ionary isn't well
> written for hunspell, but I tried with two different dictionaries, and I
> had the same problem.
>
> I also tried with an english dictionary, and ... it works !
>
> So I think that my french dictionary is wrong for hunspell, but I
> don't know why ...
>
> Can you help me ?
>
--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl
dex (no data yet) and two fields
> using Hunspell (pl_PL) I had to increase heap size to over 2GB for solr to
> start at all..
>
> Stempel using the very same dictionary works fine with 128M..
>
> --
> Maciej Lisiewski
>
--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl
ustom /org.apache.lucene.store.Directory ///supported in Solr? I
> want to
> > try infinispan.
> > //
>
--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl
>
>
> [X] ASF Mirrors (linked in our release announcements or via the Lucene
> website)
>
> [X] Maven repository (whether you use Maven, Ant+Ivy, Buildr, etc.)
>
> [] I/we build them from source via an SVN/Git checkout.
>
> [] Other (someone in your company mirrors them internally or via a
> downst
Hi Paul,
Yes the comment does look very wrong. I'll open a JIRA issue and include a
fix.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> I don't want to join yet another mailing list or register for JIRA,
> but I just noticed that the Javadocs for
> SolrInputDocument.addField(String nam
Hi,
What analyzers/filters have you configured for the field that you are
searching? One could be causing the various versions of "ilike" to be
indexed the same way.
Thanks
Chris
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Vannia Rajan wrote:
> Hi,*
>
> *I need some help to clarify how solr indexes docu
catenateWords="1" configuration. When I change this to 0 only i and like
are created, hence ilike no longer matches i-like.
Hope that fixes your problem.
Thanks,
Chris
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Vannia Rajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Chris Ma
Hi Yatir,
The FieldAnalysisRequestHandler has the same behavior as the analysis tool.
It will show you the list of tokens that are created after each of the
filters have been applied. It can be used through normal HTTP requests, or
you can use SolrJ's support.
Thanks,
Chris
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009
his goal?
> Thanks in advance.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/UpdateRequestProcessor-to-avoid-documents-of-being-indexed-tp26725534p26725534.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| T: +31-(0)6-14344438 |
www.jteam.nl
dealWithSolrDocFields(cmd.getSolrInputDocument()) ;
>if (next != null && addDocToIndex) {
>next.processAdd(cmd);
>} else {
> LOG.debug("Doc skipped!") ;
> }
>}
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Chris Male wro
Hello,
I have a lucene CustomScoreQuery which I am wanting to execute with a lucene
Filter. However the getDocListAndSet API provided by the SolrIndexSearcher
doesn't seem to allow Filters to be used along with Queries. Instead it
seems that the Filters must be first converted to a DocSet. Inte
11 matches
Mail list logo
