malized. I need it
normalized in order to apply my custom value in the sortValue function in
ScoreDocComparator.
What do you think? What's the best option in that case? Another option?
Thank you in advance,
George
Ok Yonik, thank you.
I've tried to execute the following query: "{!boost b=log(myrank)
defType=dismax}q" and it works great.
Do you know if I can do the same (combine a DisjunctionMaxQuery with a
BoostedQuery) in solrconfig.xml?
George
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Yonik
Todd: Yes, I looked into these arguments before I found the problem I
described in the first email.
Yonik: It's exactly what I was looking for.
George
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:37 PM, George <[EMAIL
Hi,
I've an Oracle DATE column that I want to index with a Solr DateField. The
part of my schema.xml looks like this:
I use DataImportHandler. When I do a search, this field is returned with one
day before. Oracle: 2006-12-10. Solr: 2006-12-09T23:00:00Z
If I index it as a String, it's indexed
trunk version (rev. 785397) and no custom properties
(i.e. onError value is default 'abort') in DataImportHandler.
George
up the exception and logs error and goes back. I shall
> raise an issue
>
> thanks
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:12 PM, George wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Yesterday I found out the following exception trying to index from an
> Oracle
> > Database
ngeField.
Searching for the error I get, I found this source file:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/FacetRange.java
Where in line 180 it has "if (ft instanceof TrieField || ft.isPointField()".
Is it related to my problem? Is the new json facet interface not working
with date ranges?
Regards,
George
Currently, solr grouping (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing)
sorts groups "by the score of the top document within each group". E.g.
[...]
"groups":[{
"groupValue":"81cb63020d0339adb019a924b2a9e0c2",
"doclist":{"numFound":9,"start":0,"maxScore":4.729042,"docs":[
{
My previous subject line was not very scannable. Apologies for the re-post,
I'm just hoping to get more eye-balls and hopefully some insights. Thank
you in advance for your time. See below.
-GS
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:37 PM, George Stathis wrote:
> Currently, solr groupi
Hi,
Is anybody using Solr with Cassandra?
Are there any Gotcha's?
Thanks
--Siju
Thanks a million Nick,
We are currently debating whether we should use cassandra or membase or
hbase with solr.
Do you have anything to contribute as advice to us?
Thanks again :-)
--Siju
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:15 AM, nickdos wrote:
>
> Yes, we are Cassandra. There is nothing much to say r
ase/Cassandra
> as
> an aux store of large data or using Cassandra to store the actual lucene
> index (as in LuCandra)?
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Siju George
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a million Nick,
> >
> > We are currently debating whether we should use c
nt type data
but curious about functionality with bounding box type data (in contrast to
simple point lat/long data).
Thanks,
George
out of reach for
NRT? Is a 9GB index with 7 million records out of reach? How about 3GB
with 3 million records? 3GB with 800K records? This is for 1 min. NRT
setting.
Thanks.
-- George
Here is my customize schema.xml setting:
Btw, "Solr", "solr", "sOlr", etc. works. It's a problem with wild cards.
Thanks in advance.
-- George
those filters work on German text?
Thanks.
-- George
t is, will WordDelimiterFilterFactory work with a German filter? Etc.
It would be nice if folks share their setting (Generic for each language)
and then we can add them to a Solr Wiki.
-- George
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:40
so, how did you
workaround it? That is, is breaking on generic whitespaces (independent of
the analyzer in use) "good enough"?
Thanks.
-- George
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:35 PM
> To: solr
do a bit more basic research in how search engines work.
I found this very readable and accurate site the other day:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/07/30/OnSearchTOC
Regards,
George
On Sep 17, 2008, at 8:39 AM, convoyer wrote:
Hi all.
I am quite new to solr. I am just check
003 server, with 4
Gb RAM and 3 GHZ 2x Xean CPU.
So, if you can share your setup, at least the commit frequency, I would
appreciate it.
What I'm trying to get out of this, is what's the lowest commit frequency
that Solr can handle.
Regards,
-- George
I have a nearly generic out-of-box installation of solr. When I
search on a short text document containing a few hyphenated words, I
get hits on *some* of the words, but not all. I'm quite puzzled as to
why. I've checked that the text is only plain ascii. How can I find
out what's wrong? In th
Which version of Tika do you have? There was a problem introduced somewhere
between Tika 0.6 and Tika 0.7 whereby the TikaConfig method
config.getParsers() was returns an empty parser list due to class loader
scope issues with Solr running under an application server.
There is a fix in the Tika 0
I have a list of files in a database that I am indexing (it is a liferay
database and the file lists are attachments). I'm encountering the following
error
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-709
on one of the PDF documents and this causes indexing to stop (the
TikaEntityProcessor) thro
I modified TikaEntityProcessor to ignore these exceptions.:
If the Tika Entity processor encounters an exception it will stop indexing.
I had to make two fixes to TikaEntityProcessor to work around this problem.
>From the Solr SVN trunk edit the file:
~/src/solr-svn/trunk/solr/contrib/dataimpor
cool I will try that.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Resume-Solr-indexing-CSV-after-exception-tp878801p888605.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ith those
limitations, I'd be happy to help.
Let me know if you're interested.
George Everitt
Applied Relevance LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +1 (727) 641-4660
Fax: +1 (727) 233-0672
On Aug 8, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Jan Miczaika wrote:
Hello,
we are looking for a Lucene/Solr con
olrServer.java:106)
at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.QueryRequest.process (
QueryRequest.java:80)
at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseSolrServer.query(
BaseSolrServer.java:99)
at my.padam.solr.SolrJQueryTest.testQuery(SolrJQueryTest.java:134)
at my.padam.solr.SolrJQueryTest.main (SolrJQueryTest.java:165)
--
Thanks
George L
query field be stored?
It will be nice if http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase is
updated.
--
Thanks
George L
On 9/9/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> George L wrote:
> > I have been trying the MLT Query using EmbeddedSolr and SolrJ clients,
> whic
ities with
> Solr (multi-index falls into that category), they should be
> able to configure their own servlet container, whether it be
> jetty plus, tomcat, resin, etc.
Does this means Solr 1.2 supports MultiSearcher?
-- George
Even if that's not your goal, this might help someone else.
George Everitt
On Nov 7, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Kristen Roth wrote:
So, I think I have things set up correctly in my schema, but it
doesn't
appear that any logic is being applied to my Category_# fields - they
are being p
t use XXX to
crawl your web sites - there's no 'integration' required at all. Can
you believe the temerity? What a poltroon."
Yours in Revolution,
George
lly over the past few months as I feel
my way through Solr and Lucene.
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
The answer to that question, Norberto, would depend on versions.
George: why not just use straight Nutch and forget about Heritrix?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematex
)
Regards,
George
On Dec 11, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Isn't that GROUP BY ColumnX, count(1) type of thing?
I'd think "group by" would be a good label.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: &quo
igure out how to offer it up as a part
of the code base. I'm pretty naive when it comes to FLOSS, so any
authoritative non-condescending hints on how to go about this would be
greatly appreciated.
Regards,
George
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 9:20 PM, solruser2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's say I have a database containing people, groups, and projects
(these
all have different fields). I want to index these different kinds
of objects
with a view to eventually p
s need too.
Thanks.
-- George
lity into Solr? I have my own thoughts, but they are still a
bit primitive, and I'd like to throw it over the transom and see who
bites...
George Everitt
Applied Relevance LLC
Wow, that's spooky.
Thanks for the heads up - looks like a good list to subscribe to as well
George Everitt
Applied Relevance LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +1 (727) 641-4660
Fax: +1 (727) 233-0672
Skype: geverit4
AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
o I change that setting? Do I have to rewrite some part of the
RequestHandler?
Thanks,
George
search, I want
the fq param in solrconfig.xml to look like this:
blah1:blah2
Of course the above code won't work right now, but is there any way to
specify that blah2 is actually a field and not a value?
Thanks,
George
You know, that's ultimately what I have done. My thinking is that doing
field comparisons could be too intensive an operation anyway.
Thanks,
George
On 4/11/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/11/07, George Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using the
We are looking for some recommendations around systematically re-indexing in
Solr an ever growing corpus of documents (tens of millions now, hundreds of
millions in than a year) without taking the currently running index down.
Re-indexing is needed on a periodic bases because:
- New features ar
42 matches
Mail list logo