Hi,
I am using solr multicore join queries for some admin filters. The queries
are really slow taking up to 40-60 seconds ins some cases.
I recently read that the schema field used to join to should have
'docValues=true'.
Besides that, any suggestion to improve the performance?
-Bhawna
totally a
> requirement.
> But at least ask the question.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Bhawna Asnani
> wrote:
> > We are building an admin for our inventory. Using solr's faceting,
> > searching and stats functionality it provid
it says it successfully opened new
searcher and registered it as main searcher. Could this be due to caching? I
have tried to disable all in my solrconfig.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 20, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 7/20/2015 9:29 AM, Bhawna Asnani wrote:
>>
You can look inti Lire solr plugin. Works very well while searching similar
images.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 18, 2015, at 9:14 AM, chalitha udara Perera
> wrote:
>
> thank you Ahmet !
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Ahmet Arslan
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chalitha,
>>
>> You may find these
Hi,
I have a use case where we have to write data into solr and immediately
read it back.
The read is not get by Id but a search call.
I am doing a softCommit after every such write which needs to be visible
immediately.
However sometimes the changes are not visible immediately.
We have a solr cl
x27;ll have to build in a
> retry
> loop, some other kind of delay or change the requirement.
>
> And under heavy indexing load this will not be performant.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Bhawna Asnani
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have
om: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:04 PM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: SOLR nrt read writes
> >
> > On 7/14/2015 12:19 PM, Bhawna Asnani wrote:
> > > I have a use case where we have to write
Hi,
I am experiencing a similar issue. We have tried method uif but that didn't
help much. There is still some performance degradation.
Perhaps some underlying changes in the lucene version its using.
Will switching to JSON facet API help in this case? We have 5 nodes/single
shard in our productio
