even if these examples are not formally released, at least people can view
and copy them.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr middle-ware?
Hello,
All the Solr
ot; remains for
now.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aleksander Akerø
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: KeywordTokenizerFactory - trouble with "exact" matches
Yes, I actually noted that about the filter vs. tokeni
g what the original
handler name was.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: StrW_dev
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 4:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Realtimeget SolrCloud
That seemed to be the issue.
I had several other request handlers as I wasn't using the s
What does your actual query look like? Is it two range queries and an AND?
Also, you have spaces in your field names, so that makes it more difficult
to write queries since they need to be escaped.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Avner Levy
Sent: Saturday, January 18
q=+term1 term2^0.6
Will require term1 but term2 is optional.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: abhishek jain
Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 10:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; 'Ahmet Arslan'
Subject: RE: Special character search in Solr and boosting withou
If SDL Tridion can export to CSV format, Solr can then import from CSV
format.
Otherwise, you may have to write a custom script or even maybe Java code to
read from SDL Tridion and output a supported Solr format, such as Solr XML,
Solr JSON, or CSV.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
PDF files can be directly imported into Solr using Solr Cell (AKA
ExtractingRequestHandler).
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Solr+Cell+using+Apache+Tika
Internally, Solr Cell uses Tika, which in turn uses PDFBox.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
I think he want to do a bunch of separate queries and return separate result
sets for each.
Hmmm... maybe it would be nice to allow multiple "q" parameters in one query
request, each returning a separate set of results.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Eric
Maybe you need a larger Java heap.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sathya
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Searching Issue
Hi Friends,
I am working in Solr 4.6.0 from last 2 months. i have indexed the data in
solr
nd queried using the Cassandra
API(s) as well.
To be clear, DSE is a "database", not a "search platform". The idea is that
DSE can be the system of record, with data stored in Cassandra and can
easily be reindexed for Solr at any time from that Cassandra data.
-- Jack Kr
nt of data processed can help. Any multivalued fields with lots of
values?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Joel Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 1:43 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lowering query time
1. We are faceting. I'm not a developer so I'
What will your queries be like? Will it be okay if they are relatively slow?
I mean, how many of those 100 fields will you need to use in a typical (95th
percentile) query?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mike L.
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 10:00 PM
To: solr-user
to a query.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Gregorio Binetti
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 5:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Disable searching on ddm tika metadata
Hi everybody,
I'm a newbie and I'm working on searching performance in
ush" model, as opposed to the
Solr DIH "pull" model.
See:
http://blog.mongodb.org/post/29127828146/introducing-mongo-connector
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: rachun
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 6:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Simply post to this mail list the timing section of the query response for a
test query that you feel is too slow, but be sure to add the debug=true
parameter (or debug=timing.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Gregorio Binetti
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 6:44
I’m not interested in the log (although maybe somebody else can spot something
there) – it’s the query response that is returned on your query HTTP request
(XML or JSON.) The specific parameter to add to your HTTP query request is
“&debug=true”.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Mauro Gregorio Bin
(Gulp!)
You could also set the debug parameter (temporarily) in the defaults section
of your query request handler. But you still need to dump the text of the
query response.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Gregorio Binetti
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:47
ce it will query for all
the sub-terms, but AND will only work if all the sub-terms occur in the
document field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Teague James
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:52 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Partial Word Search
I cannot
Tom, I did make an effort to "sort out" both the old and newer solr.xml
features in my Solr 4.x Deep Dive e-book.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tom Burton-West
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 5:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Default core f
Yes. Look at the example solrconfig.xml for a section labeled "defaults" for
the "/select" request handler. You should see "df" as one parameter. Just
copy that and change "df" to "debug" and change the field name to "true".
-- Jack
It appears that at this moment the best approach would be to write a Java
program that reads from MongoDB and writes to Solr (Solr XML update
requests.) Or, write a program that reads from MongDB and outputs a CSV
format text file and then import that directly into Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
omewhat to query complexity,
albeit in the name of better relevancy.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Srinivasa7
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:30 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Performance impact using edismax over dismax
Hi All,
I have a requirement to sear
work, at least for some simple cases.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Teague James
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Partial Word Search
Jack,
Thanks for responding! I had tried configuring this asymmetrically before
Use the pf parameter and then you won't have to modify the original query at
all! And you can add a boost for the phrase, which is a common practice.
pf=search-field^10.0
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Srinivasa7
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:21 AM
To: solr
I suspect that's a bug. The phrase boost code should have the logic to
exclude negated terms.
File a Jira.
Thanks for reporting this.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Geert Van Huychem
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 9:40 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Su
The UIMA component is not very error-friendly - NPE gets thrown for missing
or misspelled parameter names. Basically, you have to look at the source
code based on that stack trace to find out which parameter was missing.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: rashi gandhi
Sent
that more will definitely cause problems, but because you will
be beyond common usage and increasingly sensitive to amount of data and
Java/JVM performance capabilities.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mike L.
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2014 2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene
analyzer, etc.
More like type as merely inheriting attributes from another field/type.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2014 2:37 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: A bit lost in the land of schemaless Solr
Say that I have 10
ction would rarely need to be sharded.
You didn't speak at all about HA (High Availability) requirements or
replication.
Or about query latency requirements or query load - which can impact
replication requirements.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pisarev, Vit
.
That said, given Lucene/Solr's rich support for large tokenized fields, they
might be a better choice for representing large lists of entities - if
denormalization is not quite practical.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Luis Lebolo
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014
"Eric solrUser"~102
would match.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Nirali Mehta
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: positionIncrementGap in schema.xml - Doesn't seem to work
Erick,
Here is the example.
The
Try the complex phrase query parser:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604
Or in LucidWorks Search you can say:
J* NEAR:5 K*
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kashish
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
)))+OR+(field2:value2).
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Siegert
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solr-query with NOT and OR operator
Hi,
my solr-request contains the following filter-query:
fq=((-(field1:value1
a fault-tolerant,
fully-distributed system. Your application can/should make its own decision
as to what it will do if an indexing operation cannot be serviced.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: elmerfudd
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 7:54 AM
To: solr-user
computing
environment, coupled with multi-core processors and parallel threads.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pisarev, Vitaliy
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr perfromance with commitWithin seesm too good to be true. I
x+Handlers#UploadingDatawithIndexHandlers-UsingXSLTtoTransformXMLIndexUpdates
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Eric_Peng
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about how to upload XML by using SolrJ Client Java
Code
Tha
Is price a float/double field?
price:[99.5 TO 100.5] -- price near 100
price:[900 TO 1000]
or
price:[899.5 TO 1000.5]
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: jay67
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Using numeric ranges in Solr
Did you mean to use "||" for the OR operator? A single "|" is not treated as
an operator - it will be treated as a term and sent through normal term
analysis.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shamik Bandopadhyay
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 5
Use the OR operator between the specific clauses.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service-Solutions)
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Multiple Column Condition with Relevance/Rank
Set the default query operator (q.op parameter) to AND, or enclosed the full
phrase in quotes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sohan Kalsariya
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:29 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Exact word match
Hello,
I want to the exact
Add debugQuery=true to your queries and look at the scoring in the "explain"
section. From the intermediate scoring by field, you should be able to do
the math to figure out what boost would be required to rank your exact match
high enough.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
The edismax query parser "bf" parameter gives you an additive boost.
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#bf_.28Boost_Function.2C_additive.29
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Zwer
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:52 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
Without "and", the terms are OR'ed, which is the default query operator.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shamik Bandopadhyay
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:53 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Weird behavior of stopwords in search query
Hi,
eve the default setting! Rather, it should tell you how to
override the default setting.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Weird behavior of stopwords in search query
Hi Sami
y of the Lucene query parser.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: Getting fields from query
On closer inspection this isn't quite what I'm looking for. The
e was ever a Jira for it. A quick search did not find one. Feel free to
file one.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: rashi gandhi
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 1:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: help on edismax_dynamic fields
Hello,
I am using edismax p
Maybe some heap/GC issue from using more of this 20 GB index. Maybe it was
running at the edge and just one more field was too much for the heap.
The "timing" section of the debug query response should shed a little light.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Eric
Could you post the request URL and the XML/JSON Solr response? And the
solrconfig for both the query request handler and the spellcheck component.
Is your spell check component configured for both fields, field1 and field2?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Hakim Benoudjit
Are you sure you want to be faceting on a text field, as opposed to a string
field? I mean, each term (word) from the text will be a separate facet
value.
How many facet values do you typically returning?
How many unique terms occur in the facet field?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
I don't recall seeing anything related to passing the debug/debugQuery
parameters on for inter-node shard queries and then add that to the
aggregated response (if debug/debugQuery was specified.) Sounds worth a
Jira.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: KNitin
Sent: Wedn
the next (unpublished) release of my book (that's
one of them.)
That handler returns all token details, but if you wanted to roll your own,
start there. The handler is:
org.apache.solr.handler.FieldAnalysisRequestHandler
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Software Dev
Se
Just send the queries to Solr in parallel using multiple threads in your
application layer.
Solr can handle multiple, parallel queries as separate, parallel requests,
but does not have a way to bundle multiple queries on a single request.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
The bf parameter adds the value of a function query to the document store.
Your example did not include a bf parameter.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ing. Andrea Vettori
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:26 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Search score
Backslashes are used to escape special characters in queries, but the
backslash must in turn be encoded in the URL as %5C.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: deniz
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Searching with special chars
requires explicitly referring to all documents before applying
the negation.
So,
AND -tag_id:268702
should be:
AND (*:* -tag_id:268702)
Or, maybe you actually wanted this:
first_publish_date:[NOW/DAY-33DAYS TO NOW/DAY-3DAYS] -tag_id:268702
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
not ignore stopwords, so the dismax for "of" will not be empty (although the
clause for some of the fields will not be present since the stop word filter
eliminates them) so that the dismax fails to match anything and since
q.op=AND, the whole query matches nothing.
-- Jack
o "reindex". Can you imagine database
developers being told that they must delete all their existing data and
"start over"?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nutchsolruser
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 11:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Sol
requirements needed for a
System of Record or where strict ACID and heavy real-time updates are
required.
It's up to the individual application project to make all of these
suitability judgments.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Saturday, March 1, 20
As I suggested, you have a couple of field that do not ignore stop words, so
the stop word must be present in at least one of those fields:
(number:of^3.0 | all_code:of^2.0)
The solution would be to remove the "number" and "all_code" fields from qf.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
up to accommodate them."
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr is NoSQL database or not?
Hi;
I said that:
"What are the main differences between ElasticSearch
and
term frequency as well in the function query.
boost=product(tf(name,'co'),10)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Zwer
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Multiple partial match
Hi Guys,
Faced with a problem: make query to S
Or, maybe he is and shouldn't since deleteById is a SolrXML update handler
feature, not a query parser feature.
For example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2657409/deleting-index-from-solr-using-solrj-as-a-client
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Yes, if they are tokenized text fields, but I was assuming that "number" was
a strictly numeric field.
That said, you could have numeric and non-tokenized string fields, but
copyField them to text fields (or a single text field) for purposes of
queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
---
Make sure you're not doing a commit on each individual document add. Commit
every few minutes or every few hundred or few thousand documents is
sufficient. You can set up auto commit in solrconfig.xml.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rallavagu
Sent: Wednesday, Ma
In any case, besides the raw code and the similarity Javadoc, Lucene does
have Javadoc for "file formats":
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_9_0/core/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene49/package-summary.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Sunday,
se case to confirm whether you really need to use
"string" as opposed to "text" field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth S
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Substring and Case In sensitive Search
Hi,
ew minutes" CPU-bound or I/O-bound?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: SolrUser1543
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 2:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Performance of Boolean query with hundreds of OR clauses.
I am using Solr to perform search for finding s
What release of Solr?
Do you have autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true" on the field?
And when you said "But any of these does", did you mean "But NONE of these
does"?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Tuesday, August
For the sake of completeness, please post the parsed query that you get when
you add the debug=true parameter. IOW, how Solr/Lucene actually interprets
the query itself.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:03 AM
To: solr-user
ver decent performance, as long
as the prefix isn't too short (e.g., "cat*"). See PrefixQuery:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_9_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/PrefixQuery.html
ngram filters can also be used, but... that can make the index rather large.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
ended use case clearly - there may be some
better way to try to achieve it.
Use the analysis page of the Solr Admin UI to see the detailed query and
index analysis of your terms. You'll be surprised.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automoti
original query, the
implementation (BooleanQuery) uses the terms generated by the analysis
process, which can break up source terms into multiple terms and generate
extra terms as well. Any MM number or percentage will count the terms output
by analysis, not the source terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
Uhhh... UIMA... and parameter checking... NOT. You're probably missing
something, but there is so much stuff.
I have some examples in my e-book that show various errors you can get for
missing/incorrect parameters for UIMA:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-
erms of how it treats text to be
indexed and how you expect to be able to query that text.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shay Sofer
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 5:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Exact search with special characters
Hi all,
problematic.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Pitsounis
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 7:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: embedded documents
Hello everybody,
I had a requirement to store complicated json documents in solr.
i have modified the
y - you've confused
the discussion here by failing to do so on at least one occasion, and
possibly in this latest response although I can't tell for sure.
5. We'll confirm either any mistakes you've made, recommendations, and
whether there are any bugs.
Fair enough?
-- Jack Kr
rue query parameter and
post the parsed query so that we can see what was really generated for the
query.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 12:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with StopFilterFactory
I don'
Just to confirm, the generated phrase query is generated using the analyzed
terms, so if the stop filter is removing the terms, they won't appear in the
generated query. It will be interesting to see what does get generated.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
That's a completely different concept, I think - the ability to return a
single field value as a structured JSON object in the "writer", rather than
simply "loading" from a nested JSON object and distributing the key values
to normal Solr fields.
-- Jack Krupans
d for whatever degree of "exactness" you require.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shay Sofer
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Exact search with special characters
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I thought that google
lr users is not well highlighted for Solr users. Sorry about that.
In any case, try adding enablePositionIncrements="false", reindex, and see
what happens.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
ng to make Solr more automatic and more
approachable, not an even more complicated "toolkit".
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 9:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: embedded documents
Jack et al - there’s now
And a comparison to Elasticsearch would be helpful, since ES gets a lot of
mileage from their super-easy JSON support. IOW, how much of the ES
"advantage" is eliminated.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 1:59 PM
To:
this attribute:
luceneMatchVersion="4.3"
But... the old behavior is now "deprecated", so it mostly likely will not be
in Solr 5.0.
I'll think about this some more as to whether there might be some workaround
or alternative.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
I agree that it's a bad situation, and wasn't handled well by the Lucene
guys. They may have had good reasons, but they didn't execute a decent plan
for how to migrate existing behavior.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Tuesday, August 26,
or "text" field (which)? If a text field, does it have a
lower case filter, in which case you don't need lower case.
Worst case, you could use a regex query term, but better to avoid that if at
all possible.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nutchsolruser
Sen
u load a range of documents on your chosen
hardware, both a single machine and a small cluster, and measure how much
load it can handle and how it performs. And then scale your cluster based on
that application-specific performance data.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: lalitja
Is the high usage just suddenly happening after a long period of up-time
without it, or is this on a server restart? The latter can happen if you
have a large commit log to replay because you haven't done hard commits.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/URLClassifyProcessor.html
The official doc is... pitiful, but I have doc and examples in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
What exactly are you referring to by the term "external indexer"?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lee Chunki
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 7:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: external indexer for Solr Cloud
Hi,
Is there any way to run external i
5098
That said, maybe you could provide a couple of examples of exactly what you
want to do.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ankit Jain
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Specify Analyzer per field
Hi All,
I would like to use s
Different field TYPES, not different fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Specify Analyzer per field
Hi,
I think he wants to change query analyzer dynamically, where index
But that doesn't let him change or override the analyzer for the field type.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:55 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Specify Analyzer per field
Can't you just use old fashion dyna
My other thought was that maybe he wants to do index updates outside of the
cluster that is handling queries, and then copy in the completed index.
Or... maybe take replicas out of the query rotation while they are updated.
Or... maybe this is yet another X-Y problem!
-- Jack Krupansky
could override that filter. Or, do an application layer that
forces that filter to be added.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: cmd.ares
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 2:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solr result handler??
I have a blacklist save some keywords
is
not a supported scenario at this time. Certainly suggestions for future
enhancement can be made though.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 4:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Scaling to large Number of Collections
we se
You close with two great questions for the community!
We have a similar issue over in Apache Cassandra database land (thousands of
tables).
There is no immediate, easy, great answer. Other than the kinds of
"workarounds" being suggested.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
e
sharded for a few shards or even just a single shard, and to instead focus
the attention on large number of collections rather than heavily-sharded
collections.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.
w you how to define and use custom
analyzers as well."
No, Solr does not have that feature per se - you have to specify a custom
field TYPE to specify the analyzer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ankit Jain
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 2:14 AM
To:
for each tenant's collection(s).
This raises the question: How many of your collections need to be
simultaneously active? Say, in a one-hour period, how many of them will be
updating and serving queries, and what query load per-collection and total
query load do you need to design fo
701 - 800 of 2693 matches
Mail list logo
