Hey,
Firstly I would like to thank you all for creating such a great
searching platform. What I was wondering is whether it is possible to:
1. Have the spell checker take into account multiple words. For example
if I search for "Sigourney Wever" it doesn't flag as a spelling issue as
'we
nSolrSpellChecker" which theoretically could be enhanced to do exactly
what you want. That is, you could (theoretically) create separate dictionaries for each of
the fields you're searching and let the CSSC combine the results& generate collations,
etc.
James Dyer
E-Commer
vide any
pointers in what exactly would be required that would really help.
Thanks again for your time,
David
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: David Radunz [mailto:da...@boxen.net]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:42 PM
To: so
On 19/01/2012 12:21 AM, O. Klein wrote:
Dyer, James wrote
David,
The spellchecker normally won't give suggestions for any term in your
index. So even if "wever" is misspelled in context, if it exists in the
index the spell checker will not try correcting it. There are 3
workarounds:
1. Use th
Hey,
Every time I send a reply to the list I get a failure for
new...@zju.edu.cn. Should I just ignore this? I am unsure if the message
has been delivered...
Cheers,
David
+series_name:"sigorney+wever"^50&spellcheck.q=sigorney+wever&fq=store_id:"1"&rows=5
Cheers,
David
On 22/01/2012 2:03 AM, David Radunz wrote:
James,
Thanks again for your lengthy and informative response. I updated
from SVN trunk again today and was successf
o whats
entered surrounding the term.
Example:
"Sigourney Wever" would never appear in a document ever.
"Sigourney Weaver" however has many 'hits' in exactly that order of
words.
So there needs to be a way to boost suggestions based on adjacency...
M
Hey,
I am trying to send this again as 'plain-text' to see if it
delivers ok this time. All of the previous messages I sent should be below..
Cheers,
David
On 22/01/2012 11:42 PM, David Radunz wrote:
Hey James,
I have played around a bit more with the settings and trie
appens when you just send them as "plain text"?
Best
Erick
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:24 AM, David Radunz wrote:
Hey,
Every time I send a reply to the list I get a failure for
new...@zju.edu.cn. Should I just ignore this? I am unsure if the message has
been delivered...
Cheers,
David
ur version that *does* apply
cleanly?
Best
Erick
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:56 AM, David Radunz wrote:
James,
I worked out that I actually needed to 'apply' patch SOLR-2585, whoops.
So I have done that now and it seems to return 'correctlySpelled=true' for
'Sigorne
atch. In your
comments please identify what code line you're working on (4.x? 3.x?).
And when you upload, down near the bottom of the dialog box there'll be
a radio button about "grant ASF license" which is fairly important to
click for legal reasons....
Thanks
Erick
On Sun, Jan
Hey,
Shouldn't you be asking this question to the Magento people? You
have an Enterprise edition, so you have paid for their support.
Cheers,
David
On 25/01/2012 2:57 PM, vishal_asc wrote:
I am integrating solr 3.5 with jetty in magento EE 1.11.
I have followed all the necessary steps,
ement in magento ?
I followed this site:
http://www.summasolutions.net/blogposts/magento-apache-solr-set
Please let me know if you have some other info also.
Best Regards,
Vishal Porwal
From: David Radunz [via Lucene]
[mailto:ml-node+s472066n3686805...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Janua
Hey,
Sounds like what you need to setup is "Multiple Cores"
configuration. At first I confused this with "Multi Core CPU", but
that's not what it's about. Basically it's a way to run multiple 'solr'
cores/indexes/configurations from a single Solr instance (which will
scale better as the r
Hey,
I really recommend you contact Magento pre-sales to find out why
THEIR stuff doesn't work. The information you have provided is specific
to magento... You can't expect people on a Solr mailing list to help you
with a Magento problem. I guarantee you the issue is probably something
Ma
Hey Guys,
I have really been enjoying Solr and I can't really blame the
slowness on solr as this is a pretty insane query. However, I am a
little curious why a repeated query moments later also suffers from the
same load time? Anyway, the queries are:
// 1st Query
INFO: [] webapp=/solr
Hey,
Sorry for the delay, I had to enable larger head buffers in jetty
to do this as a GET query (LOL). Anyway, I have put the results on
pastebin to try and make it more presenable, though it's mostly failed.
1st Query: http://pastebin.com/uSGtQjA3 (query with a freshly started
solr)
Hey Gnanam,
1. If I understand correctly you just need to perform one query. Like so
(translated to propper syntax of course):
("SQL Server" OR SQL) OR ("Visual Basic" OR VB.NET) OR (Java AND
JavaScript)
2. Every query you perform with Solr returns the 'results' count, if you
ONLY want the r
Hey,
I think you might be over-thinking this. Tweets are structured. You
have the content (tweet), the user who tweeted it and various other meta
data. So your 'document', might look like this:
ABCD1234
I bought some apples
JohnnyBoy
To get this structure, you can use any programming
Hey,
I have been having some problems getting good search results when
using weighting against many fields with multi-values. After quite a bit
of testing it seems to me that the problem is (at least as far as my
query is concerned) is that the only one weighting is taken into account
per
Hey,
Please disregard this, I worked out what the actual problem was. I
am going to post another query with something else I discovered.
Thanks :)
David
On 22/08/2012 7:24 PM, David Radunz wrote:
Hey,
I have been having some problems getting good search results when
using
21 matches
Mail list logo
