Hello Solr Community!
I am implementing a data connection to Solr through the Data Import Handler
and non-multivalued fields are working correctly, but multivalued fields
are not getting indexed properly.
I am new to DataImportHandler, but from what I could find, the entity is
the way to go for m
') as raw_tag, site.*
from site
left outer join
(freetags inner join freetagged_objects)
on (freetags.id = freetagged_objects.tag_id
and site.siteId = freetagged_objects.object_id)
group by site.siteId
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Briggs Thompson
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at
searchable.
> However, since your schema.xml has a "raw_tag" field whose "stored"
> attribute is set to false, you may not be able to see those fields.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Briggs Thompson <
> w.briggs.thomp...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
&
background about the data: it is extremely variable. Some documents
contain only 2 or 3 sentences, and some are 20 page extracted PDFs. There
would probably only be about 100-150 unique fields.
Any input is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Briggs Thompson
Hello all,
Is there a good way to get the hit count of a search?
Example query:
textField:solr AND documentId:1000
Say document with Id = 1000 has "solr" 13 times in the document. Any way to
extract that number [13] in the response? I know we can return the score
which is loosely related to hit
Yes indeed, that is what I was missing. Thanks Ahmet!
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
> > Is there a good way to get the hit count of a search?
> >
> > Example query:
> > textField:solr AND documentId:1000
> >
> > Say document with Id = 1000 has "solr" 13 times in the
> >
the field is defined assuming the query is
correct.
Briggs Thompson
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Christopher Cato <
christopher.c...@minimedia.se> wrote:
> Hi, I'm running Solr 3.2 with edismax under Tomcat 6 via Drupal.
>
> I'm having some problems writing a query t
the desired search logic is, but it probably isn't. Check
out the documentation on each of the tokenizers and filter factories in your
"text" field type and see what you need and what you don't to satisfy your
use cases.
Hope that helps,
Briggs Thompson
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:
individual
document types - all in the same core.
Briggs Thompson
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:22 AM, pravesh wrote:
> >a single core is an index with same schema , is this wat core really is ?
>
> YES. A single core is a independent index with its own unique schema. You
> go with
ra/browse/SOLR-3591>
>
> As for your specific issue, not sure, but the error should at least also
> show in the admin view.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2012, at 18:59 , Briggs Thompson wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just grabbed the latest
Also, I forgot to include this before, but there is a client side error
which is a failed 404 request to the below URL.
http://localhost:8983/solr/null/admin/system?wt=json
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Briggs Thompson wrote:
> Thanks Erik. If anyone else has any ideas about
;
> i use an older solr-trunk version from february/march, it works. with
> newer versions from trunk i get the same error: "This interface
> requires that you activate the admin request handlers..."
>
> regards
> vadim
>
>
>
> 2012/7/3 Briggs Thompson :
Thanks in advance,
Briggs Thompson
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Briggs Thompson <
w.briggs.thomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am using 4.0 Alpha and running into an issue with indexing using
> HttpSolrServer (SolrJ).
>
> Relevant java code:
> Http
Yury,
Thank you so much! That was it. Man, I spent a good long while trouble
shooting this. Probably would have spent quite a bit more time. I
appreciate your help!!
-Briggs
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Yury Kats wrote:
> On 7/18/2012 7:11 PM, Briggs Thompson wrote:
> > I have
, Mark Miller wrote:
> we really need to resolve that issue soon...
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Briggs Thompson wrote:
>
> > Yury,
> >
> > Thank you so much! That was it. Man, I spent a good long while trouble
> > shooting this. Probably would
Thanks Mark!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3649
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Briggs Thompson <
> w.briggs.thomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is unrelated for the most part, but the javab
Hello all,
I am running 4.0 alpha and have encountered something I am unable to
explain. I am indexing content to a master server, and the data is
replicating to a slave. The odd part is that when searching through the UI,
no documents show up on master with a standard *:* query. All cache types
a
, do you see that the searcher has all the segments
> that you see in the filesystem?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Briggs Thompson <
> w.briggs.thomp...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am running 4.0 alpha and have encount
when this
problem occurs, though.
This exception is causing the entire application to hang - which is
surprising considering all SolrJ logic is wrapped with try/catches. Has
anyone found out more information regarding the possible keep alive bug?
Any insight is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Briggs
Also note there were no exceptions in the actual Solr log, only on the
SolrJ side.
Thanks,
Briggs
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Briggs Thompson <
w.briggs.thomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have also just ran into this a few times over the weekend in a newly
> deployed system. We
I was looking for something in the solrconfig and
online but didn't find anything. I didn't look for very long so will check
it out again.
Some very good suggestions here. I appreciate everyones feedback. I will
follow up after some experimentation.
Thanks,
Briggs Thompson
On Tue,
There are other updates that happen on the server that do not fail, so the
answer to your question is yes.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Sami Siren wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Briggs Thompson
> wrote:
> > *Sami*
> > The client IS
> > instantiated onl
this correct?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sami Siren wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Briggs Thompson
> wrote:
> > There are other updates that happen on the server that do not fail, so
> the
> > answer to your question is yes.
>
> The other updates are
t; On 10/9/2012 3:02 PM, Briggs Thompson wrote:
>
>> *Otis* - jstack is a great suggestion, thanks! The problem didn't happen
>>
>> this morning but next time it does I will certainly get the dump to see
>> exactly where the app is swimming around. I haven't used
&g
24 matches
Mail list logo
