When items are sorted, are all the docs with the sort field missing considered
"tied" in terms of their sort order, or are they "indeterminate", or do they
have some arbitrary order imposed on them (e.g. _docid_)?
For example, would "b" be considered as part of the sort in the following
query,
e...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: August-18-10 4:47 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort order of "missing" items
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Brad Dewar wrote:
> When items are sorted, are all the docs with the sort field missing
> considered &qu
Hi
In a multiValued field, I want to write a query that returns all the documents
that actually have more than 1 value in that field. (don't care what the value
is).
Maybe this should be obvious, but I just can't think of how to formulate such a
query.
Any help?
Thanks,
Brad
Hi
I'm trying to get my (overly complex and strange) product IDs sorting properly
in Solr.
Approaches I've tried so far, that I've given up on for various reasons:
--Normalizing/padding the IDs so they naturally sort
alphabetically/alphanumerically.
--Splitting the ID into multiple Solr fields
Haha, Yes, you're not wrong.
The field you are sorting on should be a fieldtype that has the lowercase
filter applied. You'll probably have to re-index your data, unless you happen
to already have such a field (via copyField, perhaps).
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Salman Akram [ma
I don't know: either way works for me via cURL.
I can only say double check your typing (make sure you're passing the
user/password you think you are), and double check server.xml.
Oh, the tomcat roles were tightened up a bit in tomcat 7. If you're using
tomcat 7 (especially if you've upgrad
