Hi,
I want to search multiple fields by default (which is no supported by
StandardRequestHandler), but I also want to be able to use Lucene's
boolean syntax (AND/OR/NOT). This doesn't seem to be supported by
DisMaxRequestHandler. I will need to copy or extend StandardRequestHandler
and modify
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 09:47, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> for the record, using the Lucene boolean options "+" and "-" do work in
> the "q" expression for the dismax handler ... for that matter, the
> boolean keywords AND, OR, and NOT work as well
The only case that doesn't seem to work (and th
On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:46, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Use the minimum match spec for a flexible version of all-terms
> matching.
I think this is too difficult and unpredictable. I also don't know how I
should justify a setting like "75%", just because it maybe works fine for
some examples
On Thursday 02 August 2007 20:18, Walter Underwood wrote:
> I agree about the fussiness and mystery of good values for minimum
> match, but the requestor wanted 100% all the time. That is easy.
But I want it only by default, with an easy way to go back to OR for parts
of the query, e.g. doing a
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 12:00, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Basically I see two options: stemming and the usage of synonyms. Are
> there others?
A large list of German words and their forms is available from a Windows
software called Morphy
(http://www.wolfganglezius.de/doku.php?id=public:cl:mo
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 12:03, Maximilian Hütter wrote:
> the content of one document is completely contained in another,
> but search for a special word I only get one document as result.
> I am absolutely sure it is contained in the other document, but I will
> only get the "parent" doc if I
On Donnerstag, 15. November 2007, Paul21 wrote:
> I never did install Tomcat. Maybe that's the problem?
Are you sure you have installed the JDK, not just the JRE?
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
On Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2007, s d wrote:
> Is there a way to retrieve the "analyzed tokens" (e.g. the stemmed
> values) of a field from the SOLR index ?
You could have a look at how Luke implements its "Reconstruct & Edit"
feature. Or you could just re-analyze your text, using an analyzer
direc
On Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008, Alexey Shakov wrote:
> Index-searching works, if i type complete word (such as "übersicht").
> But there are no hits, if i use wildcards (such as "über*")
> Searching with wildcards and without umlauts works as well.
Maybe this describes your problem on the Lucene le
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 21:51, Bill Tantzen wrote:
> However, when I search with 'q=ethics' in solr, I get almost 10,000
> matches. With my client, I get 0.
If you don't specify a field, your client will use this code:
Query query = new TermQuery( new Term("", "ethics") );
This is legal, but y
On Thursday 31 May 2007 09:58, Thierry Collogne wrote:
> Is there someone who can explain to me what the dependencies are with
> the above jar files? Are perhaps offer another solution?
You need to find the right version of those files (probably newer than the
ones in JBoss?) and place them in W
11 matches
Mail list logo
