get rid of them, just simply due to the fact that I am switching to Solr 1.4 frange queries. On the topic of frange queries, is there a way to simulate the date range wildcards here?