Hi,
I have many document to be deleted and the xml file is built shown as below.
delete.xml
id:0286-14582373
id:0286-14582372
id:0286-14582371
id:0286-14582415
id:0286-14582414
id:0286-14582413
id:0286-14582412
id:0286-14582411
id:0286-14582410
id:0286-14582409
id:0286-14582408
Once I post it
I have 30 millions document indexed and tried sort by "sequenceid" which is
unique over the document.
I am experiencing "very slow" than sort by pub_date.
sequenceid is not defined as "unique key" in the schema.xml and there is the
"unique key" defined in schema.xml - item_id.
Anyone knows why?
T
Is there any way to sort by index id - descending? (by order of indexed)
Thanks,
Jae
Finding the way how to sort by internal_docid desc.
Thanks,
Jae
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to sort by index id - descending? (by order of indexed)
>
> Thanks,
> Jae
>
You can adjust the performance of indexing by configuring of these parameters.
false
10
1000
2147483647
1
Jae
-Original Message-
From: Britske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 4/5/2008 10:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: indexing slow,
I do have a same situation. Got 30 million indexed and deleted 3
millions.
DELETE can not be posted as same way as "ADD". We can add multiple
documents in the file, but not for DELETE.
If there is "RANGE" of ID, make the range first then delete the record
in index by
{URL} id:[xxx TO yyy].
T
Hi,
I am looking for "the best or possible" way to add WEIGHT to each core in
multi core environment.
core 1 has about 10 millions articles from same publisher and core 2 and 3
have less than 10k.
I would like to have BALANCED Query result - ex. 10 from core 1, 10 from
core 2 and 10 from core 3..
.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> > From: Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:07:54 AM
> > Subject: Multi core weight
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am lo
Is there any way to query - find the string which first char is "a" or "A".
Thanks,
Jae
I have multiple 100 M documents using Nested Document for joining. It is
the fastest way for joining in a single replica. By adding more replicas (2
or 3), the performance is slow down significantly. (about 100x times).
Does anyone have same experience?
Jae
In 8.3, There should be the way to preserve the original terms, but could
not find it.
Does anyone know?
Thanks,
Jae
putting original term in the synonym list works.
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 1:05 PM atin janki wrote:
> Hi Jae,
>
> Do try to explain your problem with an example. Also share how you are
> writing the synonyms file.
> Best Regards,
> Atin Janki
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 202
I am seeing the nullPointerException in the list below and I am
looking for how to fix the exception.
Thanks,
NamedList sortFieldValues =
(NamedList)(srsp.getSolrResponse().getResponse().get("sort_values"));
if (sortFieldValues.size()==0 && // we bypass merging this response
only if it's partial
8.3.1
the field "id" is for nested document.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:17 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Hi,
> What's the version? What's uniqueKey? is it stored? what's fl param?
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:12 PM Jae Joo wrote:
>
> > I
ould be supplied at
> QueryComponent.doFieldSortValues(ResponseBuilder, SolrIndexSearcher).
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 4:19 PM Jae Joo wrote:
>
> > 8.3.1
> >
> > > required="true" multiValued="false" docValues="true"/>
> &
I have a cluster with 8 nodes for 24 shards with replicaFactor=3 and have
only 4 nodes have the leader replicas.
Is there any way to redistribute the lead nodes to cross of all 8 nodes?
Thanks,
I have 10 collections in single alias and having different result sets for
every time with the same query.
Is it as designed or do I miss something?
The configuration and schema for all 10 collections are identical.
Thanks,
Jae
out of sync.
>
> > On Aug 12, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Jae Joo wrote:
> >
> > I have 10 collections in single alias and having different result sets
> for
> > every time with the same query.
> >
> > Is it as designed or do I miss something?
> >
> >
ou may think is sync’d may actually not be. How do
> you validate correct sync ?
>
> > On Aug 12, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Jae Joo wrote:
> >
> > The replications are all synched and there are no updates while I was
> > testing.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug
Good question. How can I validate if the replicas are all synched?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:28 PM Jae Joo wrote:
> numFound is same but different score.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:01 PM Aroop Ganguly
> wrote:
>
>> Try a simpl
I found it the root cause. I have 3 collections assigned to a alias and one
of them are NOT synched.
By the alias.
Collection 1
Collection 2
Collection 3
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:29 PM Jae Joo wrote:
> Good question. How can I validate if the repli
HI,
Is there any way to stop the job running in Async mode?
Thanks,
I have timeAllowed=2000 (2sec) and having mostly 0 hits coming out. Should
I have more than 0 results?
Jae
I forgot how to enter multivalued in Analysis Page in Admin.
Can anyone help?
Jae
Does increasing of Position Gap make Search Slow?
Jae
Is "smart" really smarter than one explicitly defined?
For "emun" type, would it be faster to define facet.method=enum than smart?
Jae
Is there any way to apply facet to the partial search result?
For ex, we have 10m return by "dog" and like to apply facet to first 10K.
Possible?
Jae
But if you’re
> missing some info, please feel free to comment (here or there), I could add
> some more info.
>
> Best regards,
> Radu
> --
> Sematext Cloud - Full Stack Observability - https://sematext.com
> Solr and Elasticsearch Consulting, Training and Production Support
&
I have the requirement to create field - xyz to be returned based on the
matched result.
Here Is the code .
XYZ:concat(
if(exists(query({!v='field1:12345'})), '12345', ''),
if(exists(query({!v='field1:23456'})), '23456', ''),
if(exists(query({!v='field1:34567'})), '34567', ''),
just try
> with a subquery
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/transforming-result-documents.html#TransformingResultDocuments-_subquery_
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:31 PM Jae Joo wrote:
>
> > I have the requirement to create field - xyz to be returned based on the
&
Does anyone have the experience to use HugePage and UseLargePage? How much
can we get the performance benefits from utilizing it?
The disk is NOT SSD and the sole node has 256 GB. The Heap is 31.99 G.
Thanks,
Jae
Is non CDCR replication in SolrCloud still working in Solr 9.0?
Jae
I am wondering that the performance of facet of DocValued SortableText
Field is slower than non Docvalued String Field.
Does anyone know why?
Thanks,
Jae
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo