(System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + ",
query=" +
QueryParsing.toString(rb.getQuery(), rb.req.getSchema()) + ",
indexIds=" + getIndexIds(rb));
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-
From: Andrew Lundgren
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.ap
We have a few internal fields that we would like to restrict from being
returned in result sets.
I have seen how fl is used in specify fields that you do what returned, I am
kind of looking for the opposite. There are just a few fields that don't make
sense to return to our clients.
Is there
Hmm... Just found this JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
I think I have answered my question.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lundgren [mailto:lundg...@familysearch.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Making fields
the amount
of memory that will be set aside for the cache?
How do you determine how much cache each fq will consume?
Thank you!
--
Andrew Lundgren
lundg...@familysearch.org
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and
the aforementioned bitmap. The
number of entries specified in the config file is the number of entries
in that map. So the cache can take up roughly (assuming the size if 512)
512 * maxDocs / 8 bytes.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Andrew Lundgren
wrote:
> I am new to solr in gene
> For Filter cache
>
> size in memory = size in solrconfig.xml * WHAT (the size of an id) ???
> (I
> don't use facet.enum method)
>
As I understand it, size is the number queries that will be cached. My short
experience means that the memory consumed will be data dependent. If you have
a huge
s, then AND the resulting doc sets and then
once that is done score the query based on the resulting subset of documents?
--
Andrew Lundgren
lundg...@familysearch.org
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged i
Is it possible to configure solr such that the filter query cache settings is
set to fq={!cache=false} by default?
--
Andrew Lundgren
lundg...@familysearch.org
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information
where this should be handled?
We have several clients and would like to protect the server from this field
being queried on even if they make a mistake.
Thank you.
--
Andrew Lundgren
lundg...@familysearch.org
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may
t; We've done similar query rewriting in a custom SearchComponent that
> runs before QueryComponent.
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
> >___
We use the toString call on the query in our logs. For some numeric types, the
encoded form of the number is being printed instead of the readable form.
This makes tail and some other tools very unhappy...
Here is a partial example of a query.toString() that would have had binary in
it. As a
at 3:24 PM, Andrew Lundgren
wrote:
> We use the toString call on the query in our logs. For some numeric
> types, the encoded form of the number is being printed instead of the
> readable form.
>
> This makes tail and some other tools very unhappy...
>
> Here is a partial e
I think you're saying), which has
nothing at all to do with Terms, it's just the query string passed in. So I'm
really puzzled as to what you're doing to get this kind of output, it almost
looks like you're trying to print out the _results_ of a query, not the query.
So so
to get this kind of output, it almost
looks like you're trying to print out the _results_ of a query, not the query.
So some clarification would be helpful...
Best
Erick
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Andrew Lundgren wrote:
> I am sorry, I don't follow what you mean by debug=query
14 matches
Mail list logo
