I have the following field configured in schema.xml:
Where "text" is the type which came with the Solr distribution. I have
not been able to get this configuration to alter any document scores,
and if I look at the indexes in Luke there is no change in the norms
(compared to an un-boosted equiv
butes_for_.2
2field.22 ?
Otis
--
Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
- Original Message
> From: Ian Smith
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, November 18, 2009 6:40:11 AM
> Subj
easier to control the scoring than say function queries
which would be the query time substitute if the boost is a function of
particular field values.
~ David Smiley
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/
On Nov 18, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> I have
Hi Guys,
I am trying to use Solr Cell to extract body content from documents, and
also to pass along some literal field values. Trouble is, some of the
literal fields contain spaces, colons etc. which cause a "bad request"
exception in the server. However, if I URL encode these fields the
encodi
Sorry guys, the bad request seemed to be caused elsewhere, no need to
URL encode now.
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Smith [mailto:ian.sm...@gossinteractive.com]
Sent: 20 November 2009 15:26
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Cell text extraction
Hi Guys,
I am trying to
Yeah, like I said, I was mistaken about setting field boost in
schema.xml - doesn't mean it's a bad idea though. At any rate, from
your penultimate sentence I reckon at least one of us is still confused
about field boosting, feel free to reply if you think it's me ;)
Ian.
-Original Message--
Hi Chris, thanks for replying!
OK, now I'm going to take the bait ;)
I am talking about field boosting rather than document boosting, ie. I
would like some fields (say eg. title) to be "louder" than others,
across ALL documents. I believe you are at least partially talking
about document boos
Aaaargh! OK, I would like a document with (eg.) a title containing
a term to score higher than one on (eg.) a summary containing the same
term, all other things being "equal". You seem to be arguing against
field boosting in general, and I don't understand why!
May as well let this drop sinc
Hi Guys,
We need to eliminate one of our stored fields from the Solr response to
reduce traffic as it is very bulky and not used externally. I have been
experimenting both with "fl=FIELDNAME" and addField(FIELDNAME) from
SolrJ and have found it is possible to achieve this effect for fixed
fields
OK thanks for the reply, fortunately we have now found an approach which
avoids storing the field. It would be nice to be able to search for
dynamic fields in a way which is consistent with their definition,
although I suppose there probably isn't demand for this.
Regards,
Ian.
-Original Me
Hi all,
I am a new Solr user, and am trying to run an embedded server using the
procedure at:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#EmbeddedSolrServer
Both the constructor and the static factory are deprecated, and if I try
to use the procedure I end up with the following error:
Exception in thread
From: Manepalli, Kalyan [mailto:kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com]
Sent: 24 June 2009 19:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How do I set up an embedded server with version 1.3.0 ?
Hi Ian,
I use the embeddedSolrServer from a Solr Component.
The code for invoking the embeddedSolrSer
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 June 2009 10:41
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How do I set up an embedded server with version 1.3.0 ?
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Ian Smith
wrote:
>
> Can you or someone else possibly help me with a w
13 matches
Mail list logo
