Inversion (paris charonne or charonne paris) cannot be scored the same.
2015-12-16 11:08 GMT+01:00 Binoy Dalal :
> What is your exact use case?
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, 13:40 elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your answer.
> >
> > Actually, using a
ok, thanks a lot for your advice.
i'll try that.
2015-12-17 10:05 GMT+01:00 Binoy Dalal :
> For this case of inversion in particular a slop of 1 won't cause any issues
> since such a reverse match will require the slop to be 2
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, 14:20 eli
Hello all,
I am using solr 4.10.1 and I have configured my pf2 pf3 like this
catchall~0^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms^0.2
catchall~0^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms^0.2
my search field (qf) is my catchall field
I'v been trying to change slop in pf2, pf3 for catchall and synonyms (going
from 0, or default v
21 Dec 2015, 14:37 elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am using solr 4.10.1 and I have configured my pf2 pf3 like this
> >
> > catchall~0^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms^0.2
> > catchall~0^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms^0.2
> >
> > my search
res or
> just one record with a lower score and the other with a higher one?
>
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, 18:45 elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I don't think the query is important in this case.
> >
> > After checking out solr's deb
> You can find this formula and a decent explanation for it in the book solr
> in action or online in the lucene docs:
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/core/3_5_0/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, 11:10 elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
>
> >
Hello,
There was a discussion on this thread about exact match
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user%40lucene.apache.org/msg118115.html
they mention an example on this page
https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2016-02-19 18:01 GMT+01:00 Loïc Stéphan :
> Hello,
>
Hello,
I'm using solr 4.10.1. I'd like to index words with ngrams of fix lenght
with a position in the end.
For instance, with fix lenght 3, Amsterdam would be something like:
a0 (two spaces added at beginning)
am1
ams2
mst3
ste4
ter5
erd6
rda7
dam8
am9 (one more space in the end)
The number a
ecific length.
> It should not be too hard to create such filter - you can take a look how
> nagram filter is coded - yours should be simpler than that.
>
> Regards,
> Emir
>
>
> On 08.03.2016 08:52, elisabeth benoit wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm
> Cheers
>
> On 8 March 2016 at 10:08, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your answer Emir,
> >
> > I'll check that out.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Elisabeth
> >
> > 2016-03-08 10:24 GMT+01:00 Emir Arnautovic >:
>
nd of search/autocompletion/relevancy tuning are you trying to
> achieve ?
> Maybe we can help better if we start from the problem :)
>
> Cheers
>
> [1]
>
> http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/exploring-solr-internals-lucene.html
>
> On 9 March 2016 at 15:02, e
ial
> phrase query to affect the scoring.
> Not a good fit for your problem.
>
> More than grams, have you considered using some sort of phonetic matching ?
> Could this help :
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Phonetic+Matching
>
> Cheers
>
>
he query parser tokenisation to build the grams and then
> the query time analysis is applied.
> This according to my remembering,
> I will double check in the code and let you know.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On 10 March 2016 at 11:02, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
>
> > T
esults, you can move ngram logic
> outside of analysis chain - simplest solution is to move it to client. In
> such setup, you should be able to use pf2 and pf3 and see if that produces
> desired result.
>
> Regards,
> Emir
>
>
> On 10.03.2016 13:47, elisabeth benoit wro
Hello all,
I am using Solr 4.10.1. I use edismax, with pf2 to boost documents starting
with. I use a start with token (b) automatically added at index time,
and added in request at query time.
I have a problem at this point.
request is *q=b saint denis rer*
the start with field is name_
Hello,
We're using solr 4.10 and storing all data in a catchall field. It seems to
me that one good reason for using a catchall field is when using scoring
with idf (with idf, a word might not have same score in all fields). We got
rid of idf and are now considering using multiple fields. I rememb
in descriptions, all of which would occur in a catchall.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:39 AM, elisabeth benoit <
> elisaelisael...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We're using solr 4.10 and storing all data in a catc
y, then you could move on to the next
> highest most likely field, maybe product title (short one line
> description), and query voluminous fields like detailed product
> descriptions, specifications, and user comments/reviews only as a last
> resort.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
>
Hello,
I am using solr 4.10.1. I have a field with stopwords
And I use pf2 pf3 on that field with a slop of 0.
If the request is "Gare Saint Lazare", and I have a document "Gare de Saint
Lazare", "de" being a stopword, this document doesn't get the pf3 boost,
because of "de".
I was wondering
t; > try setting your slop = 1 in which case it should match Gare Saint Lazare
> > even with the de in it.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:22 PM elisabeth benoit <
> > elisaelisael...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I
Hello,
I am using Solr 4.10.1 and trying to use DirectSolrSpellChecker and
FileBasedSpellchecker in same request.
I've applied change from patch 135.patch (cf Solr-6271). I've tried running
the command "patch -p1 -i 135.patch --dry-run" but it didn't work, maybe
because the patch was a fix to Sol
This is something I've
> personally wanted for a long time.
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: elisabeth benoit [mailto:elisaelisael...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:37 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
ds in
spellcheck.collateParam.fq.
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2015-04-14 17:05 GMT+02:00 elisabeth benoit :
> Thanks for your answer!
>
> I didn't realize this what not supposed to be done (conjunction of
> DirectSolrSpellChecker and FileBasedSpellChecker). I got this idea in the
> mailing l
Shouldn't you specify a spellcheck.dictionary in your request handler?
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2015-04-17 11:24 GMT+02:00 Derek Poh :
> Hi
>
> I have enabled spellcheck but not getting any suggestions withincorrectly
> spelled keywords.
> I added the spellcheck into the/select request handler.
>
Hello all,
I was wondering if there was a solr solution for a problem I have (and I'm
not the only one I guess)
We use solr as a search engine for addresses. We sometimes have requests
with let's say for instance
street A close to street B City postcode
I was wondering if some kind of join betw
stal code P.
>
> Is what you're wanting "return me all pairs of documents within that
> postal code that have all the terms matching and the polygons enclosing
> those streets plus some distance intersect"?
>
> Seems difficult.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> O
In addition to what was proposed
We use the technic described here
https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch
and it works quite well.
Best regards
Elisabeth
2016-06-15 16:32 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Benedetti :
> In addition to what Erick correctly proposed,
> are you storing norms for your field o
Hello,
I have a core.properties with content
name=indexer
loadOnStartup=false
but the core is loaded on start up (it appears on the admin interface).
I thougth the core would be unloaded on startup. did I miss something?
best regards,
elisabeth
uot; drop-down) that the heavy-duty
> work of opening the core actually executes.
>
> So I think it's working as expected,. But do note
> that this whole area (transient cores, loading on
> startup true/false) is intended for stand-alone
> Solr and is unsupported in SolrCloud.
>
&
Hello,
We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, and it seems that the mm
parameter is not working the same anymore.
In fact, as soon as there is a word not in the index in the query, no
matter what mm value I send, I get no answer as if my query is a pure AND
query.
Does anyone have a cl
oh sorry wrote too fast. had to change the defaultOperator to OR.
Elisabeth
2016-07-27 10:11 GMT+02:00 elisabeth benoit :
>
> Hello,
>
> We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, and it seems that the mm
> parameter is not working the same anymore.
>
> In fact, as so
Hello,
I'd like to know what is the best way to have the equivalent of
tomcat localhost_access_log for solr 5?
Best regards,
Elisabeth
Hello again,
We're planning on using solr 5.5.2 on production, using installation
script install_solr_service.sh.
I was wondering was is the right way to prevent solr 5 from creating a new
log file at every startup (and renaming the actual file mv
"$SOLR_LOGS_DIR/solr_gc.log" "$SOLR_LOGS_DIR/sol
Thanks a lot for your answer.
Best regards,
elisabeth
2016-08-24 16:16 GMT+02:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 8/24/2016 5:44 AM, elisabeth benoit wrote:
> > I'd like to know what is the best way to have the equivalent of tomcat
> > localhost_access_log for solr 5?
>
> I don&#x
Thanks! This is very helpful!
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2016-08-25 17:07 GMT+02:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 8/24/2016 6:01 AM, elisabeth benoit wrote:
> > I was wondering was is the right way to prevent solr 5 from creating a
> new
> > log file at every startup (and renaming
Hello,
We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2. We don't use solr cloud.
We installed the service with installation script and kept the default
configuration, except for a few settings about logs and the gc config (the
same used with solr 4.10.1).
We tested today the performances of solr
Hello,
We are perf testing solr 5.5.2 (with a limit test, i.e. sending as much
queries/sec as possible) and we see the cpu never goes over 20%, and
threads are blocked in org.eclipse.jetty.util.BlockingArrayQueue, as we can
see in solr admin interface thread dumps
qtp706277948-757 (757)
java.ut
Well, we rekicked the machine with puppet, restarted solr and now it seems
ok. dont know what happened.
2016-09-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 elisabeth benoit :
>
> Hello,
>
>
> We are perf testing solr 5.5.2 (with a limit test, i.e. sending as much
> queries/sec as possible) and we see
Hello
After migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, we dont have the same
behaviour with highlighting on edge ngrams fields.
We're using it for an autocomplete component. With Solr 4.10.1, if request
is sol, highlighting on solr is sol<\em>r
with solr 5.5.2, we have solr<\em>.
Same problem as
73]
0
5
1
word
end is set to 1, 2, 3 or 4 depending on edgengrams length
2016-09-22 14:57 GMT+02:00 elisabeth benoit :
>
> Hello
>
> After migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, we dont have the same
> behaviour with highlighting on edge ngrams fields.
>
> We're us
Hello,
I would like to score higher, or even better to sort documents with same
text scores based on norm
for instance, with query "a b d"
document with
a b d
should score higher than (or appear before) document with
a b c d
The problem is my field is multivalued so omitNorms= False is not
Are in place updates available in solr 5.5.2, I find atomic updates in the
doc
https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-5.5.pdf,
which redirects me to the page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents#UpdatingPartsofDocuments-At
gt; Cassandra
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:30 AM, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
> > Are in place updates available in solr 5.5.2, I find atomic updates in
> the
> > doc
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/ref-guide/
> apache-solr-ref-guide-5.5.pdf,
>
Hello,
I am using solr 5.5.2.
I am trying to give a lower score to frequent words in query.
The only way I've found so far is to do like
q=avenue^0.1 de champaubert village suisse 75015 paris
where avenue is a frequent word.
The problem is I'm using edismax, and when I add ^0.1 to avenue, it
Hello,
We are currently using solr 4.2.1. Our index is updated on a daily basis.
After noticing solr query time has increased (two times the initial size)
without any change in index size or in solr configuration, we tried an
optimize on the index but it didn't fix our problem. We checked the garb
something else me might not see?
Thanks again,
Elisabeth
2014-03-31 16:26 GMT+02:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 3/31/2014 6:57 AM, elisabeth benoit wrote:
> > We are currently using solr 4.2.1. Our index is updated on a daily basis.
> > After noticing solr query time has increased (two ti
true.
> If your solr update lifecycle includes frequent deletes, try this out.
>
> This of course does not override working towards finding better
> GCparameters.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Near+Real+Time+Searching
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at
ith Lucene committers:
> > https://twitter.com/DmitryKan/status/399820408444051456
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Dmitry
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:34 AM, elisabeth benoit <
> > elisaelisael...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
Hello,
I'm using solr 4.2.1.
I use a very permissive value for mm, to be able to find results even if
request contains non relevant words.
At the same time, I'd like to be able to do some efficient spellcheking
with solrdirectspellchecker.
So for instance, if user searches for "rue de Chraonne
ok, thanks a lot, I'll check that out.
2014-05-14 14:20 GMT+02:00 Markus Jelsma :
> Elisabeth, i think you are looking for SOLR-3211 that introduced
> spellcheck.collateParam.* to override e.g. dismax settings.
>
> Markus
>
> -Original message-
> From:elisabeth benoit
> Sent:Wed 14-05-2
Hello,
Is it possible, in solr 4.2.1, to split a multivalued field with a json
update as it is possible do to with a csv update?
with csv
/update/csv?f.address.split=true&f.address.separator=%2C&commit=true
with json (using a post)
/update/json
Thanks,
Elisabeth
Thanks for your answer,
best regards,
Elisabeth
2014-06-12 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Rafalovitch :
> There is always UpdateRequestProcessor.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
> On 12/06/2014 7:05 pm, "elisabeth benoit"
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is i
Hello,
I am using solr 4.2.1. I have the following use case.
I should find results inside bbox OR if there is none, first result outside
bbox within a 1000 km distance. I was wondering what is the best way to
proceed.
I was considering doing a geofilt search from the center of my bounding box
an
urn the fallback.
>
> Please let me know how this goes.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:12 AM, elisabeth benoit <
> elisaelisael...@gmail.com
> >
yutz
Envoyé de mon iPhoneippj
Le 26 janv. 2014 à 06:13, Shalin Shekhar Mangar a
écrit :
> There is no timestamp versioning as such in Solr but there is a new
> document based versioning which will allow you to specify your own
> (externally assigned) versions.
>
> See the "Document Centric Ve
Hello,
We are looking for a solr consultant to help us with our devs using solr.
We've been working on this for a little while, and we feel we need an
expert point of view on what we're doing, who could give us insights about
our solr conf, performance issues, error handling issues (big thing). W
on this mailing list should be sure
> that they are "registered" on that support wiki. Hey, it's free! And be
> sure to keep your listing up to date, including regional availability and
> any specialties.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: el
Hello,
I am using Solr 4..2.1 and I've tried to use a per field similarity, as
described in
https://apache.googlesource.com/lucene-solr/+/c5bb5cd921e1ce65e18eceb55e738f40591214f0/solr/core/src/test-files/solr/collection1/conf/schema-sim.xml
so in my schema I have
and a custom similarity in f
I've read somewhere that we do have to reindex when changing similarity
class. Is that right?
Thanks again,
Elisabeth
Thanks for the information!
I've been struggling with that debug output. Any other way to know for sure
my similarity class is being used?
Thanks again,
Elisabeth
2014-10-09 13:03 GMT+02:00 Markus Jelsma :
> Hi - it should work, not seeing your implemenation in the debug output is
> a known iss
ok thanks.
I think something is not working here (I'm quite sure my similarity class
is not beeing used because when I use
SchemaSimilarityFactory and a custom fieldtype similarity definition with
NoTFSimilarity, I don't get the same scoring as when I use NoTFSimilarity
as global similarity; but
thanks a lot for your answers!
2014-10-14 6:10 GMT+02:00 Jack Krupansky :
> To correct myself, the selected Similarity class can have a computeNorm
> method that calculates the "norm" value that will be stored in the index
> when the document is indexed, so changing the Similarity class will requ
Hello all,
We are using solr 4.2.1 (but planning to switch to solr 4.10 very soon).
We are trying to do approximative search using ~ operator.
We use catchall_light field without stemming (to do not mix fuzzy and
stemming)
We send a request to solr using fuzzy operator on non "frequent" words
Hello all,
Is there a parameter in solr 4.10.1 api allowing user to fix prefix length
in fuzzy search.
Best regards,
Elisabeth
t;
> -Original Message- From: elisabeth benoit
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:07 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: prefix length in fuzzy search solr 4.10.1
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Is there a parameter in solr 4.10.1 api allowing user to fix pref
Hello,
I am using solr 4.2.1 and I have a autocomplete_edge type defined in
schema.xml
When I have a request with more then one word, for instance "rue de la", my
request doesn't match with my autocomplete_edge field unless I use
ltfield:term2
> This happens long before the terms get to the analysis chain
> for the field.
>
> So your only options are to either quote the string or
> escape the spaces.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:24 AM, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
> >
like
> OR "original query"
> and optionally boost it high. But I'd start with the autoGenerate bits.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:37 AM, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer.
> >
> > So I guess if
s right along, but adding
> debug=query will show the parsed query.
>
> I really question though, your apparent combination of
> autoGeneratePhraseQuery what looks like an ngram field.
> I'm not at all sure how those would interact...
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Fri
Hello,
I have a query
/select?&q=49&q.alt=*:*&fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WAY_ANALYZED:rue
charonne AND (TOWN_ANALYZED:paris OR
DEPARTMENT_ANALYZED:paris)&rows=50&fl=*,score&
returning no answer because of the q=49 parameter.
The query
/select?&q=&q.alt=*:*&fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WA
ok, I guess I found how
q=49 OR *
2011/9/8 elisabeth benoit
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a query
>
> /select?&q=49&q.alt=*:*&fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WAY_ANALYZED:rue
> charonne AND (TOWN_ANALYZED:paris OR
> DEPARTMENT_ANALYZED:paris)&rows=50&fl=*,sco
Hello,
Iif I have a request with
fq=NAME_ANALYZED:tour eiffel
and I have different answers like
Restaurant la tour Eiffel
Hotel la tour Eiffel
Tour Eiffel
...
Is there a way to get answers with NAME_ANALYZED beginning with "tour
Eiffel" first?
Thanks,
Elisabeth
Hello,
Does anynone know if it is possible to configure Solr to do by default fuzzy
search on every query word? All examples I've seen are ponctual (ie the
tilde operator follows one specific word in q parameter).
Best regards,
Elisabeth
his is the only solution I can think of.
Any comment would be appreciated,
Thanks,
Elisabeth
2011/9/16 elisabeth benoit
>
> Hello,
>
> Iif I have a request with
>
> fq=NAME_ANALYZED:tour eiffel
>
> and I have different answers like
>
> Restaurant la tour Eiffel
>
Thanks a lot for your advice.
What really matters to me is that answers with NAME_ANALYZED=Tour Eiffel
appear first. Then, if "Tour Eiffel Tower By Helicopter" appears before or
after "Hotel la tour Eiffel" doesn't really matter.
Since I send fq=NAME_ANALYZED:tour eiffel, I am sure NAME_ANALYZED
Hello,
I'd like to be able to know programmaticaly what value mm was set to for one
request (to avoid having to parse the query, identify stopwords, calculate
mm based on solrconfig.xml). Is there a way to get mm value in solr
response?
Thanks,
Elisabeth
t's of course possible to calculate mm in my own code, but this would
necessitate to be synchronize with mm default value in solrconfig.xml + with
stopwords.txt + identifying all stopwords in request.
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2011/10/5 Shawn Heisey
> On 10/5/2011 1:01 AM, elisabet
I think you could define star wars and starwars as synonyms in
synonyms.txt...
maybe not generic enough?
2011/10/5 Mike Mander
> Isn't this more a problem of the query string?
>
> Let's assume i have a game name like "Nintentdo 3DS - 'Star Wars - Clone
> Wars'".
> Can i copy that name to a fiel
I would use that mm value to decrease it in case user's request would get no
answer.
I deal with requests potentially containing a lot of parasite words, and I
want to progammaticaly lower mm in a second try request if necessary. But I
don't want to decrease it too much to avoid getting too many i
I think you can use pf2 and pf3 in your requestHandler.
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2011/10/16 Vijay Ramachandran
> Hello. I have an application where I try to match longer queries
> (sentences)
> to short documents (search phrases). Typically, the documents are 3-5 terms
> in length. I am facing a
Hello,
I've just installed Solr 4.0, and I am getting an error when indexing.
*GRAVE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.lucene.util.CodecUtil.writeHeader(Lorg/apache/lucene/store/DataOutput;Ljava/lang/String;I)Lorg/apache/lucene/store/DataOutput;
at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.save(F
s war archives in this directory, and it may
> have kept a 3.4 solr war deployed here.
>
> 2011/11/9 elisabeth benoit
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've just installed Solr 4.0, and I am getting an error when indexing.
> >
> > *GRAVE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodErro
Hello,
I'm trying to use NGramFilterFactory for spell correction. I have three
questions.
1) I use an edismax request handler. In this case, what is the relation
between my ngrams and my default operator (q.op), if there is any?
2) Is there a way to control the proximity and percentage of ngrams
Hello,
I'd like to know if the Levensthein distance algorithm used by Solr 4.0
DirectSpellChecker (working quite well I must say) is considering an
inversion as distance = 1 or distance = 2?
For instance, if I write Monteruil and I meant Montreuil, is the distance 1
or 2?
Thanks,
Elisabeth
oile" given for 'jolie").
Best,
Elisabeth
one error the DirectSpellChecker couldn't make the right suggestion for is
"joile" for "jolie", I guess because transposition is 2, and because the
word is just five letters long so the inversion
2011/11/29 Robert Mui
Hello,
If anybody can help, I'd like to confirm a few things about Solr's caches
configuration.
If I want to calculate cache size in memory relativly to cache size in
solrconfig.xml
For Document cache
size in memory = size in solrconfig.xml * average size of all fields
defined in fl parameter
Thanks a lot for these answers!
Elisabeth
2011/12/4 Erick Erickson
> See below:
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:57 AM, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > If anybody can help, I'd like to confirm a few things about Solr's caches
> > confi
Hello,
I'm using Solr 3.4, and I'm having a problem with a request returning
different results if I have or not a space after a coma.
The request "name, number rue taine paris" returns results with 4 words out
of 5 matching ("name", "number", "rue", "paris")
The request "name,number rue taine pa
same problem with Solr 4.0
2011/12/8 elisabeth benoit
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Solr 3.4, and I'm having a problem with a request returning
> different results if I have or not a space after a coma.
>
> The request "name, number rue taine paris" retu
Thanks for the answer.
yes in fact when I look at debugQuery output, I notice that name and number
are never treated as single entries.
I have
(((text:name text:number)) (text:ru) (text:tain) (text:paris)))
so name and number are in same parenthesis, but not exactlly treated as a
phrase, as far
Hello,
I have a catchall field, and I need to do some request in all fields of
that catchall field, minus one. To avoid duplicating my index, I'd like to
know if there is a way to use my catch field while excluding that one field.
Thanks,
Elisabeth
then use one or the other
> depending, but as you say that would increase the size of your
> index...
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:47 AM, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a catchall field, and I need to do some request in all
Hello,
I'd like to know if there is some specific way, in Solr 3.6.1, to have
something like an homogeneous dispersion of documents in a bbox.
My use case is I a have a request returning let's say 1000 documents in a
bbox (they all have the same solr score), and I want only 50 documents, but
not
Hi all,
I'm using solr 3.4 with a catchall field and an edismaw request handler.
I'd like to score higher answers matching with words not contained in one
of the fields copied into my catchall field.
So my catchallfield is called catchall. It contains, let's say, fields
NAME, CATEGORY, TOWN, WAY
Hello,
I've read several post on this issue, but can't find a real solution to my
multi-words synonyms matching problem.
I have in my synonyms.txt an entry like
mairie, hotel de ville
and my index time analyzer is configured as followed for synonyms.
The problem I have is that now "mairie" m
de ville => mairie
> might work for you.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:41 AM, elisabeth benoit
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've read several post on this issue, but can't find a real solution to
> my
> > multi-words sy
index time. So
> "mairie" and "hotel de ville" searchable on document.
>
> However, still white space tokenizer splits at query time will be a
> problem as described by Markus.
>
> --Jeevanandam
>
> On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:30 PM, elisabeth benoit wrote:
&
the one with the line
.
Anyone as a clue what is different between q analysis behaviour and fq
analysis behaviour?
Thanks a lot
Elisabeth
2012/4/12 elisabeth benoit
> oh, that's right.
>
> thanks a lot,
> Elisabeth
>
>
> 2012/4/11 Jeevanandam Madanagopal
>
>>
q="hotel de ville"&fq=price:[100 To *]&fq=roomType:"King size Bed" ===>
> returns 40 documents from super set of 100 documents
>
>
> hope this helps!
>
> - Jeevanandam
>
>
>
> On 24-04-2012 3:08 pm, elisabeth benoit wrote:
>
>&
that section like:
> "parsed_filter_queries"
>
> My other question is "are you absolutely sure that your
> CATEGORY_ANALYZED field has the correct content?". How does it
> get populated?
>
> Nothing jumps out at me here
>
> Best
> Erick
>
&g
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
