do NOT want to stem plurals for a particular field, or words

I have a field where there are items that are plurals, and used as very specific locators, so i do a solr search type:articles, and it translates it into : type:article, then into type:articl... is tehre a way to stop it from doing this on either the field "type" or on a list of words "articles, n

Facet vs searching, field types,

hello, my documents have a field called member_of, this field holds a list, so it will look like this: member_of: fred bob mike journals wsjournals jen steve if 'member_of' is a 'string' and i search: goats AND member_of(fred bob journals) i get the right results, however, the faceting doesnt wo

Re: Facet vs searching, field types,

DHast wrote: > > hello, > my documents have a field called member_of, > this field holds a list, so it will look like this: > member_of: fred bob mike journals wsjournals jen steve > if 'member_of' is a 'string' and i search: > goats AND member_of(fre

Re: Facet vs searching, field types,

DHast wrote: > > > > DHast wrote: >> >> hello, >> my documents have a field called member_of, >> this field holds a list, so it will look like this: >> member_of: fred bob mike journals wsjournals jen steve >> if 'member_of' i

copyfield at search time?

is it possible to do somehting like this: Now im wondering how to do something like this: if so, i dont seem to be making progress thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/copyfield-at-search-time--tp25491979p25491979.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing l

solr isnt using default field correctly

hi, if i do a search: text:"law order"~40 i get this: text:"law order"~40 text:"law order"~40 PhraseQuery(text:"law order"~40) text:"law order"~40 OldLuceneQParser However if i do: "law order"~40 i get this: "law order"~40 "law order"~40 text:law order text:law order OldLuceneQParser my Sche

Re: solr isnt using default field correctly

well it seems what is happening is solr is not being consistent, DHast wrote: > > hi, > if i do a search: text:"law order"~40 > i get this: > > text:"law order"~40 > text:"law order"~40 > PhraseQuery(text:"law order"~40) >

Re: solr isnt using default field correctly

parses to a PhraseQuery. I have trouble believing even Solr 1.3 > behaved like you reported, something seems fishy. > > Erik > > On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:02 AM, DHast wrote: > >> >> well it seems what is happening is solr is not being consistent, >> &g

want to features of a 'text' field with the non stemming of a 'string' field

when i have my fieldname: text set as a text field, advanced search queries work very well, but when i have it set as a string it seems to ignore them, like proximity searching and so on. example: text as string: text:"law order"~33 text:"law order"~33 text:law order text:law order text as text:

Re: want to features of a 'text' field with the non stemming of a 'string' field

009, at 6:37 AM, DHast wrote: > >> >> when i have my fieldname: text set as a text field, advanced search >> queries >> work very well, but when i have it set as a string it seems to >> ignore them, >> like proximity searching and so on. >> exampl

Re: want to features of a 'text' field with the non stemming of a 'string' field

ok, used the built in fieldtype text_ws that seems to go well DHast wrote: > > i have looked, and seem to be running into a dead end every time i try it, > but again it may be because of the caching and me not realizing it was > doing it till my hair was half pulled. > > i do

define index at search time

is there a way i can actually tell solr which index i want it to search against with the query? I know it will cost a bit on performance, but it would be helpful i have many indexes and it would be nice to determine which one should be used by the user. thanks -- View this message in context: ht

Re: define index at search time

Singh wrote: > > Are you talking about multiple cores? > > Cheers > Avlesh > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:15 PM, DHast > wrote: > >> >> is there a way i can actually tell solr which index i want it to search >> against with the query? I know it will

Re: define index at search time

well after looking at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin perhaps multiple cores is what i want, DHast wrote: > > No, I am talking about having multiple indexes, i want to send the index > name to the searcher so it will search that index, rather than use the one > defined i

Slow Phrase Queries

Hello, I have recently installed Solr as an alternative to our home made lucene search servers, and while in most respects the performance is better, i notice that phrase searches are incredibly slow compared to normal lucene, primarily when using facets example: "City of New York, Matter of" tak

Re: Slow Phrase Queries

ah, it turns out it was one of my 6 facets, the author. in the data pool tehre are over 1.9 million documents, and about 800,000 authors, removing that facet worked since the field was untokenizd and slow considering how many values tehre were. Solr is definitely faster, and as fast and or faste

Re: Slow Phrase Queries

little over 22 GB's Lance Norskog-2 wrote: > > Are you saying that faceting is faster on a tokenized field? Is this true? > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:02 PM, DHast > wrote: > ... > , removing >> that facet worked since the field was untokenizd and