multicore for 20k users?

2009-05-17 Thread Chris Cornell
Trying to create a search solution for about 20k users at a company. Each person's documents are private and different (some overlap... it would be nice to not have to store/index copies). Is multicore something that would work or should we auto-insert a facet into each query generated by the pers

Re: multicore for 20k users?

2009-05-17 Thread Chris Cornell
e "user:ralph") then it couldn't have date-added based search. Unless a field was added like date-added-by-ralph, date-added-by-sally (ugh!). Or maybe "diskspace is cheap" and we just should strive for simplicity? Thanks, Chris > > > > On May 17, 2009, at 5:5

Re: multicore for 20k users?

2009-05-17 Thread Chris Cornell
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Chris, > > Yes, disk space is cheap, and with so little overlap you won't gain much by > putting everything in a single index.  Plus, when each user has a separate > index, it's easy to to split users and distribute over multiple machi

Re: multicore for 20k users?

2009-05-18 Thread Chris Cornell
n, maybe 100 at once? No idea, really. Thankyou, Chris > > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Chris Cornell wrote: >> Trying to create a search solution for about 20k users at a company. >> Each person's documents are private and different (some overlap... it >> wou