Re: Solr8.7 Munin ?

2020-11-23 Thread Bernd Fehling
We are using Munin for years now for Solr monitoring. Currently Munin 2.0.40 and SolrCloud 6.6. Regards Bernd Am 20.11.20 um 21:02 schrieb Matheo Software: Hello, I would like to use Munin to check my Solr 8.7 but it don’t work. I try to configure munin plugins without success. Is

RE: Solr8.7 Munin ?

2020-11-23 Thread Bruno Mannina
Hello Bernd, Do you use a specific plugins for Sorl ? Thanks, Bruno -Message d'origine- De : Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de] Envoyé : lundi 23 novembre 2020 09:02 À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: Solr8.7 Munin ? We are using Munin for years now for Solr

Re: Solr8.7 Munin ?

2020-11-23 Thread Bernd Fehling
Hi Bruno, yes, I use munin-solr plugin. https://github.com/averni/munin-solr I renamed it to solr_*.py on my servers. Regards Bernd Am 23.11.20 um 09:54 schrieb Bruno Mannina: Hello Bernd, Do you use a specific plugins for Sorl ? Thanks, Bruno -Message d'origine- De : Bernd Fehlin

RE: Solr8.7 Munin ?

2020-11-23 Thread Bruno Mannina
Ok thanks for this help ! -Message d'origine- De : Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de] Envoyé : lundi 23 novembre 2020 10:46 À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: Solr8.7 Munin ? Hi Bruno, yes, I use munin-solr plugin. https://github.com/averni/munin-solr I renam

Re: Use stream result like a query (alternative to innerJoin)

2020-11-23 Thread Joel Bernstein
There are two streams that behave like that. One is the "nodes" expression, which is not going to work for this use case because it does everything in memory. The second one is the "fetch" expression which behaves like a nested loop join with some limitations. Unfortunately the main limitation is

Re: Use stream result like a query (alternative to innerJoin)

2020-11-23 Thread Joel Bernstein
Here is the documentation for fetch: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/stream-decorator-reference.html#fetch Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 3:22 PM Joel Bernstein wrote: > There are two streams that behave like that. > > One is the "nodes" express

Query generation is different for search terms with and without "-"

2020-11-23 Thread Samuel Gutierrez
I am troubleshooting an issue with ranking for search terms that contain a "-" vs the same query that does not contain the dash e.g. "high-tech" vs "high tech". The field that I am querying is using the standard tokenizer, so I would expect that the underlying lucene query should be the same for bo