rver?
>
> - Does the high number of CLOSE_WAIT have anything to do with search
> latency?
>
> Any suggestion on the matter is highly appreciated!
>
> Regards,
> Niraj
>
--
Jacques du Rand
Senior R&D Programmer
T:
d report back.
> Do you think having higher number of CLOSE_WAIT connections affects the
> over all search delivery speed?
>
> Regards,
> Niraj
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jacques du Rand >
> wrote:
>
> > Try to fiddle with your tcp settings:
>
the terms:-
> > >> *blue stainless washer*
> > >> ... returns a document which has *Stainless Washer *in one of my qf
> > >> fields, but *refrigerator *is not there in any of the qf fields. Then
> > >> how did it get returned even though I had given mm=100% (100%25 when I
>
Sorry I meant "Ahmet Arslan" answer :)
On 4 May 2016 at 11:56, Jacques du Rand wrote:
> Although Mark Robinson's answer is correct you are now using the DISMAX
> not the Edismax parser...
> You can also play around with changing q.op parameter to 'AND'
&g
rk=uoieuwqjdlsa
So if we reindex the data the cursorMark for search "foobar" and page2 will
the cursorMark value change ???
But google might have already index our page as "
http://mysite.com/search?foobar&page=2&cmark=djkldskljsdsa"; so that
cursorMark will keep cha
g_man,mainquery}manufacturer
2. q={!tag=mq}blah&facet.field={!ex=tag_man,mq}manufacturer
3. ...&facet.query=manufacturer:*
But I still only get the facets WITH the main query of "blah"
Any Ideas ?
--
Jacques du Rand
Senior R&D Programmer
T: +27214688017
F: +27
eld":["inStock",
> "{!key=exclude_x ex=x}inStock",
> "{!key=exclude_xy ex=x,y}inStock"],
> "fq":"{!tag=y}inStock:true",
> "rows":"0",
> "facet":"tr
: "OR",
rows: "20",
q: "{!tag=mq}nissan",
tie: "0.1",
facet.limit: "200",
defType: "edismax",
qf: "name name_raw",
facet.method: "fcs",
facet.threads: "6",
facet.mincount: "1",
pf3: "",
wt
mentioned before
>
>
> >>> You are attempting to exclude tags named "tag_make", "tag_model", and
> >>> "tag_mq" -- but the name of the tag you are using in the query is "mq"
> >>>
> >>> if you include "mq&qu
ANY documentation as to how to setup this thing ?
From: Doug Turnbull [dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Announcing "Splainer" -- Open Source Solr Sandbox
Thanks!
Abo
Do you index and search from this box ?
How many documents do you have ?
From: Shawn Heisey [s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 7:48 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr CPU Usage
On 8/27/2014 8:42 PM, hendra_budiawan wrote:
HI Hendra
That doesn't seem overly huge...
I agree with the other person saying, from the top/htop graph it doesnt look
too bad.
I will maybe try to split the searching/indexing as well try to "schedule" the
delta index for the cores at different times maybe
PS.We had a nice little bump in eff
12 matches
Mail list logo
