i think you should check your scheme.xml and solrconfig.xml encoding format =
utf-8。
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-does-not-recognize-language-tp4133711p4134643.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
because if your encoding format doesn't both utf-8, building index will lead
to messy code, of course, you will not get the expected result.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-does-not-recognize-language-tp4133711p4134647.html
Sent from the Solr - User mail
my scheme.xml：
id
name
update docs：
"docs": [
{
"name": "苹果4s",
"type": "手机",
hi,iorixxx, i'm Frankcis, not Victor , are you make the wrong email?
2014-05-05 23:20 GMT+08:00 iorixxx [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n4134713...@n3.nabble.com>:
> Hi Victor,
>
> I don't know mysolr, I assume you are using /update/json, lets add your
&g
thank you, Erick, you're right, the maxScore of document within each group is
more effective than the sum of scores in a group, especially some use-case
just as your assumption(group 1 could have 10M documents all with a score of
.01 and group 2 could have 1 document with a score of 1,000 and group
thank you, Erick, you're good man,
this is the client requirement:
In the forum, there is a lot of discussion of the content under different
subjects, search for a keyword,
which will lead to a result that the word of content or subject match the
query, group these document based on every subject,
my pleasure!
2014-05-06 16:43 GMT+08:00 Victor Pascual [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n413488...@n3.nabble.com>:
> Thank you very much Ahmet for your help.
> It finally worked!
>
> For anyone interested, all your hints where more than useful. I basically
> had two problems:
> - Didn't have my lan
hei, Erick, Sorry to bother you again, i send the client requirement to you
in the solr mail list, but i can't get your reply, i want your advice.
2014-05-06 13:24 GMT+08:00 Frankcis [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n413486...@n3.nabble.com>:
> thank you, Erick, you're good
