marked as "won;t fix" but some other important
subissues are marked as resolved. What's the overall status of the
effort?
Thank you in advance,
Aleksey
eries taking more time at first than you might like
>> in exchange for the hardware savings. This pre-supposes that
>> you simply cannot fit all the cores into memory at once.
>>
>> The "won't fix" bits are there because, as we got farther into this
>>
> A use case would a web site or service that had millions of users, each of
> whom would have an active Solr core when they are active, but inactive
> otherwise. Of course those cores would not all reside on one node and
> ZooKeeper is out of the question for managing anything that is in the
> mil
> Aleksey: What would you say is the average core size for your use case -
> thousands or millions of rows? And how sharded would each of your
> collections be, if at all?
Average core/collection size wouldn't even be thousands, hundreds more
like. And the largest would be half a
pload a new schema to solr.
> On Jun 8, 2013 1:15 AM, "Aleksey" wrote:
>
>> > Aleksey: What would you say is the average core size for your use case -
>> > thousands or millions of rows? And how sharded would each of your
>> > collections be, if at all?
>
Bump.
this thread is with someone having a similar issue:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201601.mbox/%3c09fdab82-7600-49e0-b639-9cb9db937...@yahoo.com%3E
It seems like this is not really fixed in 5.4/6.0?
Aleksey
From: Steve Weiss
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7
evant to the user. This query returned
30% of the full result, but I have other queries in the log where
partial result is just empty. Am I doing something wrong?
P.S. I am using Solr 3.6.1, index size is 3Gb and easily fits in memory.
Load Average on the Solr box is very low.
-- Aleksey
Thank you!
That seems to be the case, I tried to execute queries without sorting
and only one document in the response and I got execution time in the
same range as before.
-- Aleksey
On 12-11-21 04:07 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
It could be that the time to get set up to return even the
is doing something wrong. But clearly, I set a
timeout too low for that and started to harm even normal queries.
Anyway, thanks everyone for the replies. The issue is fixed and I now
understand how timeout works much better (which was the reason to post
to this list). Thanks!
-- Aleksey
On
Solr server to Mysql server via command line
mysql client.
Does anybody knows anything about this exception and how to fix it?
I am not able to reproduce it on any other environment.
-- Aleksey
in Search phase (which is the only one respecting timeAllowed, as
far as I know), but in the sorting phase. And still, I want to abort any
longer running query. Otherwise they accumulate over time, pushing
server's load average sky high and killing performance even for regular
queries.
-- Aleksey
On 12-08-29 11:44 AM, dhaivat dave wrote:
Hello everyone .
Can any one know any component or tool that can be used for testing the
solr performance.
People were recommending https://code.google.com/p/solrmeter/ earlier.
-- Aleksey
the previous binaries.
-- Aleksey
On 12-08-29 06:17 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Not much information to go on here, have you tried the DIH
debugging console? See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#interactive
Best
Erick
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Aleksey Vorona wrote:
We
olr or put query complexity estimation code in our
application. But in any case your response was greatly appreciated,
because I was thinking that I am missing something.
-- Aleksey
On 12-08-30 05:51 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
The first thing I'd do is run your query with &debguQuery
production with Jetty 7, but I thought it
would be better to ask about Solr example, since it is easier for anyone
to reproduce the issue.
-- Aleksey
plication/xml; charset=UTF-8
* no chunk, no close, no size. Assume close to signal end
<
...removed the rest of the response body...
-- Aleksey
On 12-09-05 03:54 PM, Aleksey Vorona wrote:
Hi,
Running example Solr from the 3.6.1 distribution I can not make it to
keep persistent HTTP connectio
Thank you. I did the test with curl the same way you did it and it works.
I still can not get ab ("apache benchmark") to reuse connections to
solr. I'll investigate this further.
$ ab -c 1 -n 100 -k 'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*' | grep Alive
Keep-Alive r
Hi,
I have a field with space in its name (that is a dynamic field). How can
I execute search on it?
I tried "q=aattr_box%20%type_sc:super" and it did not work
The field name is "aattr_box type"
-- Aleksey
hat works! Thank you!
Sidenote: of course I urlencode space.
-- Aleksey
Thank you for that insight. I, myself, would've liked to remove the
spaces, but it is not possible in that particular project.
I see that I need to learn more about Lucene. Hopefully that will help
me avoid some of those headaches to come.
-- Aleksey
On 12-09-19 11:42 AM, Erick Eri
Hi,
I remember having some issues with replication and autocommit
previously. But now we are using Solr 3.6.1. Are there any known issues
or any other reasons to avoid autocommit while using replication? I
guess not, just want confirmation from someone confident and competent.
-- Aleksey
Thank both of you for the responses!
-- Aleksey
On 12-09-27 03:51 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
I'll echo Otis, nothing comes to mind...
Unless you were indexing stuff to the _slaves_, which you should
never do, now or in the past
Erick
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Aleksey V
ithout all-wildcard constraint,
200ms with it).
Could someone explain the source of the difference, please?
I am fixing the application not to generate such queries, obviously, but
still would like to understand the logic here. We use Solr 3.6.1. Thanks.
-- Aleksey
t solr doesn't find any
docs for this request (These docs exist, I checked). I guess I need
to tweak some preferences but I can not find the corresponding options.
Thanks for your attention.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
I searched and read about auto-complete feature. Thanks. It looks
nice, I think I should try it first.
NM> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:15:21 +0300
NM> Aleksey Gogolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm new to solr and I need to make a s
solr server. But
when I'm trying to search for "samsu" (the part of word "samsung") I
still get no result. Seems like solr treats "ac" field like the
regular field.
What did I do wrong?
Thanks in advance.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
ot;acer spire one". The problem is that there are
no docs for query "acer spire one".
There are some docs for q=acer+one and there are docs for q=spire. But
there are no docs for q=acer+spire+one.
Is there a way to get only selling suggestions that produces at least
one doc?
Thank you for your attention.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
thout displaying the results.
r> If the numdocs is greater than or equal to one only I have displayed the
r> spellcheck result. Otherwise don't display the spell check value.
Thanks. I also thought about this solution, but I hope that somebody
know more elegant way :)
--
Aleksey Gogole
he query into what I call a backoff query, i.e. it converts AND to OR
The first solution sounds more suitable, but alternative approach is
also interestiong. Thanks for relpy.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
't change and
remains the same: "samsung monitor ad345 lcd".
I have no idea what did I do wrong :(
Thank you in advance.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
containing "appl", "aspir" or "batteri". I checked.
How to force spellchecker to return words with right endings?
Thank you for attention.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
Hello.
Is there a way to change the port (8983) of solr example?
I want to run two solr examples simultaneously.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
s configured
RM> in example/etc/jetty.xml
RM> the relevant line is:
RM> >
RM> ryan
RM> On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Aleksey Gogolev wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Is there a way to change the port (8983) of solr example?
>> I want to run tw
would be nice to use solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory for
this purpose. So the question is: Can I use solr filters for
processing "description" string before copying it to "suggestion"
field?
Thank you for your attention.
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
ype.
FT> -Todd Feak
FT> -Original Message-
FT> From: Aleksey Gogolev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FT> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:28 AM
FT> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
FT> Subject: Question about copyField
FT> Hello.
FT> I have field "description"
cal.
The result of filter chain wasn't actually stored in the "ex" filed :(
Anyway, thank you :)
FT> -Todd
FT> -Original Message-
FT> From: Aleksey Gogolev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FT> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:24 AM
FT> To: Feak, Todd
FT> Sub
le I gave was for the searching side of things. Not the data
JN> representation in the document.
JN> -Todd
JN> -Original Message-
JN> From: Aleksey Gogolev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JN> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:14 AM
JN> To: Feak, Todd
JN> Subject: Re[4]
retrive
token with AnalysisRequestHandler.
JN> Could you post fieldType specification for "ex"? What your regex look
JN> like?
JN> -Original Message-
JN> From: Aleksey Gogolev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JN> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:39 Joe
JN>
7;t contain SynonymFilter:
--
--
Any ideas about reasons of this strange behaviour?
--
Aleksey Gogolev
developer,
dev.co.ua
Aleksey
"numFound":1,
"startOffset":6,
"endOffset":15,
"suggestion":["cybershot"]},
"collation","canon cybershot"]}}
---
As you can see, word powershot is highlighted in first
40 matches
Mail list logo