quot;Doberman Pincher" but not "Pincher,
Doberman". Here is how my schema is configured:
How can I update my autocomplete so that it will match the middle of a word
as well as the beginning of the word?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I found that if I change
to
I can do autocomplete in the middle of a term.
Thanks!
Brian Lamb
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've read numerous guides on how to set up autocomplete on solr and it
> works great the way I have it now.
be taking?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Sorry, the query is actually:
http://localhost:8983/solr/mycore/search/?q=test{!boost
b=product(sum(log(sum(myfield,1)),1),recip(ms(NOW,mydate_field),3.16e-11,1,8))}&start=&sort=score+desc,mydate_field+desc&wt=xslt&tr=mysite.xsl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
Any ideas on this one?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Sorry, the query is actually:
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/mycore/search/?q=test{!boost
> b=product(sum(log(sum(myfield,1)),1),recip(ms(NOW,mydate_field),3.16e-11,1,8))}&start=&sort=score+desc,mydat
?
Lastly, is it possible to use copyField to copy three regular fields into
one multiValued field and have all the data show up?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Hi all,
Any tips on this one?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a few questions about how the MySQL data import works. It seems it
> creates a separate connection for each entity I create. Is there any way to
> avoid this
ed to see if this feature had been added yet or if there
were plans to do so.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
sometimes more straightforward.
>
> Best
> Erick...
>
> P.S. Yes, it's pretty standard to have a single
> field be the destination for several copyField
> directives.
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Brian
) and thus it is timing out or something like that
but I cannot confirm that that is the case nor do I know how to fix it even
if it were.
Any help here would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
ion first.
But thanks for the suggestion!
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Sethi, Parampreet <
parampreet.se...@teamaol.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Not exactly solution to your problem. But it may help, you can run Solr
> directly on top of your database, if your schem
Hi all,
First of all, I'm quite new to solr.
I have the server set up and everything appears to work. I set it up so that
the indexed data comes through a mysql connection:
db-data-config.xml
And here is the contents of db-data-config.xml:
When I point
Hi all,
I was able to get my installation of Solr indexed using dataimport. However,
I cannot seem to get search working. I can verify that the data is there by
going to:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
This gives me the response:
But when I go
Hi all,
I was able to get my dataimport to work correctly but I'm a little unclear
as to how the entity within an entity works in regards to search results.
When I do a search for all results, it seems only the outermost responses
are returned. For example, I have the following in my db config fil
our mysql-query log? to see which queries were
> executed and what their result is?
>
> And, just as quick notice .. there is no need to use column="foo" name="foo"> (while both attribute have the same value).
>
> Regards
> Stefan
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011
rent field, well, you need to tell it :-)
>
> Is that it?
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:38 -0500, "Brian Lamb"
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was able to get my installation of Solr indexed using dataimport.
> > However,
> > I cannot seem
Thanks for the help Stefan. It seems removing column="specie" fixed it.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Stefan Matheis <
matheis.ste...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Brian Lamb
> wrote:
> > > indexed="true"
for your help so far. I think this is the last hurdle I
have to jump over.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Next question, do you have your "type" field set to index="true" in your
> schema?
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:06 -050
think this is the last hurdle
> I
> > have to jump over.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > > Next question, do you have your "type" field set to index="true" in
> your
> > > schema?
> > >
> &g
gt; Thanks to everyone for your help so far. I think this is the last
> > > > hurdle
> > >
> > > I
> > >
> > > > have to jump over.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > > > >
r.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Please also provide analysis part of fieldType text. You can also use Luke
> to
> inspect the index.
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/luke?fl=globalField&numTerms=100
>
> On Wednesday 02 March 2011 16:09:33
thing like:
Val
Val
Is this possible? If so, how?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Hi all,
I am using dataimport to create my index and I want to use docBoost to
assign some higher weights to certain docs. I understand the concept behind
docBoost but I haven't been able to find an example anywhere that shows how
to implement it. Assuming the following config file:
This has since been fixed. The problem was that there was not enough memory
on the machine. It works just fine now.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : INFO: Creating a connection for entity id with URL:
> :
> jdbc:mysql://localhost/researchsquare_beta_library?characterEn
Hi all,
I know that I can add &sort=score desc to the url to sort in descending
order. However, I would like to sort a MoreLikeThis response which returns
records like this:
I don't want them grouped by result; I would just like have them all thrown
together and then sorted according to
Anyone have any clue on this on?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using dataimport to create my index and I want to use docBoost to
> assign some higher weights to certain docs. I understand the concept behind
> docBoost but I haven't
7;,1.5);
>return row;
>}
>]]>
>
> query="select * from X">
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Jayendra
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Br
Hi all,
I'm using MoreLikeThis to find similar results but I'd like to exclude
records by the id number. For example, I use the following URL:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=id:(2 3
5)&mlt=true&mlt.fl=description,id&fl=*,score
How would I exclude record 4 form the MoreLikeThis results?
I
cosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Brian Lamb
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 4:05:10 PM
> > Subject: Excluding results from more like this
> >
> > Hi all,
d to put in for some_condition?
Thanks for all the help so far. I truly do appreciate it.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Bill Bell wrote:
> Yes just add if statement based on a field type and do a row.put() only if
> that other value is a certain value.
>
>
Any ideas on this one?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know that I can add &sort=score desc to the url to sort in descending
> order. However, I would like to sort a MoreLikeThis response which returns
> records like this:
>
>
>
&
HP to
simulate that but it seems horribly inefficient so I'd like to do it within
Solr if at all possible.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Any ideas on this one?
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Brian Lamb
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>
:
http://localhost/solr/search?q=dog&boost=true
The score of each document would be boosted by the number in the field
boost_score.
Unfortunately, I have no idea how to implement this actually but I'm hoping
that's where you all can come in.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
were when I left off the bf parameter. So what am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> See boosting documents by function query. This way you can use document's
> boost_score field to affect the final score.
>
>
so what am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
ving this error.
Did I not put the files in the right place? What am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
oaded. Additionally, when I go to http://localhost/solr/admin/, I get
the following message:
HTTP ERROR: 404
Problem accessing /solr/admin. Reason:
NOT_FOUND
What did I do incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> What do you mean "y
instead of this:
> > http://localhost/solr/admin/
>
> try this instead:
> http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/ <http://localhost/solr/admin/>
>
> Cheers,
> Geert-Jan
>
>
>
> 2011/3/18 Brian Lamb
>
> > That does seem like a better solution. I download
'org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler'
It looks like those files are there:
contrib/dataimporthandler/src/main/java/org/apache/solr/handler/dataimport/
But for some reason, they aren't able to be found. Where would I update this
setting and what would I update it to?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Mon, Mar
I'm still getting the same error.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the advice. I checked out a recent version from SVN and
> ran:
>
> ant clean example
>
> This worked just fine. However when I went to start the solr s
Awesome! That fixed that problem. I'm getting another class not found error
but I'll see if I can fix it on my own first.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
> --- On Tue, 3/22/11, Brian Lamb wrote:
>
> > From: Brian Lamb
> > Subject: R
reason why this happens
and how to fix it.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Awesome! That fixed that problem. I'm getting another class not found error
> but I'll see if I can fix it on my own first.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2
g.xml file:
db-data-config.xml
Thanks for all the help so far. You all have been great.
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
> > org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHa
I'm still confused as to why I'm getting this error. To me it reads that the
.java file was declared incorrectly but I shouldn't need to change those
files so where am I doing something incorrectly?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> That fixed that error as
Thank you for the suggestion. I followed your advice and was able to get a
version up and running. Thanks again for all the help!
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > I'm still confused as to why I'm
> > getting this error. To me it reads that the
> > .java file was declared
t:8983/solr/search/?q=animal:german shepherd&type:dog canine
I would want it to effectively be:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=animal:german AND shepherd&type:dog OR
canine
Other than parsing the URL before I send it out, is there a way to do this?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Thank you both for your input. I ended up using Ahmet's way because it seems
to fit better with the rest of the application.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:02 AM, lboutros wrote:
> The other way could be to extend the SolrQueryParser to read a per field
> default operator in the solr config file. The
only difference is that id is my primary key field so
that could be why it is showing up but why aren't the others showing up?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
The full import wasn't spitting out any errors on the web page but in
looking at the logs, there were errors. Correcting those errors solved that
issue.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> try the schema browser from the admin page to be sure th
d
Both records are returned. However, I only want RECORD1 returned. I
understand why RECORD2 is returned but how can I structure my query so that
only RECORD1 is returned?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
t;
> >>>
> >>> And I have some records:
> >>>
> >>> RECORD1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> man's best friend
> >>> pooch
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> RECORD2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> man's worst enemy
> >>> friend to no one
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Now if I do a search such as:
> >>> http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*&fq={!q.op=AND
> >>> df=common_names}man's friend
> >>>
> >>> Both records are returned. However, I only want RECORD1 returned. I
> >>> understand why RECORD2 is returned but how can I structure my query so
> >>> that only RECORD1 is returned?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Brian Lamb
>
>
d man to mankind in
the query, RECORD1 will be returned.
Even though the phrases companion and man exist in the same term in RECORD2,
I do not want RECORD2 to be returned because 'man' is not at the beginning
of the word.
How can I achieve this?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
>
> Ludovic
>
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/analysis/compound/DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter.html
>
> 2011/3/30 Brian Lamb [via Lucene] <
> ml-node+2754668-300063934-383...@n3.nabble.com>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I
it works with phrases though
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> On 31. mars 2011, at 16.49, Brian Lamb wrote:
>
> > No, I don't really want to break down the words into subwords. In the
> > example I prov
I just noticed Juan's response and I find that I am encountering that very
issue in a few cases. Boosting is a good way to put the more relevant
results to the top but it is possible to only have the correct results
returned?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Thank
earch based on more like this.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
arfs the highest response
score.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using MoreLikeThis for a while through select:
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=field:more like
> this&mlt=true&mlt.fl=field&rows=100&fl=*,score
I've looked at both wiki pages and none really clarify the difference
between these two. If I copy and paste an existing index value for field and
do an mlt search, it shows up under match but not results. What is the
difference between these two?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Brian Lamb
Does anyone have any thoughts on this one?
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Brian Lamb wrote:
> I've looked at both wiki pages and none really clarify the difference
> between these two. If I copy and paste an existing index value for field and
> do an mlt search, it shows up under
lp on this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Brian Lamb
24, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have an mlt search set up on my site with over 2 million records in the
> > index. Normally, my results look like:
> >
> >
&
983/solr/search?q=dog&bq=(*:* -species:Sheltie)^1
Return the exact same set of results with a record about a Sheltie as the
top result each time. What am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
when I launch my application,
there will be the potential for abuse. Is the best solution to have
everything reside on the same server?
What are some other solutions?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
our
>> backend services, whether it's a search server or a database server, to the
>> public.
>>
>> Read more about Solr security on the WIKI:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity
>>
>> --
>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>> Comin
d the like but is it
possible to combine the two?
Just to be clear, I don't want to send a PDF and have that be a part of the
index. But rather, I'd like to be able to use the PDF as a MoreLikeThis
search.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
If I change the field type in my schema, do I need to rebuild the entire
index? I'm at a point now where it takes over a day to do a full import due
to the sheer size of my application and I would prefer not having to reindex
just because I want to make a change somewhere.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Any thoughts on this one?
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've become more and more familiar with the MoreLikeThis handler over the
> last several months. I'm curious whether it is possible to do a MoreLikeThis
> search by uploadi
Would I be better off trying to use something like PHP to read the PDF file
and extrapolate the information and then pass it on to the MoreLikeThis
handler or is there a way it can be done by giving it the PDF directly?
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Any thoughts on t
ular
field?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
? I have
need to do more than one of them and from what I can find, it seems that
only computeNorm accounts for the name of the field.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although you can configure per field TF (by omitTermFreqAndPosit
f the similarity functions on a field by field basis? I have
> > need to do more than one of them and from what I can find, it seems that
> > only computeNorm accounts for the name of the field.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brian Lamb
> >
>
I believe I have applied the patch correctly. However, I cannot seem to
figure out where the similarity class I create should reside. Any tips on
that?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Thank you Robert for pointing this out. This is not being used
en in that case. At this point,
I'm not quite sure how to debug this to see whether the problem is
with the patch or the similarity class but given that the SweetSpot
similarity class didn't work either, I'm inclined to think it was a
problem with the patch.
Any thoughts on this one?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Also, I've tried adding:
To the end of the schema file so that it is applied globally but it does not
appear to change the score either. What am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Based on advice I received
I have for similarity is the line at the end of the file to
apply similarity to all searches but that does not even work. So where am I
going wrong?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Also, I've tried adding:
>
>
>
> To the end of the sc
Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Based on advice I received on a previous email thread, I applied patch
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
So what was my mistake? I still have not resolved this issue.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
>
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
>
>> (11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb wrote:
>>
&
.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/
So why isn't my installation taking the SweetSpot Similarity change?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
how can I go about fixing it?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> As far as i know, SweetSpotSimilarty needs be configured. I did use it once
> but
> wrapped a factory around it to configure the sweet spot. It worked just as
> expected and
; > import org.apache.lucene.search.DefaultSimilarity;
> >
> > public class MyClassSimilarity extends DefaultSimilarity {
> > public MyClassSimilarity() { super(); }
> > public float idf(int a1, int a2) { return 1; }
> > }
> >
> > So then this raises two qu
solr correctly?
Where is my mistake?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I looked at the patch page and saw the files that were changed. I went into
my install and looked at those same files and found that they had indeed
been changed. So it looks like I have the correct version of solr.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I se
gainst a field
containing "abcdefghijklmnop", then the idf will score that as a 7:
7.0 = idf(myfield: a=51 ab=23 abc=2 abcd=2 abcde=2 abcdef=2 abcdefg=2)
I get why that's happening, but is there a way to avoid that? Do I need to
do a new field type to achieve the desired affect?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
For this, I ended up just changing it to string and using "abcdefg*" to
match. That seems to work so far.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running into some confusion with the way edgengram works. I ha
I'm still not having any luck with this. Has anyone actually gotten this to
work so far? I feel like I've followed the directions to the letter but it
just doesn't work.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> I looked at the patch page and
I'm looking over the patch notes from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2338 and I do not understand the
difference between
param value
and
is there an echo?
When would I use one over the other?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
parameters, case isn't important either.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> That'll work for your case, although be aware that string types aren't
> analyzed at all,
> so case matters, as do spaces etc.
>
> What is the use-
f and in the case of an edgengram,
it returns 1 * length of the search string.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, bmdakshinamur...@gmail.com <
bmdakshinamur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you specify the analyzer you are using for your queries?
>
> May be you could u
Hi Tomás,
Thank you very much for your suggestion. I took another crack at it using
your recommendation and it worked ideally. The only thing I had to change
was
to
The first did not produce any results but the second worked beautifully.
Thanks!
Brian Lamb
2011/5/31 Tomás
I think in my case LowerCaseTokenizerFactory will be sufficient because
there will never be spaces in this particular field. But thank you for the
useful link!
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Be a little careful here. LowerCaseTokenizerFactory
Is it possible to do a search based on a PDF file? I know its possible to
update the index with a PDF but can you do just a regular search with it?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I mean instead of typing http://localhost:8983/?q=mysearch, I would send a
PDF file with the contents of "mysearch" and search based on that. I am
leaning toward handling this before it hits solr however.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
ch/?q=field1:word AND token field2:parser
syntax
But, I only want it to be applied to field1, not field2 and I want the
operator to always be AND unless the user explicitly types in OR.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I feel like this should be fairly easy to do but I just don't see anywhere
in the documentation on how to do this. Perhaps I am using the wrong search
parameters.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Brian Lamb
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible to change the query parser operator
not be possible.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Nope, not possible.
>
> I'm not even sure what it would mean semantically. If you had default
> operator "OR" ordinarily, but default operator "AND" just for &quo
18:53, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> > There's no feature in Solr to do what you ask, no. I don't think.
> >
> > On 6/7/2011 1:30 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> >>
> >> Thank you for your reply. Your point about my exampl
possible? If
so, where should I look for a guide?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
nce but it is quite annoying. Any ideas what's
going on?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
et an error message there too saying score is not a
recognized field.
Please help!
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Yes and that's causing some problems in my application. Is there a way to
truncate the 7th decimal place in regards to sorting by the score?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Brian Lamb
> wrote:
> > I've noticed some p
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
