b + b
* fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
0.3334 = phraseFreq=0.3334
1.2 = parameter k1
0.75 = parameter b
5.2576485 = avgFieldLength
2.56 = fieldLength
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
Yes Erik I can use ps=0 but, my problem is that I want phrase which have
same sequence and they can be present with in some distance
E.g.
If I have document masitha xyz 12345
I want that to be boosted since the sequence is in order .That's why I have
use ps=5
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
On 1
herParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser
> >
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > q=({!edismax … ps=0 v=$qq}) OR {!complexphrase df=nameSearch v=$qq}
> >
> > where &qq=12345 masitha
> >
> > Erik
> >
> >
> >> On Jun 12, 2017
n - 2017-05-30 07:32:54]
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.stream.CloudSolrStream.open(CloudSolrStream.java:299)
~[solr-solrj-6.6.0.jar:6.6.0 5c7a7b65d2aa7ce5ec96458315c661a18b320241
- ishan - 2017-05-30 07:32:54]
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
SimpleFacets.java:803)
... 39 more
However if I try to query without grouping it is working fine.
Any Idea how to fix this.
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
red by multiple requests and should be closed
when the application exits.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> Hi,
> I think their is a possible bug in Solrj version 6.6.0 ,as streaming is
not
> workin
ot; directory) (stand alone) or
create a new collection (SolrCloud)?
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> Hi,
> Facets are not working when i'm querying with group command
> request-
> facet.field=isBlibliShipping&facet=true&group.facet
t. Either
> a> create an entirely new collection starting with the modified schema
> or
> b> shut down all your Solr instances. Go into each replica/core and
> 'rm -rf data'. Restart Solr.
>
> That way you're absolutely sure everything's gone.
>
> B
earch categoryKeywords^11 keywords^11 nameSearchNoSyn^9
descSearchNoSyn^2
5
nameSearch^9 brandSearch^8 descriptionSearch^2 categoryKeywords^10 keywords^10
nameSearch^9 descriptionSearch^2
0
searchFields
100%
*:*
10
*,score
1
after
true
false
5
2
5
true
true
5
10
*false*
spellcheck
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
n where the issue is encountered.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Aman Deep Singh
> wrote:
> > But I only changed the docvalues not the multivalued ,
> > Anyway I will try to reproduce this by deleting the entire data directory
> >
> >
ry is like ABC or ABC XYZ then you
have to use phrase queries or fields with keyword tokenizer etc. and in
which case above queries will not work.
Thnx
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a problem ,I need to give the boost to a particular field if a
Yes alessandro,
I know that their us some downsight of using sow =false but if don't use
it then neither shingle nor bhram will work ,and these are required in my
case/setup
On 19-Jun-2017 8:18 PM, "alessandro.benedetti" wrote:
Isn't this a case where you don't want the query parser to split by
11:01:49 AM EDT, Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
>Yes alessandro,
>I know that their us some downsight of using sow =false but if don't
>use
>it then neither shingle nor bhram will work ,and these are required in
>my
>case/setup
>
>On 19-Jun-2017 8:18 PM, "alessandro.benedet
r field. But _changing_ either one is
> chancy.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Aman Deep Singh
> wrote:
> > I tried to recreate the collection and its working fine,
> > But if i try to change the any field level value this error again com
from this.
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
This error is coming in the application which is using solrj to communicate
to the solr
full stacktrace is
Request processing failed; nested exception is com.gdn.solr620.org.apache.
solr.common.SolrException: Could not load collection from ZK:
productCollection
org.springframework.web.util.NestedS
It was not matching the results for that particular field
below is the debug data
(+DisjunctionMaxQuerynameSearchNoSyn:7 nameSearchNoSyn:armour)~2)^9.0 |
((brandSearch:7 brandSearch:armour)~2) | ((nameSearch:7
nameSearch:armour)~2)^4.0 | (keywords:7 armour)^11.0 | ((descSearchNoSyn:7
descSearc
8:09 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/20/2017 8:25 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
> > This error is coming in the application which is using solrj to
> communicate
> > to the solr
> > full stacktrace is
> >
> > Request processing failed; nested
va:405)
at
org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.lambda$getFacetFieldCounts$0(SimpleFacets.java:803)
It Only appear in case when we facet on group query normal facet works fine
Also appears only when we atomically update the document.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:46 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/20/2017 12:07
Heisey wrote:
> On 6/20/2017 11:01 PM, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
> > If I am using docValues=false getting this exception
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Type mismatch: isBlibliShipping was
> > indexed with multiple values per document, use
them. You should set stored="false" for all destinations of copyField
> directives.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Aman Deep Singh
> wrote:
> > No Shawn,
> > I download the latest solr again then run without installing by comman
Use mm=100% in the request handler
It will give the same AND functionality
On 06-Aug-2017 11:59 AM, "mohanmca01" wrote:
hello Allison.
thank you for the information.
i referred to your slide "33", yes we are looking for same kind of results
and solution.
would you please guide us on how to a
lace the token with *applewatch and iwatch* (in lowercase),which i
didn't want
I need the synonyms to comes with the same case what i have configured
i.e. *appleWatch and iWatch*
Any idea on how to so that .
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
atch
PRF
applewatch
iwatch
WDF
applewatch
iwatch
LCF
applewatch
iwatch
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
On 09-Aug-2017 8:46 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
> Admin/analysis is a good place to start figuring this out. For
> instance, do you have lowerCaseFilter configured in your analysis
> chai
Yes,
Ignore case is set to true and it is working fine
On 10-Aug-2017 12:43 AM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
You set ignoreCase="true" though, right?
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
> I tried even before going to lowercase factory valu
You can configure mm either in the request handler sorconfig.xml or pass as
a request parameter along side the user query
For more detail refer
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+DisMax+Query+Parser
example of sample handler is
10
searchFields
100%
dismax
Try the edge ngram filter
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
I think it will help you solve the problem
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 7:08 PM mohanmca01 wrote:
> Hi Aman Deep Singh,
>
> Thanks for your update... I will update the sta
Hi all,
Any update on this issue.
-Aman
On 10-Aug-2017 8:27 AM, "Aman Deep Singh" wrote:
> Yes,
> Ignore case is set to true and it is working fine
>
>
> On 10-Aug-2017 12:43 AM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
>
> You set ignoreCase="true" though, r
doc1 has frequency of 1 (lock term frequency).
Any Idea what to do ,to avoid getting doc 1 in resultset as i don't want
user to get the Doc1.
Schema
<
tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
Their is no synonym is added also.
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
(qf or
pf )dynamically ,will definitely try to use the function query.
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
On 22-Sep-2017 6:25 PM, "Emir Arnautović"
wrote:
> Hi Aman,
> You have wrong expectations: Edismax does respect mm, it’s just that it is
> met. If you take a look at parsed q
hat
would mess score…
Maybe there is something specific about your usecase that could be used to
make it work.
Emir
> On 22 Sep 2017, at 15:17, Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
>
> Hi Emir,
> Thanks for the reply,
> I understand how the dismax/edismax works ,my problem is I don't want t
and any way to fix so that mm will
work across fields in qf.
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
Thanks steve,
I got it but my problem is u can't make the every field with same analysis,
Is there any chance that sow and mm will work properly ,I don't see this in
future pipe line also,as their is no jira related to this.
Thanks ,
Aman deep singh
On 28-Nov-2017 8:02 PM, "Ste
)
4. Ngrams field (model related field, partial word matches)
> On 29-Nov-2017, at 8:30 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>
> Hi Aman, see my responses inline below.
>
>> On Nov 28, 2017, at 9:11 PM, Aman Deep Singh
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks steve,
>> I got it but
Hi,
Recently I migrated from solr 4 to 6
IN solr 4 shinglefilterfactory is working correctly
my configration i
But after updating to solr 6 shingles is not working ,schema
Alex.
>
> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
>
>
> On 16 March 2017 at 08:30, Aman Deep Singh
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently I migrated from solr 4 to 6
> > IN solr 4 shinglefilterfactory
ore after changing definitions?
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 16 March 2017 at 12:37, Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> Already check that i am sending sceenshots of various senarios
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:46 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
For images dropbox url is
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6dy6a8ajabjtxrt/AAAoxhZQe2vp3sTl3Av71_eHa?dl=0
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:29 PM Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> Yes I have reloaded the core after config changes
>
>
> On 16-Mar-2017 10:28 PM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch"
>
e" outputUnigramsIfNoShingles="false"
> So, every single token during the query gets ignored because there is
> nothing for it to shingle with.
>
> I am not sure why it would have worked in Solr 4.
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> http://www.solr-start.com/ -
ources for Solr users, new and experienced
>
>
> On 16 March 2017 at 22:22, Aman Deep Singh
> wrote:
> > If I give query in quotes it converted query in to graph query as
> >
> > Graph(cust_sh6:"one plus one" hasBoolean=false hasPhrase=false)
> >
> >
I also tried in 5.2.1
for the query
http://localhost:8984/solr/test/select?q=TITLE_SH:one\%20plus\%20one&wt=xml&debugQuery=true
0
1
TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one
xml
true
TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one
TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one
*((TITLE_SH:one plus TITLE_SH:one plus one)/no_coord) TITLE_SH:plus one*
(T
, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> I also tried in 5.2.1
> for the query
>
> http://localhost:8984/solr/test/select?q=TITLE_SH:one\%20plus\%20one&wt=xml&debugQuery=true
> <http://localhost:8984/solr/test/select?q=TITLE_SH:one%5C%20plus%5C%20one&wt=xml&am
You can play with the merge factor in the index config.
If their is no frequent updates then make it 2 ,it will give you High
throughput and less latency.
On 24-Mar-2017 8:22 AM, "Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo" wrote:
> I also did find that beyond 10 threads for 8GB heap size , there isn't much
> improvem
using the q.op and played around the mm also but nothing is
giving me the correct response.
Any idea how i can fetch that document even if the document is missing any
token.
My expected response will be getting the document
"one plus one" even the user query has any additional term like "one plus
one two" and so on.
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
thus due to Boolean + it was not matching.
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:41 PM Rick Leir wrote:
> Hi Aman
> Did you try the Admin Analysis tool? It will show you which filters are
> effective at index and query time. It will help you understand why you are
> not ge
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >>
> >> --
> >> Steve
> >> www.lucidworks.com
> >>
> >>> On Apr 4, 2017, at 5:32 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Aman,
> >>>
omi nameSearch:xiomi)) (nameSearch:mi)
(nameSearch:5) -(Synonym(nameSearch:putih
nameSearch:white))*(nameSearch:[64gb/ TO 3gb])*)~4)
Now due to automatic conversion of query to Range query i'm not able
to find the result
Solr Version-6.4.2
Parser- edismax
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
rd (TO).
If my query is like [64GB/3GB] it works fine and doesn't convert to range
query.
Thanks,
Aman deep singh
On 06-May-2017 12:04 AM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
I'm going to go a little sideways and claim this is an "XY" problem,
the range bits are a side-issue.
I'm using a custom request handler with deftype as edismax
My query is -
xiomi Mi 5 -white [64GB/ 3GB]
On 06-May-2017 12:48 AM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
OK, what _request handler_ are you using? what is the original query?
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Aman Deep Singh
wr
awn Heisey" wrote:
On 5/5/2017 12:42 PM, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
> Hi Erick, I don't want to do the range query , That is why I'm using
> the pattern replace filter to remove all the non alphanumeric to space
> so that this type of situation don't arrive,Since end user
:
>
>> On 5/6/2017 7:09 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
>> After escaping the square bracket the query is working fine, Is their
>> any way in the parser to avoid the automatic conversion if not proper
>> query will be passed like in my case even though I haven't passed
&
ld you not have an
enumerated type for the products, and simplify everything? I must be
missing something here. Cheers -- Rick
On May 6, 2017 8:38:14 AM EDT, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>On 5/5/2017 12:42 PM, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
>> Hi Erick, I don't want to do the range query , That
Yes hoss,
it only convert to the range query when there is two token only,,BTW
thanks for raising the issue
On 11-May-2017 5:38 AM, "Chris Hostetter" wrote:
> : I'm facing a issue when i'm querying the Solr
> : my query is "xiomi Mi 5 -white [64GB/ 3GB]"
> ...
> : +(((Synonym(nameSearch
found a SOLR thread for same question
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conditional-atomic-update-td4277224.html
but it doesn't contains any solution
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
17 2:05 AM, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
> Is their any way to do the SOLR atomic update based on some condition
> Suppose in my SOLR schema i have some fields
>
>1. field1
>2. field2
>3. field1_timestamp
>4. field2_timestamp
>
> Now i have to update value of fi
Hi Lavanya,
This is probably due to the kstem Filter factory it is removing the y charactor
,since the stemmer has rule of words ending with y .
Regards,
Aman Deep Singh
> On 21-Jan-2019, at 5:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> querystring is what goes into QPaser, parsed
.
Regards,
Aman Deep Singh
sults with same value
Solr version = 6.6.0
Scale function = scale(query({!type=edismax v=$q}),0,100)
Regards
Aman deep singh
6-1,TOA-15630-1-1,TOA-15631-2-1,TOA-15632-5-1,TOA-15632-00039-1,TOA-15633-1-1&wt=json&expand=true>
Note:- if i remove some of the ids it starts working ,and issue is not coming
for all the queries.
Regards,
Aman Deep Singh
59 matches
Mail list logo
