o a search where if there is no value set
for common_names, I would not want that record included in the search
result.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Is this possible to do? If so, how?
On 7/25/11, Brian Lamb wrote:
> Yes and that's causing some problems in my application. Is there a way to
> truncate the 7th decimal place in regards to sorting by the score?
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>
urned with a higher score than RECORD
1 even though RECORD 1 matches "Fred" exactly? And how should I do
this differently so that I am getting the results I am expecting?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
ECORD 3 shows as having the same
score. So what more can I do to push RECORD 1 up to the top. Ideally, I'd
like all three records returned with RECORD 1 being the first listing.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Emmanuel Espina
wrote:
> That is caused by the size of
That's a clever idea. I'll put something together and see how it turns out.
Thanks for the tip.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : With your solution, RECORD 1 does appear at the top but I think thats
> just
> : blind luck more than anything else because RECORD 3 shows
I will go with
q=+myname:Frank myname_str:"Frank"^100
Thanks for the help everyone!
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : With your solution, RECORD 1 does appear at the top but I think thats
> just
> : blind luck more than anything else beca
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo